meester, I'm only going to address you this once because I don't like wasting my time: you're so slanted I'm surprised you can stand upright. I tell you this because I give you more credit than, say, Will or Sam, who I simply ignore as a sociopath and troll respectively.
I don't know if you're blinded by hate, but in the context we're using 'blind' you most certainly are blind. You don't think so or see it, of course, as the blind never do. From someone who's colorblind, take this advice: if everybody is telling you the object is red, it's red. Even if you only see green.
This is where that blindness comes in; every post I've seen from you in this Politics forum has shown clearly you only want answers
that agree with you. You seek only slanted facts that fit your biases and little else and when the facts aren't there you look for made-up ones.
This little piece of defensiveness shows it's probably true.
Listen, we all have our opinions, biases, filters, etc. But build them based on the facts, yeah? Don't build the facts based on your biases.
I never denied hating him.
I hate Obama and his wife.
i hate Biden.
I hate both Clintons .
I hate pelosi.
I hate Reid.
And a lot of other politicians who I consider traitors at best.
Traitors meaning they sell out the people they are elected to represent for their own personal gain.
They do things that they know are detrimental for the country to maintain their own wealth, power and control.
I never denied it.
So I hate them, does that change anything?
I could say that a lot of you are blinded by unfounded love , false hope, failure to admit you were wrong, race, party loyalty or few more reasons.......doesn't change a thing.
what I want to know is:
Why was there such inferior security at these embassies?
Why weren't they evacuated that day?
Why were requests for more security denied, even after some had been recently attacked?
What kind of security intel did they really have on and before that day?
Why was no help deployed there immediately?
Why did they lie, and its pretty obvious that they did, and say it was about a video?
Now we are getting news that they were watching it in real time, if this is true what possible defense can anyone possibly have?
Pretty big considering one PREZ got impeached for lying about a robbery that he had nothing to do with.
I know why the news media is not all over it, its to protect his election. but even Stewart and letterman are starting to ask questions.
I know that a big part of this whole mess was because the democrats had 2 positive things to say about themselves during the convention.
A- We killed Bin laden. B- Al-quada is on the run and our foreign policy is working so damn good.
well there is your motive. make it out like it was just some spontaneous protest over a video just like the cartoon a few years back this way it won't look like nothing has changed in the middle east.
downplay it, lie about it because it will hurt our campaign if the American people know what really happened.
But the problem with lies is that when you get caught in one you need to either tell the truth or make up another lie to cover the first one.
So even though I hate these people this is not me hating. This is me wanting to know what happened. Transparency from the noble peace prize winner president and his subjects.
P.S Are the parents in those videos I just posted "haters " too? Watch those videos and if doesn't make you want to know the truth at least for them then you have no heart.
