Circumcision

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Stop comparing circumcision to a massacre. It is done for health reasons. Many male pornstars are circumcised and they have no probs.
 
Look folks, you're born with a foreskin. It's there for a reason. Health reasons my arse!! Unless it's something like it's too tight, which is legitimate reason for having it removed, leave it the fuck alone. If you wash it properly every day like everything else there's no problems with cleanliness. Maybe in really hot climates or something there could be issues I dunno.

And maybe we should spare a thought for those who had it done at birth and didn't get a choice.

i agree 100%
cant believe the stupidities i read on this thread,
only you americans are still doing this torture to
babies for one reason only:esthetics and its certainly not a good reason
since a hard dick,circumsized or not,looks the same.

30% of men worldwide has had the operation,mostly for religious purposes.

the HIV studies(saying that you have more chance of gettind aids if you are uncircumcised )was done in africa,and wiki states clearly that the study,does not really aplly to america.and even if it apply to america,would be stupid enough to not wear a condom because you are circumcised
and one thing is sure,and no study denies it,theres a loss of sensibility,so please stop the non-sense

its there for something!!
 
Stop comparing circumcision to a massacre. It is done for health reasons. Many male pornstars are circumcised and they have no probs.

Compare a few cum shots in porn scenes between cut and uncut and you'll soon seen uncut guys ejaculate with more force and more squirts. A lot of cut porn stars only dribble when they cum.
 
I couldn't imagine getting circumcised, it seems totally pointless. I don't see that it looks all that different anyhow, hardly a drastic difference in appearance.
 
Compare a few cum shots in porn scenes between cut and uncut and you'll soon seen uncut guys ejaculate with more force and more squirts. A lot of cut porn stars only dribble when they cum.

yea....like when i watch some videos with about 2 or 3 chicks for a guy...its incredibly hot, but at the end....he only drips cum.....he doesnt shoot it
 
In August 2000 I had this done to me. I had nodules growing on my foreskin so the Doctor advised me to have it removed - so I did.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Compare a few cum shots in porn scenes between cut and uncut and you'll soon seen uncut guys ejaculate with more force and more squirts. A lot of cut porn stars only dribble when they cum.

Lexington Steele and Peter North are both circumcized yet they cum a lot far more than Carlos Lagonzilla or big Ben English who are both uncut pornstars.
I forget to mention about Keith Riviera, Dale Da Bone and Billy Glide who have + 8 inch circumcized dicks and who cum very hard.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
I couldn't imagine getting circumcised, it seems totally pointless. I don't see that it looks all that different anyhow, hardly a drastic difference in appearance.

it also prevents stds and it is more hygienic. A friend of mine said that uncircumsized cocks look like ant eaters.:1orglaugh :laugh:
 
it also prevents stds and it is more hygienic. A friend of mine said that uncircumsized cocks look like ant eaters.:1orglaugh :laugh:

I've also heard people compare them to Snofallofagus from Sesame Street.

When I was born, the doctor, who happened to be my grand-uncle, told my mom that there was only a minor possibility that my foreskin would give me problems in later years, and, as such was the case, he didn't recommend circumcision. I have never experienced any problems with it. In fact, my girlfriend loves playing "peek-a-boo" with it. ;)
 
Had mine as a very young infant, I'm glad it was done then and not much later in life as I can imagine that being very painful and difficult to adjust to. I still find it to be quite sensitive, sometimes too much so ;) I do choose my boxers carefully though :)

Had it done for health reasons, seems the hood was too snug a fit lol and I'm guessing it's genetic as both my old man and my brother are the same.
 
Lexington Steele and Peter North are both circumcized yet they cum a lot far more than Carlos Lagonzilla or big Ben English who are both uncut pornstars.
I forget to mention about Keith Riviera, Dale Da Bone and Billy Glide who have + 8 inch circumcized dicks and who cum very hard.

Peter North is famous for how much he cums because he's such an exception for a cut guy which is the norm in America. There's always going to be exceptions. But just take the average cut and compare to him to the average uncut and the uncut always cums harder. Look at a few bangbros movies. The cut guys there can squeeze out one shot with force if they're lucky and the rest is dribble. The uncut guys fire off 4 or more shots with force which often shock the girls.

it also prevents stds and it is more hygienic.

Both your statements are unproven. There was one study in Africa where 1000 cut and 1000 uncut men were monitored over a few years and more of the uncut men contracted HIV. I'm not sure of the numbers but they weren't definitive and obviously a condom is far better protection.
 
I can think of a few dickheads that could use a cut.

but I mean above the waist.
 
I don't mind either way. I've had both and enjoyed both.

They do say that circumcised penises give the illusion of looking bigger than the equivalent uncut penis, but I stress this is simply an illusion - and so perhaps another reason why many male pornstars tend to be circumcised.
 
Top