Thirty bucks a month to see her not get naked? Is this a joke?
I can't understand people spending money to see pictures they can see if they open any magazine or browse any website with pictures of women. Charging that much for a non-nude website is robbery.
She is beautiful and I am sure its nice having a hot girlfriend but why people pay money to see girls keep their clothes on is a complete mystery to me.
Because there's web cams, fun videos, interaction with the talent and a bit of community on the cam chats. Its fun. Its like, say a porn forum, which is 50% unhappy people
I couldn't hold out any longer. I joined. I'm knee deep is awesome content right about now.
She's like a younger version of Catalina Cruz.
How the hell does she has FF tits? She's only 5'0". They don't look any bigger than DD's.
It's less unhappy and more bored with the same old crap. It was tired 5 years ago when Nikki did it and its no less tired now, despite how apparently hot this girl is. If anything I am unhappy that there are people out there willing to pay thirty dollars a month for the type of content they could see for free practically everywhere else on the internet and that this business model exists and is successful.
Paying to see someone not take their clothes off is silly. Paying to see someone take their clothes off is only slightly less so, but its the principle of the thing.
I guess because there's such a shortage of nude girls on the net you guys are going to try and peer pressure her into showing her tits and vag.
If she shows the naughty bits or not I'll still look. Sometimes it's fun to be teased. :yesyes:
If someone doesn't like non nude or tease models, why waste your time looking at them? Last time I checked, there are hundreds if not thousands of nude girls online to entertain you, aren't there?
hey eltardo, where else are you promoting bryci's site? just curious where online you've been spreading the word. thanks