The only reason they would need martial law, is to keep the hillary supporters safe.....the trump voters are the ones with the guns.
I voted for Hillary and I'm quite well armed.
The only reason they would need martial law, is to keep the hillary supporters safe.....the trump voters are the ones with the guns.
I voted for Hillary and I'm quite well armed.
I voted for Hillary and I'm quite well armed.
Same here. Big conservative misconception that they're the only ones that hoard firearms for fun.
Wait! You said you voted for Trump.
Make up your mind.
Wrong !Obama wasn't able to seat Merrick Garland, who is anti-2A.
Agreed. It's quite common from politiciand to avoid taking contoversial measures even thought they would love ot, just because they think it would cause hem to loose the next elections. Their appetite for power is stronger than their will to do what they think is rightHis biggest regret is probably not pushing through immigration reform and more stringent background checks for guns during his first 2 years, BUT THEN HE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN REELECTED!
Wrong !
He just happen to have a different interpretation of the 2nd Amendment
Agreed. It's quite common from politiciand to avoid taking contoversial measures even thought they would love ot, just because they think it would cause hem to loose the next elections. Their appetite for power is stronger than their will to do what they think is right
You suck, your threads suck, your fucked up country sucks, eat a bowl of dicks.
Thanks :yesyes:
Actually, I consider being insulted far-right wingers like you, by people who said they are fine with everything Trump could deo or not do in the next 4 years, just becuse his name is not Hillary as a badge of honor. The day ou'll start agreing with me, to tell how clever and well informed I am, then I'll start being worried about the lame excuse for a human being I've become. But the more you will call me names, the more I will feel that I am good person.
So thanks for taking the time to insult me, I really appreciate it.
I fully believe in the freedom of the press, but we may seriously have to look at some special classification for people who create fake sensational news stories and do no actual journalism, but peddle lies, misquotes, and misrepresentations to hype up people with similar political beliefs or make money from ad revenue. While it may seem funny for now, it has real potential for some dangerous consequences. People can die, even revolutions could happen based on fake stories being shared and repeated in an extreme right or left echo chamber.
There need to be consequences for this.
lets have a beer summit at the presidential garden of the freeones thread writersThank God that after Trump's first 100 days Stompy Foot's only legacy will be Cash For Clunkers and maybe the Beer Summit.
Then you would have to put Alex Jones behind bars for at least 1,000 yearsI fully believe in the freedom of the press, but we may seriously have to look at some special classification for people who create fake sensational news stories and do no actual journalism, but peddle lies, misquotes, and misrepresentations to hype up people with similar political beliefs or make money from ad revenue. While it may seem funny for now, it has real potential for some dangerous consequences. People can die, even revolutions could happen based on fake stories being shared and repeated in an extreme right or left echo chamber.
There need to be consequences for this.