if you don't like the site then don't click on it and then don't visit it.
All of the things found there are subgenres of gay porn. Unless the guy is a hardcore racist/black supremacist, I don't see any straight black man viewing that.
I'm just sick of IR porn making all black men look like gangsta-thugs and white women treated as trash. Promoting stereotypes. So, I don't watch it.
As if only white men like to watch their wives while they are being fucked a black guy. Why?
hmmm...I don't know, but I really love this type of action :banana::banana:
Interestingly in a weird way the exploitative stuff only exists as an affront to racism if you know what I mean. In other words, it seems because there are some who are so offended by the mere notion of white chicks fucking black dudes that this sort of over the top genre is created to poke and exploit that. I think it's garbage.
It's too bad that too many think this is representative of I/R porn. Most of the porn that I've seen that involved some of the top performers who happen to be black were just like any of the other gonzo or feature scenes. Just one performer was one race and the other another race. I'd never even seen some of the exploitative stuff that most attribute to being representative of I/R. But some of the top black porn dudes (Seam Michaels and Lexington Steele) don't do that kind of porn that I know of. Certainly Lexington Steele doesn't win AVN Male performer 3 times doing that kind of junk.
I think that's just a cover for their activities. Some of that stuff is filmed by a black producer. It has come out that he also makes porn where white male drug addicts are humiliated and then fucked by black men. I would see it as racist. In the end, this all reflects poorly on white people or at least the segment of white society so depraved that they would take part in it. But much worse is the portion of white society that actually buys that stuff.
You see it as "racist" and it's not difficult to make that mistake. However, there is ALL kinds of humiliation "porn" of which this junk is but one type. I don't get it, I suspect you don't but there are some people who are into humiliation junk...this just happens to be I/R humiliation.
Obviously humiliation can only exist if there is some perceived situation which humiliates. Which brings me back to my earlier point of how the mere notion of I/R being offensive to some actually creating the circumstance for this genre of humiliation "porn" to exist.
Beyond all of that, you do understand that there are some people who are only interested in seeing some dude fucking some chick (or whatever) and the theme is irrelevant to them, right?
There are some people who aren't so socially fragile that they pay attention to the porn theme involving two people who are irrelevant to their lives more than they pay attention to the fucking in the scene.:2 cents:
Besides, there are most likely blacks who watch black chicks get fucked by whites...Asians and Latinos too....What do you make of that? Are they depraved also?
If I were to go out to a store and call the black manager, a grown man, "boy" many people would call it racist. I'd be trying humiliate him by saying he's not an adult man like myself. Whites in the past used that remark to adult black men to say, "you're not on my level." It's humiliation.
When someone makes a porn film based on degrading one particular ethnicity, most people would guess it's racist or prejudice.
Archie Bunker and George Jefferson were two racist characters on fairly popular television shows for years. That doesn't mean Carroll O'Conner and Sherman Hemsley were racists though..:2 cents:
By some people logic they would be. best clip ever is when Sammy Davis Jr. kisses Archie, pure classic.
You see its good to be the brown man. Well I am technically Asian but I am like in between black and certainly not white. Although I mainly date white chicks I also like Jamaican chicks. Something about the girls from the islands man they tend to have some perfectly tight bodies.
Anyways my parents are "mixed" so it never really bothered me. Course there is plenty of trash on the internet of all kinds of messed up crap. Just dont look at it. I mean dam there are women with animals which if you dont find that disturbing then dam!
In that context it is "racist". But in the context of a movie it's not...it's a performance.
Archie Bunker and George Jefferson were two racist characters on fairly popular television shows for years. That doesn't mean Carroll O'Conner and Sherman Hemsley were racists though..:2 cents:
I'm Jamaican and yes we do have some of the most beautiful women in the world.:bowdown:
As for the site,I watch it and also the one called 'White Cumbang' Or something like that. It's the same thing in reverse,white dudes all banging a black chick. And a matter of fact,most sites that cater to IR porn have a white producer. They know it's the best selling genre right now,duh.
I never said it was the same thing. I was giving you an example of the differences in context of who or what might and/or should be considered "racist".That was to make fun of racist people. How is that the same thing as the type of porn you're referring to.
The person/group being mocked is not the racist. It's a black supremacist fantasy being played out with junkies.
It's not the best selling genre. Generic Big Tit, Big Ass porn has been the best selling genre for years.