No, worse name for a movie ever was Attack of the Clones.
Batman 3 Gets New Title
- Thread starter Basedow
- Start date
No, worse name for a movie ever was Attack of the Clones.
The title is weak,but as long as it's good no one will really care,besides Nolan could change it. As for the villain. I would go with Hush and Black Mask.
If that's true, it would explain the swamp locale.
Not.
My dark knight just rose... 
This is screaming for a porn paradoy...
PlasmaTwa2
The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
I've been pushing for Harley Quinn since the last one came out. If you were planning on having the Joker in this one, why not have him as an off-screen presence and have Harley do his bidding? She doesn't have to be the main villian, but it'd be nice to have her in the film after they excluded her in TDK. For a main villain, why not Deadshot? A perfect villain for Nolan's realistic style. And what exactly is so outlandish about the Penguin? Please, can someone tell me? Why can't Nolan make the Penguin a major crime boss who is only called the Penguin behind his back? What about his umbrellas? He doesn't need them, and if you need to put them in simply have one of his umbrellas function as a gun for protection. It isn't that hard. He doesn't have to be a deformed freak unless you decide you want him to be.
And all that aside, I can't wait for the last Batman movie:
And all that aside, I can't wait for the last Batman movie:
As much of a Harley Quinn fan that I am, I have to say I'm really indifferent on Harley appearing in this "Dark Knight Boner" sequel. Mainly due to the fact that whatever plans for Heath's Joker returning have been nixed. Which I think would make Harley's inclusion feel a bit forced. We really don't know where the Nolan's were wanting to go with Ledger's Joker, but if let's say Heath Ledger had never passed away and was infact returning in some capacity for this sequel, then a reference, cameo, or significant role in the movie (something!) with Harley would have definately been expected and appreciated.
Exactly. :glugglug:
Chris Nolan has gone on record of saying the Penguin would be "tricky" which makes no sense. It's quite evident that Nolan 'get's Batman. He's made two Batman films that people absolutely love, but then he says something like that and acts like he's never read a Batman comic in his life. There's absolutely nothing tricky about it. Penguin can be a british arms dealer, or even the new head of Gotham's underworld. I mean really, there's several ways he can be translated from the comic book pages, to Nolan's "heightened reality" Batman world, but apparently, and much like the Riddler, it's not in the cards. And as far as umbrella's go, I wonder if the Nolan's have read this story.
http://www.readrussia.com/blog/made-in-russia/00120/
I don't know if I would make either of them the only villains or main villains but I'd love to see Catwoman in a movie that didn't involve her being resurrected by cats. She's a thief, damn it! Not a zombie cat-human hybrid.
Don't forget Inception. Possibly his best.
Happy Halloween!
Resurrected by cats? FUCK NO!
