I don't think it has anything to do with actual age, as much to do with subconscious triggers. From a psychosexual point of view, the schoolgirl outfit reminds the sexual subconscious memory of a time when a lot of us were at our horniest and for plenty of us our most sexually frustrated, when we were entering into adulthood and started to badly want to have sex with girls we were at school with and our hormones were out of control. It's not to do with us actually wanting to fuck schoolgirls, any more than foot fetish is to do with actually wanting to fuck your mother because she's coming over to feed you. It's just triggers.
Plus, a short skirt and pigtails is never NOT going to look horny on an attractive woman, is it?
What an excellent post! I would rep you, but it wouldn't do any good. Still, it's the thought that counts.
People have a hard time realizing that not everyone falls into the same category or is coming from the same place. Are there guys who actually are attracted to very young girls (or boys)? Sure. And yeah, that's messed up. But are there also guys who aren't so much attracted to them (now), but can remember back to the time when seeing Sandy P in her cheerleading outfit, trying not to make any noise while you were fingering her on the sports bus coming back from a basketball game? There's that too. Same reason why a lot of guys drool over classic or muscle cars that were popular when they were in high school. Thinking back about Sandy makes me smile because after her came her younger [NOBABE]sister Dee[/NOBABE], who was even more fun! Same memories I have of the first time I drove a big-block Chevelle. But you couldn't give me a 1970's Chevelle (to drive) these days and I wouldn't want a 16 year old girl to play with... or her 14 year old (even hornier) sister. But I was 15 and yeah, those are ALL pleasant memories from my youth. Sandy looks damn rough these days. But at least a cherry, big-block Chevelle would be worth around $40 grand - so maybe I'll take back what I said about having one of those!
On a further note, I find it interesting (in an odd way) that the topic of age winds people up so much. Yet, certain sites and performers freely participate in fetishes that play directly into the incest game: especially mother/son, but also father/daughter, brother/sister, etc. Is that not illegal AT ANY AGE???!!! As I've said, I'm pretty libertarian when it comes to what people do or like. I generally don't care all that much. But that doesn't mean that I don't think that a mother/son or father/daughter fetish isn't about the sickest thing imaginable. But Stacy from Wife Crazy and a whole host of other porn performers on Clips4Sale and other places are making a mint doing it. What's the attraction? I don't know. I do give Bree Olson credit for admitting here that there were fantasies floating around in the dark recesses of her mind that would get her arrested if she acted them out though. It wasn't just her "normal"
fuck me, daddy/spank me, daddy stuff, I'm guessing - she did that all the time. Given what's "acceptable" (or politically correct) in porn these days, she must have been thinking of some pretty foul shit if even she was worried about winding up in cuffs. So why is that not at least as
cringe-worthy as some 20-something dressing up in a schoolgirl outfit? :dunno:
People are crazy and times are strange... or so says Bob Dylan (and I guess he would know
).