I've always wondered that myself. I can sort of buy into the "heat of the moment" argument where one might not be paying full attention to which sidearm they are grabbing, but if you are an experienced, trained officer of the law, you should definitely know the difference. Gun on one side of your hip, taser on the other. No mistakes.
3 words : 73 years old
Some more thoughts about this: We really got heated about this - and I say, rightly so. But going into old routines about specific members "hot topcs" isn't really helping. That s just talking smack to get around arguing, possibly for lack of valid points, don't know.
The quotes above hint at a central issue, the man is not a fully trained, long-serving police officer, he paid for being one, and I assume that caused a shortage of training and experience. And he is in an age range where you just are not as fast and able to get things right in a rush. I believe he could have been an excellent officer indoors, using his life's experience handling people in situations where there is no firefight and fistfight involved.
I am waiting for news that shine a light on his personal background, now he turned himself in. Was he really thinking he could do something like a volunteer sheriff in the wild wild west, now he had free time, as he maybe stopped working fulltime as an insurance dealer? Right now that is my working theory, until things indicate otherwise.