Well we still got Miller and Coors, but who knows how long those will stay American.
Hopefully within the next 50yrs what we now know as the United States of America won't have become part of the European Union.
Why do so many Americans moan when an American company is bought by foreigners but they utter nary a peep when American companies buy foreign ones?
Why do so many Americans moan when an American company is bought by foreigners but they utter nary a peep when American companies buy foreign ones?
Why do so many Americans moan when an American company is bought by foreigners but they utter nary a peep when American companies buy foreign ones?
Healthy companies BUY whereas weak companies get bought. When a company gets bought, it's basically a public admission of failure and weakness (even if it's great for the stakeholders of that company.) Buying companies are free to close operations, sell off assets and displace workers....those things usually ruin American towns..:dunno: Americans usually feel more sympathy for fellow Americans as opposed to when those things happen to "foreigners"...
What you should be asking is: Can we stomach "Globalization" if it could mean the end of the things that make America unique? A-B made shitty beer but the beer wasn't always "cheap and shitty" back in the early days. 120 years of American tradition has vanished, basically...
Let me make one thing clear. The Busch family did not cash out or want this deal to go through. They tried everything they could to stop it. August the 4th is heartbroken and old Gussie is spinning in his grave. They couldn't stop it though. At $65 a share, they can argue that their own cost cutting measures would get the share to a price >$65. Their estimates would put the share price between $71-$72. When Inbev offered $70 a share, they could not turn it down. They have no plan in place to get the share price higher, their plan involves execution risk, and their theoretical stock price is in the future while Inbev's offer is now. If they had turned it down like they would have liked to, they would have been crucified by the money managers and financial markets and then been ousted from the board, putting Inbev in the same position.
As far as not liking their beer, well 1 out of every 2 beers drank in this country is a AB product so someone must like it. Not to mention they brew over 100 different labels, many of which you guys probably think are microbrews or foreign brews.
I do own shares and will still be voting against it when I get the proxy. Some things just aren't for sale. For me, AB stands for everything that is right with this country, so needless to say I don't want to see some wafflemakers come buy it. Its not going to be pretty.
I doubt you see any change to the product.Did you notice any change at your local A & P Food stores when the germans aquired it a couple decades ago. They are probably not dumb enough to try "New bud" like coke tried with "New Coke".:1orglaugh
Yes, they were Germans, along with Pabst, Schlitz and several others. These German immigrants basically changed the drinking habits of Americans away from Rum/Whiskey. These beer barons did a lot of community good for Milwaukee and St Louis.
Having said that, today, Anheuser-Busch bears little similarity to the founding fathers. It is nothing more than cheap, corn-filled, swill. InterBev simply decided that the American Economy is in a once-in-a-lifetime SHITHOLE and they get to remove a competitor AND takeover distribution..all on the cheap. I imagine there is laughter all across Belgium today.
For me, I don't really care. There are far superior American beers and Stella and Beck's are far superior macrobrews. So I look at it as a positive for quality beer.
However, there will be big changes in Advertising and Marketing. I doubt InterBev will care to sponsor so much American sporting events or continue the theme parks...
well, maybe they'll make good beer now?