It's hard to feel sorry for people who insist on living in an area that is known to burn to the ground every year.
I wasn't dwelling on the private property losses, that's probably the last thing that I'm concerned with. How about :
√ The human risk involved in fighting these blazes in the air and on the ground ?
√ The expenses involved in combating such blazes at a time when the state is facing bankruptcy
√ The abundance of wildlife that will undoubtedly perish
√ The air pollution exhausted from the fire as well as from the equipment involved in fighting the fire
√ The alkaline enrichment pollution from fire ash combined w/ rain run off > into the streams causes all kinds of havoc to the ecosystem
√ The potential for landslides and flooding to occur during the winter rains in the affected area(s) due to the absence of green vegetation
√ The strain on fire dept resources in California, Nevada, "Arid zona" and any other region or state that has been called upon to act as a strike team to fight such immense fires causes the urban & rural fire depts to run thin on resources to fight fires or may cause extended emergency medical response times in areas where you might live :dunno:
√ Finally, and I'm certain that I missed a few :o
The expenses related to the reforestation of the area affected, that is, if the assholes @ the sierra klub don't file a lawsuit to prevent reforestation.
:wave2: