How long do whoremaker's childish, ignorant, aggressive, profane outbursts usually last? To be a flamer is to be a public failure. Can he spew more eloquent entertaining bile that is vaguely on topic? Are there periods of lucidity and reason or is this it? The mods might consider his fitness. A superficial brief cruise through his contributions doesn't help his case. Thoughts anyone?
American Reputation
- Thread starter SiCo
- Start date
Philbert
Banned
That you're really a silly person, and whoremaker has you pretty well correctly described?
You can leave, nothing keeping you here except your free will...:wave2:
Very interesting post.
There you go again, sputtering your wannabe-elitist gibberish. How sad. It's like watching a monkey try to use a computer. Oh wait, like... It is watching a monkey use a computer.
Honestly, your posts are like some strange bastardization of Mad Libs. No substance, no meaning, no value; just random multisyllabic adverbs strung together loosely in the hopes that the message's droning denigration of a topic which you have a tenuous grasp of, will wear out the reader and trick them into thinking, "Huh, that little guy really knows his stuff!" Instead, much like HELLDOUCHER, you simply display, again and again, that you're nothing more than a clueless, propaganda munching simpleton, regurgitating that anti-America rhetoric fed to you by your pseudointellectual idols. Forget awareness. Forget knowledge. Forget understanding. Buzz words, soundbytes and mob mentality suffice for people like yourself.
Such a sad, meaningless existence...
Thanks Phil. :hatsoff:
SgtMarine
Banned
How long will you keep replying to him? If you don't like his post or what he has to say then do fucking reply to them.
I can never understand why folks are told to stop replying because they argue with someone here. Arguing is not bickering or quarreling, it is healthy and progressive and moves ideas around. Those who start making the suggestion of "stop replying" are probably more keen to back track out of an argument they're caught up in. If you find you're in that position, you probably didn't have much conviction in what you said in the first place and are finding it hard to accept what you're hearing from others.
Please don't try and kill the thread.
Please don't try and kill the thread.
Sure is a lot of hate going on in here. I got one thing to say... IF YOU TRULY HATE AMERICA, YOU ALWAYS HAVE THE OPTION TO LEAVE!
I think the election of Obama (and Democrat And aan Afro-american) get the american people less hated outside america.
But the failure of the Copenhague meeting and the fact that, s now, Obama has done nothing significant about international issues get people in doubt.
Many of the people i Europe that were over-enthusiastic after Obama's election are realising that he's not a messiah, he's just the US President and his main priority is to make america and the american have a better life, even it's means to cause european people some troubles...
But the failure of the Copenhague meeting and the fact that, s now, Obama has done nothing significant about international issues get people in doubt.
Many of the people i Europe that were over-enthusiastic after Obama's election are realising that he's not a messiah, he's just the US President and his main priority is to make america and the american have a better life, even it's means to cause european people some troubles...
SgtMarine
Banned
It looks like whore and noe are going into a flame war, which is what my post was talking about.
Listen if you don't like someone posts then don't read them. Instead of criticizing blindly what one posts, perhaps you should try to contribute by proving that the person is wrong with a better and much more convincing argument.
And you what do you bring to the debate seriously? I would like to know.
Aside criticizing others what kind of contribution do you bring? Dare to tell me?
I think Noeline's made some good points if you read a few posts back.
The fact that Obama is a mainly community organizer make him hated inside his country (blacks voted for him because he is black), he is far to be a great leader. The People who usually hate America in Europe are the people from the left and the poor people that are mainly migrants coming from the Maghreb or the sub saharian Africa as well as retarded teenagers and non american cultured europeans who love leftists. Most of people in Europe are governed by leftist socialist governments that have a very short memory of who saved their countries asses from the Nazis. Oh but I forgot, most of teenagers buy levi's jean, buy nike shoes, drink coca cola and watch American movies afterall so a big couple of shut the fuck up is necessary for the ungrateful anti american pigs who think that America is arrogant. Also giving a Nobel prize to Obama was the dumbest and the lamest thing to do. Bailouts and free healthcare are both big failures, the change with Obama you have it up the ass.
GregCentauro
Banned
Too general, mon capitaine! Left Europeans like the liberal side of the USA. Beat poetry, The Summer of Love, Berkeley in the Sixties, the Civil Rights Movement, the anti-war movement were great inspirations for the student uprising and eventual political and social reforms that significantly reshaped Western Europe after 1968.
What left/liberal Europeans don't like is the American mainstream represented by the political right. Not only do we mistrust American claims for superiority. It is foremost the religiosity pervading large parts of America's self-conception that estranges a continent based on secularism (especially your country, Georges
)The combination of trigger happy military force and religious rhetoric of the Bush years has damaged America's image abroad. Whether US citizens care or not. For those who might have forgotten: During the Clinton years, the US were very popular amongst Europeans.
Europeans don't like Obama because they think he's a brilliant politician (most people are too uninformed to jump to any conclusions about his performance). They like him because he appears to be more modest and more sophisticated than the Bush crowd.
Too general, mon capitaine! Left Europeans like the liberal side of the USA. Beat poetry, The Summer of Love, Berkeley in the Sixties, the Civil Rights Movement, the anti-war movement were great inspirations for the student uprising and eventual political and social reforms that significantly reshaped Western Europe after 1968.
What left/liberal Europeans don't like is the American mainstream represented by the political right. Not only do we mistrust American claims for superiority. It is foremost the religiosity pervading large parts of America's self-conception that estranges a continent based on secularism (especially your country, Georges
The combination of trigger happy military force and religious rhetoric of the Bush years has damaged America's image abroad. Whether US citizens care or not. For those who might have forgotten: During the Clinton years, the US were very popular amongst Europeans.
Europeans don't like Obama because they think he's a brilliant politician (most people are too uninformed to jump to any conclusions about his performance). They like him because he appears to be more modest and more sophisticated than the Bush crowd.
I would have to agree that Clinton did seem quite popular amongst Europeans despite his philandering.
I can only speak for England but most of the time feelings about the USA don't break down across party lines. I can think of a number of British right wingers who would be happy to employ a similar approach to economic matters as the republican party, but in no way does stop them from disliking the USA.
On the point about african americans and their voting behaviour, are you under the impression that this segment of society is incapable of thinking about what a candidate can do if elected and can only make decisions based on visual stimuli? Again, relying on personal experiece of black people in america I have found them extremely capable of making choices that are not based on racial affiliation. Indeed I have had some very pleasurable encounters precisely because of this. Yum.
Nobody is saying that. Blacks are just as capable as whites, or Asians, or anyone else, of making those kinds of decisions and thoughts. However, it is true that during the last election, blacks (as a voting demographic) largely voted for Obama, and indications are that the overriding reason was racial solidarity. That is simply how it happened. What is says is debatable, but I don't believe that anyone argues that is implies that blacks cannot think of grander concepts. Myself, I think it simply says that, as a group, they voted alike. Nothing more, nothing less.
Similar threads
