Then Bonds should go into the Baseball Hall of Fame.A-Rod reportedly tested positive for steroids
That's what I thought.
A-Rod tests positive for seriods, yet you're bashing Griffey for his performance?
A little ironic, dont you think? :dunno:
:shrug: It's their body. If they want to change it to become better.. how is this different from playboy bunnies getting boob jobs or .. eh, who cares.
If the possibility to be great is there, they can only be better with some help. Whatever.
Re:
Then Bonds should go into the Baseball Hall of Fame.
What controversial issue
On one hand, so what if they choose to use roids to increase their game.
Be all you can be.
On the other hand it seems like cheating, especially regarding the record books.
Ted williams and Lou gehrig for example never did roids.
If they had one can only imagine the numbers they would have acheived.
I know a little about roids, I thought most players did deca durobolin but now I find they are using Primobolan + (legal) testosterone(to decrease the limp dick side effect).
Primobolan just so you know is not a real strong steriod, but I suspect some were just using this in between off season cycles of stronger stuff.
But maybe not.
I'm just saying that Primobolan is not gonna get you huge or turn you into Lou Ferrigno.
It will just give you an edge and make your workouts somewhat more intense and the recovery between workouts faster therefore increasing your strength.
Most of the guys don't have a clue what they're actually using. They take whatever their "trainer" tells them, and now the trainers are cashing in --cough McNamee cough. Besides, wouldn't you think they'd take shorter estered drugs so they could avoid the drug tests altogether? I would go with daily shots of suspension (ouch) or proprionate. Deca and Winny stay in the system too damned long. Maybe some CYpionate or Enanthates over the winter. Primobolan would be a waste of perfectly good androgen receptors, the shit is just too weak.
Well, glad to see the tired "they don't know what they're taking" argument won't have any legs now that he's admitted to using. The only question now is whether his "I only used in the past" argument will fly. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3894847&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines
"NEW YORK – Sports Illustrated has reported that Alex Rodriguez tested positive for steroids in 2003."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090207/ap_on_sp_ba_ne/bba_rodriguez_steroids
But if they are all on roids or were, than what's the problem?
Well, glad to see the tired "they don't know what they're taking" argument won't have any legs now that he's admitted to using. The only question now is whether his "I only used in the past" argument will fly. http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3894847&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines