Search results

Really? I'd say supporting ******* for fun, and only for fun, is a far more pitiful view. When my judgemental attitude does not involve ********* death and your judgemental attitude does, I think I'll pick mine. 1. So? I happen to value *******. You seem to believe you had a god given right...

Er, what? It's closing threads that result in new ones being posted. By my standards, mods should leave the threads alone and not punish everyone just because a few people can't behave. If things go so far, ban them, I don't care. But if I do nothing wrong, I don't think it's too much to ask...

Bart's Dog Gets an F (or something like that) I thought it was okay the first time I saw it, but it was not until after I got a dog that I could truly appreciate it. I watched it on DVD and laughed myself silly.

Re: Hey there, I just signed up here! Sheesh, and here I thought having Jehovas Witnesses call me every couple of months and read obscure references in the bible despite my aggressive lack of interest was bad.

Re: Hey there, I just signed up here! No, I suppose I wouldn't either. Thankfully, that particular scenario has never been an issue for me.

Re: Hey there, I just signed up here! There's a thread with a list of all (or most at least) the other star members.

Re: Hey there, I just signed up here! I imagine the easiest way would be to go here and send a private message. Welcome, by the way.

So don't post in it. No reason to prevent the people who don't think it's a waste of time from discussing it. Apparently there is an interest judging from the recent threads, so the issue is still very much open. Therefore, so should the thread be.

There is a slight difference between ******* and hunting. It's possible to ***** without hurting someone else. It's not really possible to **** someone without hurting them.

And to me, humans are as well (or, if you'd prefer, ******* are not). Does that mean you wouldn't mind if I come knocking on your door, chase you around your house for a while, and then shoot you for no particular reason? Hell, it's even necessary if you look at how fast the human population is...

I have the same two categories now that I started with: Those that hunt for fun ("sport") and those who hunt for a reason (meat, control etc.). Ditto. I'm an American? Cool, you learn something new every day I guess.

How convenient. All I'm asking you to do is prove that a word does not mean what I think it does. Of course I can't listen to logic, you haven't actually presented any for me to listen to yet. Again, what does bloodthirsty mean if it doesn't mean looking forward to ******* or wounding another...

There has been a bunch of theories about Judas where he is not such a bad guy. I don't remember exactly how it all went because it was quite a while since I read it, but I remember one argument that made a lot of sense was that the Romans simply didn't need Judas. It was common knowledge what...

Like I said, I don't think there is a much better definition of the word than enjoying ******* things. 3 out of 3 dictionaries I looked it up in described it as "eager for bloodshed". A person who enjoys ******* something, whatever that may be under whatever scenario, is as far as I'm concerned...

Be that as it may, I'm yet to hear someone refer to the activities at a slaughterhouse as a sport, and I'm quite sure that anyone who openly takes pleasure in putting a bolt through the skull of a cow would be considered somewhat unstable. Against better judgement, I'll say something. I can't...

Zero. I'm not thrilled about it, but I'm not ashamed either. I haven't tried (and the one explicit offer I had was from a complete stranger who I think had more than a few exotic substances in her circulation). I can live with it.

Then I'd like to hear from the people who did vote "In Favor". I'm sure their side of the fence is mighty interesting.

It still doesn't explain why 12 people (so far) feel it's perfectly okay to **** an ****** for fun. Slaughtering ******* serve a purpose; people have to eat. This poll was not about whether you think hunting is okay, it's about whether you think hunting for sport is.

Indeed. Throw in a couple of cannibals and you don't have to worry about cleaning up the mess either.

I'd say nature is quite capable of regulating itself. In most cases where nature needs "help", the problem was caused by human interference in the first place. Rabbits in Australia were, in fact, introduced by hunters so that they would have something to hunt. Also, unless you're talking about...

Har har.

I have no problem with hunting as such. As a form of acquiring meat to sell or eat, it's certainly not worse than a cow being slaughtered (I'd even argue it's a far better option from the ******'s point of view). But as entertainment? I would suggest the hunters who hunt for that reason go out...

Then I'd like to direct you to the 2nd sentence in my post. Or, as an alternative, you could just say that the word "defenseless" is obsolete because no one is, by your definition, defenseless.

Of course there is. You take a religious fanatic and remove any and all potential weapons. I hope you do realize that there are Muslim fundamentalists (as well as Christians, Buddhist etc.) that actually doesn't go around armed to the teeth, ********* infidels all day long.

Er, so this qualifies as an April Fools? I don't get it.

The less I know about the sex life of my parents, the better. There is not a chance in hell I'll ask them for specific dates.

Bit early for an April Fools joke considering about 2/3rd of the world is still in the 31st of March. In any case, short of the moderating staff going certifiably insane, it's perhaps the only reasonable explanation.

Right. So (again) I ask you, when did I ever advocate suicide?

It pisses you off that others are of a different opinion?

Great if you ever fall overboard, though...

Again, I'd like to point out that you've completely failed to understand my argument. Either because I've failed to express it, or because (and I'm leaning towards this explanation at the moment) you don't want to understand. Show me a single quote where I say suicide is honorable, or good, or...

Then you've completely failed to understand my argument.

Really? And have you ever wondered why you didn't swallow those pills, pulled that trigger, made that fatal turn and actually end it? I know why I didn't, and it was not bravery. I'm not glorifying suicide. I'm correcting a misunderstanding; that fear is the cause. The sole purpose of fear is...

And what if, for the sake of argument, I have?

Fear is what keeps us alive, bravery is what gets us ******. I can only conclude that anyone who claims that knowingly ending your own life does not take guts has never held that bottle of pills in their hand or stood at the edge by the tracks and watching the train approach. Let me tell you...

I beg to differ. It's mostly thanks to cowardice that I'm alive today.

Basically, top to bottom: Overall height, hair, face, eyes, chest, stomach, hips, legs. That's generally it, but not necessarily ordered after my preference.

I voted yes, but I don't support it per say. If people want to do it and no one involved has a problem with it, why not? None of my business.

I would read it, but I fear my brain cells will spontaneously start dying if I do.

The first one could possibly be "Murdercycle", an incredibly bad, low-budget horror movie about some guy on a bike that ***** people for whatever reason (it turns out he's an ***** or something). I don't remember much of it (thank God) and it's probably not the one you're looking for, but it's...

Ye gods. Do I have to carry around a big sign saying "It's a joke"?

Alright, you lost me.

Get the VLC player. It can play most files I've encountered without needing to download any codecs.

I do sometimes, but often find the stories rather disappointing. I wouldn't turn down a well-written story though.

Nothing wrong with her old ones. I don't see why you should spend a lot of money and risk health problems in the future to fix something that doesn't need fixing. But hey, if she wanted to do it and likes the result, good for her. None of my business really.

Re: how much masturbation is too much When it starts to hurt, you might want to consider stopping. Well, unless pain is a part of the process, I'm not judging anyone.

Except that it's not, but whatever.

She's attractive and all, but it got sort of boring after a while.

Assuming you're actually serious, a nomination out of spite, which I suspect that would be, is worth little. You can make little tiaras for everyone and have them call each other "Your royal highness" for all I care. As long as you don't try to make me acknowledge you just because you got a...

You don't have to repeat what I said, thank you very much. I know what I said. In my very first post I said that I don't participate, I'll continue to not participate, and I don't give a damn one way or another. Trying to turn me into a bad guy by somehow implying that I go around "bad mouthing"...