Search results

I'm not so sure I like the forum being used to advertise stuff to me.

If she's not a porn star, what are they saying she is?

Life imprisonment is the solution.

0nl5O-mJAjE

…er…

Ha! That's brilliant. Great find!

The news.

The press like characters though and that's exactly what Palin is. From the look, to the voice to the things she says, she's gold journalists.

Ron Jeremy.

Awful.

Re: Jennifer Hawkins poses nude and unairbrushed Hmm, I know what you're saying, not everyone is going to be Aphrodite but I think maybe in this case that is just a bad photo, the other one looks professionally taken. Very flat lighting, face on, nothing done with hair, drab attire etc.

I believe this is an old story and in fact now the guy has been offered treatment that would in fact break down the crystals but he's refused it purely because his income is based on him being a showcase for people to come and see. There was a documentary about the chap on Channel 4.

Re: Jennifer Hawkins poses nude and unairbrushed I prefer the natural to the 'cosmetically correct'. EDIT: Plus, I don't care for someone else making decisions on my behalf as to what looks nice. That crease on her hip that they mentioned looks great, if some doofus thought it should have been...

As they're in the business of getting viewers, I don't think there's any doubt that they want to grab people's attention. If that means they highlight an unusual example should anyone be surprised? There is such a thing as 'exposure fatigue', you can raise awareness of situations with the...

Perhaps because it's that much less likely to happen, or is that not a good enough reason? The News groups are a bit fickle like that.

This is a real photo taken by satellite yesterday.

Unseamly, even.

I don't think there's any confusion in what was being said.

Then in this case, it's those who believe in a God.

If I target my enemies is that inclusive of many or singling out the individual?

They were going for a catch all declaration. It can be taken to include Allah, Buddha, Zeus and all the others.

I wasn't disqualifying other religions, just making it clear that Christians were included.

I know that's what conservatism prefers but the way they're making it sound is akin to everyone for himself with no governance.

So if you're only included in something you're not targeted? Targeting and isolating are two different things.

I think you're probably overstating the case because you're now describing Anarchy.

"No offense"? Hmm. Benefit of doubt given. It's after statements like this that I remind myself of the old adage, 'No man is an island'. (I've got no beef with 7th graders either.)

The full slogan is, "There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life." The latter part implies that by believing in God you will suffer from worry, subsequently dismissing faith as unhealthy, it also suggests your life is on hold, I'd say that targets Christians. These ads were...

I'm afraid there are Mrs J. In Blighty no less.

I'm not so sure we're talking about the same thing. I'm referring to international standing based on who a country elects.

To be fair, race does come into play don't you think? In hindsight, **** Germany's reputation and image is very much connected to segregation and alleged ethnic disparities. I know from what news coverage I watched during Obama's election, that there was a lot more hope amongst African nations...

This is OUTRAGEOUS! Bank bail outs I can stomach, manufacturing going to the dogs I may lose ***** over, Climate Change disunity I'll ignore but THIS, this is beyond the pale!

I would have to agree that Clinton did seem quite popular amongst Europeans despite his philandering.

I think Noeline's made some good points if you read a few posts back.

Don't be suckered into that mindset, it offers nothing. <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VwRCBHhyrAA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed...

I can never understand why folks are told to stop replying because they argue with someone here. Arguing is not bickering or quarreling, it is healthy and progressive and moves ideas around. Those who start making the suggestion of "stop replying" are probably more keen to back track out of an...

I think we're all preaching to the converted now folks.

hahaha Yes! and sling-backs and sequins for that matter too!

Fighting for his cause I guess.

I see, this is all about garnering fans, eh? ;) I'm a fully signed up anarchist you see, so I can't vote. They'd revoke my membership. :)

Because I know what you did with that monkey, that's why! :eek: No seriously, I was in China once and this fanged ***** leapt out at my friend and sank it's chops into her forearm. It never broke the skin but just goes to show what maltreated ******* can do (it was chained up and looked under...

Stay away from me Willy!

haha I don't know if you're serious or yanking my chain but I got a reality check a month or so ago when I discovered "Cosplay" and found out what and who were involved. I'm obviously not down with the ****. I never imagined you could feel old at 29 (!)

No offence but what's a girl like you reading something like this for? (I'm a traditional sort so go easy on me)

ditto.

Like I say, Tiger Woods has. Trust me, when he finally surfaces, you'll see the difference.

What I meant was that this is a site centering around pinups and the like, why should it seem out of place if one of the stories making up a thread is of a playboy model?

Don't you think that's slightly ironic, I mean this after all is a porn site dedicated to scantily clad girls.

Diva, what gives? You're sounding bitter. Why are you bring race into it anyway?

ditto.