Rey C.

• 

  Jagger69

• Apr 24, 2013

Thanks for the rep, Rey!

• 

  Lolita_Borgia

• Apr 6, 2013

Spank you for the rep babe *kisses* xXx :lips:

• 

  Secretease

• Feb 2, 2013

Thanks for the rep B)

• 

  Marlo Manson

• Jan 26, 2013

Thanks for the Rep my friend. :bowdown: :glugglug: (Life won't be the same without Proposition Joe, that certainly sucks bigtime!!)

• 

  ApolloBalboa

• Jan 20, 2013

I wanted to give you rep for your last post in "pornstar has a kid", but I can't. I'd say it's worthy of "Post of the Year."

• 

  SpexyAshleigh

• Jan 12, 2013

I must be reppin you more than anyone else because I went to rep you again and it told me to rep others before I could rep you again lol. Shame there aren't that many good posters on here to rep le sigh.

S

• S

  Sam Fisher

• Jan 7, 2013

Thank you for the Rep. :glugglug:

• 

  georges

• Dec 24, 2012

merry christmas and happy new year to you :glugglug:

• 

  Jagger69

• Dec 10, 2012

Thanks for the rep, Rey!

• 

  xfire

• Dec 9, 2012

Thanks for the rep. Yeah, I remember United We Stand America, and I supported most of their agenda. I think Perot had a lot to do with why Clinton was more of a centrist.

• 

  fulltimeperv

• Nov 28, 2012

i dig all your posts!! add me

• 

  Deepcover

• Nov 18, 2012

Well in that case again I am sorry I took your post the wrong way. The situation is finally put to rest and I have understood to move on. Have a good one.

• 

  Deepcover

• Nov 18, 2012

If you were joking, well then I don't take sarcastic posts very well. I'm sorry too but is there not one serious member on this damn website?

• 

  ApolloBalboa

• Nov 13, 2012

Thanks very much for your kind words and wisdom. I very much enjoy reading your posts because you seem to know what you're talking about and you contribute well to most issues. :hatsoff:

• 

  mikexmoran

• Nov 4, 2012

Couldn't rep you again, but glad you took it the right way.

• 

  mikexmoran

• Oct 8, 2012

Good post on the Jack Welch Thread. I was going one way and I guess the board was the other.
My point is that it is ok to challenge the LBS numbers - they are rule based and those assumptions may not tell what we want to see.
Did Obama have the numbers tainted? Doubt it.
Nobody seemed to latch onto what I was saying, but I was posting it in a board about Welch.

L

• L

  lurkingdirk

• Sep 26, 2012

Ha, thanks for the rep. Clearly Roald didn't get the reference, but I'm glad someone did!

:hatsoff:

• 

  mikexmoran

• Sep 25, 2012

Thanks for the rep!

• 

  PlumpRump

• Sep 20, 2012

Thx for the rep, Rey Rey!

• 

  xfire

• Sep 20, 2012

Thanks for the rep. I thought it was a dead ringer. :1orglaugh