Ethics: would it be 'okay' to eat a Pokemon? Why?
- Thread starter Torre82
- Start date
They actually ate some species of pokemon in the games, i guess it isn't a bigger moral dilemma than eating actual *******. It would make sense if you think about overpopulation of pokemon, environmental imbalance, etc
Mr. Daystar
In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
As long as you take it in season, why not.
Now a question of my own, regarding ***********. Fish like Northern Pike, and Large Mouth Bass, prey on Bluegill, and other smaller bait fish. They also eat frogs, they are carnivores. So, does it make them cannibals, because they are eating other fish, or does it have to be the same specific species? Obviously this same question applies to land *******, such as bears and big cats. Or any ****** that has sub species.
Now a question of my own, regarding ***********. Fish like Northern Pike, and Large Mouth Bass, prey on Bluegill, and other smaller bait fish. They also eat frogs, they are carnivores. So, does it make them cannibals, because they are eating other fish, or does it have to be the same specific species? Obviously this same question applies to land *******, such as bears and big cats. Or any ****** that has sub species.
Mr. Daystar
In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
Rule 34 dude. I've seen things, I will never unsee
I think .. it's perfectly fine.
Within the conscience of the person.
What's the way to act it, anthropomorphic traits? Those would make it more difficult for some.Or easier.
Do whatever you wanna do, just don't hurt anyone. Does the ***** feel pain? Emotions? Are you hungry? Horny? Survival of the fittest.
With that said, the fittest seems to be the pokemon. .. The Pokemons that can light you on fire or electrify you, etc. So.
Within the conscience of the person.
What's the way to act it, anthropomorphic traits? Those would make it more difficult for some.Or easier.
Do whatever you wanna do, just don't hurt anyone. Does the ***** feel pain? Emotions? Are you hungry? Horny? Survival of the fittest.
With that said, the fittest seems to be the pokemon. .. The Pokemons that can light you on fire or electrify you, etc. So.
IMO I think you'd have to be eating the same species (or a very, very close subspecies which is almost physically identical) to be considered cannibals. Monkey brains are a part of Chinese cuisine, but I don't think we call that ***********.
So my question to you: Is a gyarados eating a magicarp considered ***********?
One hand, they evolve from each other.
But I don't think you can consider a carp as the same species as a flying dragon...
It is *********** in the broad sense, absolutely. Same as all of us having the generally same .. oh what's the word.. LUCA?
Last universal common ancestor.
If we all came from the same thing, then yes. But that also makes plants on par, no?
Same sandbox. Methinks it then comes down to how we identify with them - we only really feel bad about fellow predators. More of the hunter types. (Eyes in front, expressive faces, you **** us back, etc)
I dunno, i guess i just don't feel too terribly bad about any of it. Cuz if it wasn't natural, then ppl wouldn't do it, or keep a wonderment about it. (***********)
It makes us feel alive to know that there's a killer around every corner? In every household? Can't trust anyone? Must eat... That fish that talks?
But whatevs. It turns into the dragon. Dragon eats it's young. Creatures here do the same.
Last universal common ancestor.
If we all came from the same thing, then yes. But that also makes plants on par, no?
Same sandbox. Methinks it then comes down to how we identify with them - we only really feel bad about fellow predators. More of the hunter types. (Eyes in front, expressive faces, you **** us back, etc)
I dunno, i guess i just don't feel too terribly bad about any of it. Cuz if it wasn't natural, then ppl wouldn't do it, or keep a wonderment about it. (***********)
It makes us feel alive to know that there's a killer around every corner? In every household? Can't trust anyone? Must eat... That fish that talks?
But whatevs. It turns into the dragon. Dragon eats it's young. Creatures here do the same.
Mr. Daystar
In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
I have no idea what those are. I'll have to read up on them. But thanks for the answer, I was just curious, after watching some ****** documentaries. I wish I could find "walking With Dinosaurs", on one of the streaming channels we have/had.
There's always evidence and forensics is a stand-alone, multi-disciplinary vocation - they're pretty good at catching the bad guys these days, breaking and taking. You want to lose it all because you couldn't control/behave yourself? alas - all the time in the world to think about that now.
They don't think it be like it is, but it do.There's always evidence and forensics is a stand-alone, multi-disciplinary vocation - they're pretty good at catching the bad guys these days, breaking and taking. You want to lose it all because you couldn't control/behave yourself? alas - all the time in the world to think about that now.
Attachments
Here are the two. Obviously this is a fantastical example, but it's still fun to think about for discussion.
IRL there are examples of related species looking very different too. You've probably heard the one about lobsters and cockroaches belonging to the same ******.
Did they ever show an actual non-pokemon ****** ever in the series?
I haven't watched every episode, so I can't say for sure, l but I'm pretty sure every "******" in the world was a pokemon.
And I do know they've shown the characters eat meat.
So it's clear there's no moral dilemma eating them IMO
Mr. Daystar
In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
I'm going to say it's not. If a lobster ate a cockroach, you wouldn't call it ***********, just like hornets eating honey bees. I would guess, a Muskie, or Northern Pike would eat a Walleye, and they are all from the Pickerel ******.
Perhaps. But all Pokemon, save for insects.. have a reasonably high 'iq' compared to real world counterparts. And most can at least day their name and variations of it, to pseudo communicate.
Irl if a ****** we eat could wander over and make a half ass sentence "moo? Moo muh mo-moo?"it would, imo, cease to be mindless as you can give it commands that it follows or not, depending on if it liked you.. and defend itself, wouldn't that change things in major ways?
Accordingly, each other ****** would be that much more aware of each other, right?
Irl if a ****** we eat could wander over and make a half ass sentence "moo? Moo muh mo-moo?"it would, imo, cease to be mindless as you can give it commands that it follows or not, depending on if it liked you.. and defend itself, wouldn't that change things in major ways?
Accordingly, each other ****** would be that much more aware of each other, right?
They've shown actual fish once
\just asks a 'friend' to write a short lecture
Good day! Today, we will be discussing the topic of whether it is ethical to eat Pokemon. As we all know, Pokemon are fictional creatures that have become a part of popular culture. However, it is important to examine the ethical implications of consuming them.
Firstly, it is worth noting that Pokemon are intelligent and sentient creatures. They have their own thoughts, feelings, and personalities. In many cases, they are portrayed as being able to communicate with humans and form strong bonds with them. Eating them would not only be cruel, but it would also be disrespectful to their unique nature and characteristics.
Secondly, many Pokemon are endangered species. Eating them would only exacerbate their vulnerability and push them closer to extinction. As humans, we have a responsibility to protect endangered species and ensure their survival for future generations. Consuming them would be a ********* of this responsibility.
Thirdly, it is important to consider the cultural significance of Pokemon. Many people around the world have developed a deep affection for Pokemon, and they are a beloved part of many cultural traditions. Eating Pokemon could be seen as a disrespectful act that goes against the values and beliefs of these communities.
Finally, we should also take into account the potential health risks associated with eating Pokemon. As fictional creatures, we do not know how they would affect the human body. Eating them could potentially lead to unknown health problems and risks.
In conclusion, eating Pokemon would be unethical for a variety of reasons. It would be cruel to consume intelligent and sentient creatures, harmful to the environment, disrespectful to cultural values, and potentially hazardous to human health. As responsible individuals, we should refrain from consuming Pokemon and instead appreciate their unique qualities from a distance. Thank you for your attention.
Good day! Today, we will be discussing the topic of whether it is ethical to eat Pokemon. As we all know, Pokemon are fictional creatures that have become a part of popular culture. However, it is important to examine the ethical implications of consuming them.
Firstly, it is worth noting that Pokemon are intelligent and sentient creatures. They have their own thoughts, feelings, and personalities. In many cases, they are portrayed as being able to communicate with humans and form strong bonds with them. Eating them would not only be cruel, but it would also be disrespectful to their unique nature and characteristics.
Secondly, many Pokemon are endangered species. Eating them would only exacerbate their vulnerability and push them closer to extinction. As humans, we have a responsibility to protect endangered species and ensure their survival for future generations. Consuming them would be a ********* of this responsibility.
Thirdly, it is important to consider the cultural significance of Pokemon. Many people around the world have developed a deep affection for Pokemon, and they are a beloved part of many cultural traditions. Eating Pokemon could be seen as a disrespectful act that goes against the values and beliefs of these communities.
Finally, we should also take into account the potential health risks associated with eating Pokemon. As fictional creatures, we do not know how they would affect the human body. Eating them could potentially lead to unknown health problems and risks.
In conclusion, eating Pokemon would be unethical for a variety of reasons. It would be cruel to consume intelligent and sentient creatures, harmful to the environment, disrespectful to cultural values, and potentially hazardous to human health. As responsible individuals, we should refrain from consuming Pokemon and instead appreciate their unique qualities from a distance. Thank you for your attention.
