James Woods Locked Out of Twitter Over Tweet That ******** Rules
- Thread starter georges
- Start date
When registered on Twitter, he accepted the software license agreement. Then if he ******** the same rules he had agreed to, then whatever the consequences he had it coming.
If you don't like Twitter's rules, don't register.But if you do register, you agree to their rules. You can't register and then comply about their rules.
If you don't like Twitter's rules, don't register.But if you do register, you agree to their rules. You can't register and then comply about their rules.
You are so predictable, so would it have been a Liberal who would have said a bad anything, he wouldn't have been censored and don't even bother to tell me the opposite because you know that I am right. This is not about rules, this is about bias and censorship. People from big companies like Google, Twitter and Facebook are clearly double standard and highly hypocritical liberal leftists.
Ok, I won't tell you other way. I'm just gonna ask you to prove that.
I mean.. *scratches neck* I dont hear liberals threaten ******** and mayhem, so much as nag and boycott.
A difference of civility in a civil society.
Alex Jones could be the guy that never got into a fight, but as a propoganda machine.. he incites others into it.
Woods is in the same position, as a conservative with tons of followers.
Or to think of it from the government perspective..
"Among the numerous whackos in the world, this guy has 200,000+ fan(atics)... call up one of our damage control/shell companies to send a message"
Being on either side is fine, as long as we are solo and dont start getting a following for our personal brand of justice.
A'course, on the flipside.. he could very well be a government conservative shill, sure. He pushes the narrative whether he is loud or silenced.
So, eh. Your side is winning either way on this one, G. Free publicity in a public forum that is owned by government think tanks and used primarily as communication by the American president? I wouldnt blame the leftists, I'd say this is a rightist mindgame.
******* rules, overturn the decision, keep spouting your propoganda.
That Jussie Smollett guy failed. J. Woods got a win.
A difference of civility in a civil society.
Alex Jones could be the guy that never got into a fight, but as a propoganda machine.. he incites others into it.
Woods is in the same position, as a conservative with tons of followers.
Or to think of it from the government perspective..
"Among the numerous whackos in the world, this guy has 200,000+ fan(atics)... call up one of our damage control/shell companies to send a message"
Being on either side is fine, as long as we are solo and dont start getting a following for our personal brand of justice.
A'course, on the flipside.. he could very well be a government conservative shill, sure. He pushes the narrative whether he is loud or silenced.
So, eh. Your side is winning either way on this one, G. Free publicity in a public forum that is owned by government think tanks and used primarily as communication by the American president? I wouldnt blame the leftists, I'd say this is a rightist mindgame.
******* rules, overturn the decision, keep spouting your propoganda.
That Jussie Smollett guy failed. J. Woods got a win.
James Woods Celebrates Trump’s ‘Slam Dunk Victory’ with Video Roasting ‘the Liberal Press’
Premium Link Upgrade
Dan Rather Runs Smack into James Woods on Collusion & the Exchange Is Priceless
Premium Link Upgrade
Ordinary Woman’s Tweet to James Woods May End in Gary Sinise Getting Medal of Freedom
Premium Link Upgrade
Premium Link Upgrade
Dan Rather Runs Smack into James Woods on Collusion & the Exchange Is Priceless
Premium Link Upgrade
Ordinary Woman’s Tweet to James Woods May End in Gary Sinise Getting Medal of Freedom
Premium Link Upgrade
Similar threads
