It is the best decision he could have made. Now if only Clemens & Bonds would do the honourable thing and come clean too, maybe baseball can get rid of this black cloud hanging over its head.
It is the best decision he could have made. Now if only Clemens & Bonds would do the honourable thing and come clean too, maybe baseball can get rid of this black cloud hanging over its head.
When they tell the truth they lose their endorsements.
And, people say people are so willing to forgive?
So, how many do you think are going to say anything?
Alex Rodriguez already has more money than he knows what to do with.
So, losing his endorsements won't hit him so hard.
Also, when did someone come up with concrete evidence that Bonds or anyone else has used steroids?
I think that the more they deny it, the chances of them going to the Hall Of Fame get smaller and smaller. Look at Mcgwire for example, if I'm not mistaken, he got even less votes this year than last year! :rofl::1orglaughSo, if Clemens, Bonds, McGwire (etc) all came clean about their steroid use, should they get into the Hall of Fame just for being honest? Is it the steroid use that people are really upset about, or is it the honesty, or lack thereof?
"Retested Bonds sample positive" http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3881897
A urine sample that Barry Bonds provided as part of the anonymous testing that baseball conducted in 2003...
Although the sample did not test positive under baseball’s program, it was retested by federal authorities after they seized it in a 2004 raid,
The people spoke on condition of anonymity
While HPAC can make recommendations to the Office of the Commissioner regarding punishment, it has no power to discipline players for violations of the drug policy, except to place them in the appropriate treatment programs. Such authority belongs to the Office of the Commissioner.
Article
So, an old sample that was not tested by the proper authorities,
and the people who spoke on the matter wanted anonymity.
The feds don't have jurisdiction in this matter.
They will need a new sample and the test will have to be conducted under Major League Baseball's authority.
You're obviously not someone who's going to be convinced by anything like normal evidence, but for the rest of us, federal investigators are "proper authorities". What the heck does jurisdiction have to do with it? There is a positive test that is concretely linked to Bonds. Stop moving the goal post when you don't like where the evidence goes. What baseball does has nothing to do with it, a positive test is a positive test and that's all I need to form an opinion about the guy, and it should be all you need as well. :dunno:
When they tell the truth they lose their endorsements.
And, people say people are so willing to forgive?
So, how many do you think are going to say anything?
Alex Rodriguez already has more money than he knows what to do with.
So, losing his endorsements won't hit him so hard.
Also, when did someone come up with concrete evidence that Bonds or anyone else has used steroids?