Women who are Similar to Mattel's Legendary Barbie

I have been cruzing around looking for a woman that has the generaly accepted measurments of barbie, that being 39-18-33 @ 5 ft. 9 in. Of course this is imposible.

The first one to come to mind was Briana Banks. I find however that she is most like barbie in her height and that she is quite a bit larger in diamiter than Barbie in middle and slightly smaller in the bottom and top (36-26-30). Dispite the middle issue, she really does look like a barbie doll, and actually being tall with dimensions even close to 39-18-33 is what really is amazing. I don't know what Barbie's cup size would be but I think Briana has her beat with DD in her corner.

The closest measurements I could find are those of Holly Halston. Given, Halston's height is WAY off at a mear 5 ft. but she has unreal dimensions of 36-19-32! All in all only 4 in. off total (Briana's total off would be 14 in. for those interested) But when height is taken into account Briana is off 15 in. total and Halston jumps to being 13 in.

Another candidate for havine a Barbie like figure is T.J Hart. Hart is only 1 in. shorter than barbie would be. She is 3 in. smaller in the bust and 2 in. off in the middle. With a final measurement of 26 in. she falls the shortest of Barbies rediculous "standard" in this area. All in all an effort (unintential as it may be) that falls only 13 in. short, or long as the case may be, of matching Barbie.

Elektra Knight at 5 ft. 4 in. & 36-19-28 is off a total of 14 in.

Staying with the measuremtns only Halston has the clear advantage of only being off a total of 4 in. while the next closest of the othere three ladys I have mentioned is Ms. Hart at 9 in. off in the measurements.

So that was fun. In my mind its between Hart and Halston for closest to Barbie's measurements, but I would love some aditional ladys to compare...anyone interested in bringing someone to the table?
 
For reference,

Mattel's Barbie - 5 ft. 9 in. @ 39(?)-18-33
Briana Banks - 5 ft. 10 in. @ 36-26-30
Holly Halston - 5 ft. 0 in. @ 36-19-32
T. J. Hart - 5 ft. 8 in. @ 36-20-26
Elektra Knight - 5ft. 4 in. @ 36-19-28
 
Pamela Anderson - 5 ft. 7 in (2 in Disperate)

36-22-34 (8 in Disperate)

Total Diffirence from Barbie = 10 in.

Interesting, I know I have herd Pamela referanced as the worlds living Barbie replica, but I had no idea just how similar physicly she is to a projected human sized Barbie Doll. Amazing!
 
Chrissy Moran - 5 Ft. 2 in (7 in Disperate)

34(D)-23-35 (12 in. Disperate)

Total Diffirence from Barbie = 19 in.!

Well the populat Ms. Moran proves that you don't need to be anything like Barbie to be hot.
 
Sunrise Adams - 5 ft. 7 in. (2 in Disperate)

36(B)-24-36 (12 in. Disperate)

Total Diffirence from Barbie = 14 in.

This favorite starlet of mine whose dimensions are the legendary 36-24-36 shure isn't a Barbie clone...
 
Looks like Pamela Anderson and Amanda Seldin are doing well at 10 in. off of Barbie's dimensions, while Tera Patrick & Lisa Ann are right beind at 11 in. off.

Matching just the measurements of diamiter without matching height favors Holly Halston (Holly Troy) & Lisa Ann. Both are significantly shorter than Barbie would be, but match her diametrical dimesions the best of any ladys I have thus found information for.

I'm favoring Pamela Anderson as my pick for most similar so far. Mostly because she is known in pop culture as Barbie's human incarnation anyways, so being only 10 in. off along with only one other woman is unmatched in my mind.
 
Last edited:
You do realize that if a real woman were actually the proportions that Barbie is that she would fall over because waist couldn't support her top half and she wouldn't be able to menstrate because she would have so little body fat that it's unhealthy....
 
I have read that acording to some Finish University that her bodyfat woulnd't fall within the range that she could menstrate, but I am unaware of the fact that her body would be unable to suport itself. Actually I would tend to belive the later and not the former. It would seem that humans stay upright through more dimensionaly challanging physiques than Barbie would have. But it is possible.
 
13 posts into the thread now and only 2 are NOT by the author, within 10 hours. LMFAO :D :tongue:

Barbie sucks. I never thought she was cute. She looks absurd, and as Foxy mentioned, completely unrealistic.

There should be a Bobbi Eden doll -- IMO the hottest all-natural babe/pornstar out there!! And those eyes...they can melt steel...

You're SMOKIN', Bobster! :) :nanner: :banana:
 
i heard in real life , barbie would be over 7 ft tall
 

McRocket

Banned
P The D said:
I have read that acording to some Finish University that her bodyfat woulnd't fall within the range that she could menstrate

This is what they do in Finnish University?

:)
 

McRocket

Banned
Nightfly said:

Barbie sucks. I never thought she was cute. She looks absurd, and as Foxy mentioned, completely unrealistic.
There should be a Bobbi Eden doll -- IMO the hottest all-natural babe/pornstar out there!! And those eyes...they can melt steel...
You're SMOKIN', Bobster! :) :nanner: :banana:


Man, when you suck up; you REALLY suck up.

:)

Personally I'd prefer Barbie - if she could exist. 39-18-33? Ah, yeah. I'll take Barbie. So what if she can't menstrate - we'll adopt. And she won't have to go through periods. :)
 
mcrocket said:
Man, when you suck up; you REALLY suck up.

:)

Personally I'd prefer Barbie - if she could exist. 39-18-33? Ah, yeah. I'll take Barbie. So what if she can't menstrate - we'll adopt. And she won't have to go through periods. :)
lol she wont have periods... she instead can be perminantly pissed off
 
mcrocket said:
Man, when you suck up; you REALLY suck up.

:)

Personally I'd prefer Barbie - if she could exist. 39-18-33? Ah, yeah. I'll take Barbie. So what if she can't menstrate - we'll adopt. And she won't have to go through periods. :)

With an 18 inch waist I would be afraid of her snapping in two when a strong gust of wind hit her. :1orglaugh
 
Top