Weird Talk!

[Ichi-chan]

If you were offered to wander the world killing murderers,(not defense murderers, but also children who will grow up to be murderers) and not be able to be killed, or harmed in anyway, would you accept?

Would you be able to go and just kill people? Would you be able to go and kill children knowing that they would grow up to be a murderer?

 

[dick van cock]

Death penalty is wrong. Every Western country has abandoned it, save for the USA.

Capital punishment is morally debatable, its "execution" (sic!) is flawed.

I am glad to be a European. The US wouldn't be eligible to join the EU... we don't accept members countries who condone capital punishment.

So, the answer to your question is: NO!

 

[Friday on my mind]

Death penalty is wrong. Every Western country has abandoned it, save for the USA.

Capital punishment is morally debatable, its "execution" (sic!) is flawed.

I am glad to be a European. The US wouldn't be eligible to join the EU... we don't accept members countries who condone capital punishment.

So, the answer to your question is: NO!

We are getting there slowly Dick,some states like mine will never execute anyone again.Some others ironically in the area known as the bible belt are going to be slower to realize how flawed the system of capital punishment is.But things like the amnesty project who has gotten people off death row with DNA evidence is constantly reminding us how flawed it really is and soon hopefully there will be a national ban.

 

[Legzman]

If you were offered to wander the world killing murderers,(not defense murderers, but also children who will grow up to be murderers) and not be able to be killed, or harmed in anyway, would you accept?

Would you be able to go and just kill people? Would you be able to go and kill children knowing that they would grow up to be a murderer?

Since you put it that way!
Fuck yes!:violent::ak47:

 

[bigbadbrody]

Death penalty is wrong. Every Western country has abandoned it, save for the USA.

Capital punishment is morally debatable, its "execution" (sic!) is flawed.

I am glad to be a European. The US wouldn't be eligible to join the EU... we don't accept members countries who condone capital punishment.

So, the answer to your question is: NO!

I don't agree with the death penalty. I want "Tit For Tat", that is if somebody murders someone else, they should be murdered themselves.

Whatever crime the bad guy is found guilty of should be his punishment, that is if it is to somebody else.

 

[free4440273]

I don't agree with the death penalty. I want "Tit For Tat", that is if somebody murders someone else, they should be murdered themselves.

Whatever crime the bad guy is found guilty of should be his punishment, that is if it is to somebody else.

on a slightly lighter note, that could be the basis for a new game on the freeones board - Tit for Tat

 

[bigbadbrody]

on a slightly lighter note, that could be the basis for a new game on the freeones board - Tit for Tat

and how would that work?

 

[Calm]

I don't care about killing people but I wouldn't want a job where I have to travel, not for me.

I watched a movie with a similar concept. A dad tells his 2 kids God talks to him and shows him who is evil and who isn't and he takes his 2 kids on a killing spree claiming everyone he kills is actually a demon (one is a child molestor etc). But it raises a big question, would you believe your own dad on this thing and help him commit these murders?

 

[ChefChiTown]

If you were offered to wander the world killing murderers,(not defense murderers, but also children who will grow up to be murderers) and not be able to be killed, or harmed in anyway, would you accept?

Would you be able to go and just kill people? Would you be able to go and kill children knowing that they would grow up to be a murderer?

So...you want to know if people want to be a superhero hitman?

 

[Ichi-chan]

No, lets say a demon offered you this deal. Like you won't go fatigue, and you'd just be non stop killing. Would you accept?

Sounds like a good movie.

 

[Jagger69]

In Texas, we put more people to death than anywhere else in the "civilized" world. Since the death penalty was reinstated in Texas in 1974, 379 human beings have been put to death. Our highest totals were achieved during the years when George W. Bush was governor (1995-2000) when a total of 154 inmates were executed. Bush went out with a bang before he was elected to the presidency and posted a record year in 2000 when he signed a total of 40 death warrants.

Every time an inmate is put to death, the warrant is carried out in the name of the people of the state of Texas. So....thanks for the offer but, in all honestly, I've already murdered enough murderers.

 

[jamrak]

it is hard to imagine this theoretical situation. children who will be murderers... without a chance to change the way they will go, it is too much incredible condition. That supposes that some kinda *extra-magic-exceptional* ability exists: ability to predict the future. but at the same time, there is no *quite an ordinary* ability to change something in the life/upbringing of that children to prevent them from becoming murderers, already knowing their inclination for crime. That is just absurdly IMO. That is similar to the supposition, that a doctor knows that his patient has susceptibility towards diabetes, and due to that fact decides to kill him, instead of performing prophylaxis.

as for the other part of the question, I am sure that some assholes got to be killed for the shit they had done to other people. there are such an assholes in this world, that all that progressive philanthropic charitable & whatever-else-it-can-be-called views do not stand up to any criticism!
sometimes I think that some people are just up in the clouds, talking about cancellation of capital punishment... just read some criminal chronicle of events!

So, coming back to the subj, indisputably, if I ever face that choice - to kill a bastard, or not to kill, I will do it. but only when it is about people who had already done some deadly sins, not about children who "will grow up to be..."

 

[ChefChiTown]

I don't care about killing people but I wouldn't want a job where I have to travel, not for me.

I watched a movie with a similar concept. A dad tells his 2 kids God talks to him and shows him who is evil and who isn't and he takes his 2 kids on a killing spree claiming everyone he kills is actually a demon (one is a child molestor etc). But it raises a big question, would you believe your own dad on this thing and help him commit these murders?

I think I saw that movie. Was it Frailty with Bill Paxton and Matthew McConaughey?

 

[Ichi-chan]

Screw the death penalty aspect of it, fuck politics. Just a weird talk, if you were given the supernatural right to kill all murderers, would you accept the deal?

 

[jamrak]

if you were given the supernatural right to kill all murderers, would you accept the deal?

to kill all murderers - no
some of them - yes

because murder itself is not a reason. under certain circumstances it can be discharged, or punished not as capital punishment. and mentioned "defence murder" is not the only case. and btw, some assholes who had not kill anybody can be even worse than those, who had. for example if a motherfucker raped 25 teenage girls, and cut their fingers at the end, but left them alive, he deserves to be killed much more than a guy, who had killed someone in a vengeance for killing his mother/brother/wife etc.

 

[swaki]

nope...caus after i had kill all the kids and frustrated wives id had to kill my self for killing all the peopel...and fuck that when im dead i cant get drunk so FUCK THAT

 

[YMIHERE]

You would be arrested for murder and spend eternity in jail. You can't be kill or harmed but you can be restrained by a maximum security prison cell.

 

[senob44]

If you were offered to wander the world killing murderers,(not defense murderers, but also children who will grow up to be murderers) and not be able to be killed, or harmed in anyway, would you accept?

Would you be able to go and just kill people? Would you be able to go and kill children knowing that they would grow up to be a murderer?

Well, I think we figured out this has nothing to do with the death penalty? What the OP is saying is, "would you go around killing future murderers before they even do it?" Thus, you would be saving the lives of their future victims. I would enjoy this, provided (as stated) that I wouldn't be killed or harmed in any way for what I was doing. I wouldn't want to be jailed either for that matter.

This idea is kind of like the movie "Minority Report".

 

[Friday on my mind]

How did this turn into a discussion on the death penalty? What the OP is saying is, "would you go around killing future murderers before they even do it?" Thus, you would be saving the lives of their future victims. I would enjoy this, provided (as stated) that I wouldn't be killed or harmed in any way for what I was doing. I wouldn't want to be jailed either for that matter.

This idea is kind of like the movie "Minority Report".

I saw "minority report" but I forget didn't that system turn out to be corrupt too?

 

[senob44]

I saw "minority report" but I forget didn't that system turn out to be corrupt too?

Yes, indeed your memory serves you well. Even if we buy into the idea of being able to spot "future murderers", it would probably not work anyway because of people's own personal goals. All you need is one corrupt individual who has this "vision" to see the future, and things can get way out of control. In the movie, sometimes the ones who can "see the future" disagree on someone. In the movie's case this happens to one of the officers who works in the unit. So he goes and tries to prove that they were wrong about his "future crime".