In 1998, the U.S. Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft, maintaining that the world's largest maker of software held an ******* monopoly and stifled competition. Microsoft was found to use its monopoly power to harm competitors.
This leads me to the question, "Couldn't the Justice Department then file a lawsuit against the United States Government for its blatant monopoly status in postal delivery?"
The first official notice of a postal service appeared in the Colonies in 1639 to handle the correspondence between the colonists and England, and between the colonies. The establishment of a central postal organization in the Colonies came after 1691 when Thomas Neale received a 21-year grant from the British Crown for a North American postal service. In 1789, following the adoption of the U.S. Constitution, the office of the Postmaster General was created. At the time, there were only 75 post offices and a post office staff totaling just over 30 people - including the Postmaster General.
Today, the United States Postal Service employs nearly 800,000 workers (mostly unionized) in roughly 38,000 post offices. They deliver 200 billion pieces of mail annually. Its annual revenues of more than $65 billion would rank it number 11 among the Fortune 500 companies. Nevertheless, it is not its sheer size, volume or revenues through which it earns its monopoly status. Rather, it is the unfair advantages it enjoys that private companies do not.
For instance, the U.S. Postal Service pays no corporate income tax, no state or local property tax, no business or profess-ional licensing tax and no business franchise fees. It can borrow from the U.S. Treasury at below-market rates and it pays no dividends to shareholders. It is exempt from zoning, customs and tax laws by which its private-sector competitors must abide. By law, it maintains exclusive rights to deliver first-class mail, and - through laws known as Private Express Statutes - no private entity is allowed to deliver a package or envelope for less than $3 or twice the cost of a first-class letter.
This taxpayer-funded, legally protected enterprise exemplifies the very definition of a monopoly, and yet it has somehow survived numerous attempts to dismantle it. It has become so brazenly abusive in its monopolistic status that, in 1997, it attempted to extend its reach to achieve legislation that would have granted it authority to purchase '' such other obligations or securities as it deems appropriate, if such investment is closely related to Postal Service operations as determined by... [its] Board of Governors.
