Ukraine

Exactly two main points on costly for both sides and foolish. But at the same time NATO has to show some teeth now instead of paper tiger talks with securing the borders from the Baltic and Caucasus that have NATO members.

But America should not be relied on to do all the heavy lifting with troops and equipment as this a Europe problem.

Again, It would be best to not station many NATO forces in the Baltic states. NATO Forces would low the Russians down, but they would not defeat a Russian invasion off the Baltic states. Stop watching American cable news. Putin is not going to attack the Baltics. A major war with NATO would cost him job, and probably his life. The Russian people don't care about the Baltics. They do not want portentially tens of thousands of their sons and daughters dying in a war for the Baltic states.
 
France puts warship delivery to Russia on hold
AP 6 hours ago


PARIS (AP) — Responding to international pressure, France suspended the delivery of a warship to Russia at least until November amid security concerns over Moscow's role in the Ukraine crisis, officials said Wednesday.

The Vladivostok, the first of two Mistral-class helicopter carriers ordered by Russia, was due to be delivered next month as part of a 1.2 billion euro ($1.6 billion) contract — the biggest-ever sale of NATO weaponry to Moscow.

The second ship, named Sevastopol, ironically, after a port in the Russia-annexed Crimean Peninsula, has been slated for delivery next year.

In an announcement on the eve of a NATO summit in Wales, French President Francois Hollande's office called the fighting in eastern Ukraine "grave," and said Russia's recent actions harm "the foundations of security in Europe."

It also came after months of pressure on France from allies to suspend the sale because of tensions between Russia and Ukraine.

The U.S. State Department welcomed the move Wednesday.

"We certainly support their decision," spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters in Washington.

A French diplomatic official said a delivery wouldn't go through before November. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

Hollande said talk of a possible cease-fire in Ukraine wasn't enough to allow France to authorize the delivery of the Vladivostok. His office made no mention of the second warship.

France stopped short of cancelling the deal, suggesting that a change in Russia's behavior and handling of the Ukraine crisis could pave the way for the delivery at a later date.

The Vladivostok can carry 700 troops, 16 helicopter gunships, and up to 50 armored vehicles.

Analysts have said the warships would give Russia enhanced ability to move large numbers of troops and equipment, but were not game-changers for Moscow's already powerful military.

Months of resistance to suspending the deal testified in part to Paris' unwillingness to give up a contract worth more than 1 billion euros and thousands of jobs at a time of France's economic slump.

France has no guarantees about how the ships might be used, though the French defense export-control agency had already given the go-ahead for the delivery.

Ukrainian officials had insisted the delivery would violate the European Union's code of conduct. On Friday, the EU is set to toughen sanctions against Russia, after a recent worsening of the crisis in Ukraine.

A senior U.S. defense official said Washington welcomes France's decision, stressing the move reinforces the growing international resolve to hold Moscow accountable for its actions in Ukraine.

The official wasn't authorized to discuss the matter publicly so spoke on condition of anonymity.

A senior NATO official said, "Unfortunately, Russia has made this kind of decision the only possible decision, by its actions." He spoke during a pre-summit briefing in Wales where NATO officials answered reporters' questions on the condition that they not be identified.

As recently as July, Hollande said the deal was too costly to cancel, and even this week, his advisers had indicated that France was ready to go ahead with the first delivery. In July, the president said the Russians had paid for the ship, and France would have to reimburse Moscow if it canceled.
 
Western new media in general is incompetent and doesn't go against the government line on most stories; they fear public backlash and decreased ratings. BRICS countries are supporting Russia for good reason. The EU and the U. S. forced Viktor Yanukovych's resignation and that resignation did not follow Ukrainian law. The West support of the Ukrainian interim and Poroshenko governments campaigns in the East is terrible. The West knows Ukraine is misusing IMF money for its military campaign in the East, but Western leaders are being silent. The West is wants to paly Russian Roulette with the Russians. Putin is ruthless, but not close to vast major of the leaders of the former USSR. Kiev's leadership wouldn't be alive today, if they were facing the USSR.
 
We can match that and more.

With the 100K we brought back from Iraq means the Americans can supply at least 25K-50K in troops with the support in arms and supplies.

But the others in NATO have to add the other 75% more on our committed as Putin is on their front doors and not ours and we should not take the lead from a problem that has started 100 years ago in Eastern Europe. .

But but, if Putin gets China on his side then the shit will hit the fan big time with WWIII.

I don't see China getting involved in this at all as there would be no real benefit for them.
 
Viktor Yanukovych's resignation and that resignation did not follow Ukrainian law.

He up and fled the country in the middle of the night. What was parliament supposed to do, allow him to preside in absentia?
He was a two faced, corrupt puppet who did not represent majority will or opinion.
In a poll conducted 2 months later less than 5% of those polled wished to see him return to office.
I have family in Ukraine, very non political people, and even they couldn't stand the guy.
 
He up and fled the country in the middle of the night. What was parliament supposed to do, allow him to preside in absentia?
He was a two faced, corrupt puppet who did not represent majority will or opinion.
In a poll conducted 2 months later less than 5% of those polled wished to see him return to office.
I have family in Ukraine, very non political people, and even they couldn't stand the guy.

All of Ukraine's leaders have been crooks since it's independence from USSR. The Ukrainians oligarchs, Pro-Western political elites, Svoboda, and Right Sector political alliance have set the country back decades. Yanukovych was a crook, but would've been out office in 2015. The Right Sector forced all Yanukovych's allies out parliament basically by gunpoint. The Russians were going to put pressure on Ukraine, in 2015 when and if the Pro-Western coalition won the government. The Anti Russian campaign of the pro western coalition has failed miserably. Eastern Ukraine will basically be under Russian control for the foreseeable future. And Crimea is gone forever, NATO does not have the forces to retake Crimea from the Russians.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-kiev-regime-is-not-officially-a-neo-nazi-government/5384722

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28942065

Obama and Cameron were talking up the new 10,000 person strong NATO rapid response force today. A few months ago, the Russians had a military exercise that involved 150,000 European based troops.

All the Western financial sanctions my hurt Russia in the short run, but in the long Run they should be fine. I hope sanctions force Putin to make financial reforms, and they force him and his allies to top stealing money.
 
All of Ukraine's leaders have been crooks since it's independence from USSR.

On this we agree. But while until now the people have often expressed a rather defeatist ambivalence about that, they appear to have finally had enough.

Yanukovych was a crook, but would've been out office in 2015.

I don't think Ukraine had the luxury of waiting that long for different leadership. He was completely incapable of handling the situation. It remains to be seen just how fruitful that different leadership will turn out to be, but Yanukovych had to go.

And Crimea is gone forever

Sadly that does appear to be the case. :(

All the Western financial sanctions my hurt Russia in the short run, but in the long Run they should be fine. I hope sanctions force Putin to make financial reforms, and they force him and his allies to top stealing money.

Well, as I posted above, the Russian economy is already close to recession. How deep or lengthy one might be, if it arrives, is of course dependent on many variables.
Agree with you completely about forcing him and his allies to stop stealing money.
 
Well, as I posted above, the Russian economy is already close to recession. How deep or lengthy one might be, if it arrives, is of course dependent on many variables.
Agree with you completely about forcing him and his allies to stop stealing money.


Yes, Russia is probably going have a recession, but they still selling oil and natural gas to the EU. The Russia oil and natural gas fields have the lowest production costs in the world, and those revenue's make up 50-80 of the Russian federal budget. Plus, they have well over $400 billion dollars of foreign exchange reserves. If Putin stops his allies stealing by most reports a further $100 billion dollars will stay in Russia. The West governments on a propaganda to convince voters they are punishing severely Russia for its dealings in Ukraine, but that's far from the truth. The Russians government and oil companies can borrow money from China in a worse case scenario which almost $4 trillion dollars in foreign exchange reserves. The Chinese are investing heavily in Crimea, they building a major bridge at the Kerch Straits to connect Crimea to Russia.
 
Ukraine breaking the truce.


Civilian killed in Ukraine shelling despite truce

AP 2 hours ago


DONETSK, Ukraine (AP) — One civilian was killed in shelling in the Ukrainian port city of Mariupol and large explosions were heard near the airport in Donetsk early Sunday, raising fears that a cease-fire signed two days ago is on the verge of collapse.

Blasts from the area near the airport were powerful enough to be heard in downtown Donetsk, the main rebel-held city in eastern Ukraine.

A spokesman for Ukraine's national security council, Volodymyr Polyovyi, said at a briefing in Kiev that rebels appeared to have tried to attack the airport, which has been under the control of government troops since May and has come under unremitting attacks from pro-Russia separatist rebels since then.

The cease-fire had appeared to be holding for much of the day on Saturday, but shelling started late at night. A rebel statement said Ukrainian forces violated the cease-fire by firing on their positions in six locations on Saturday, including near the Donetsk airport. The statement said several rebels were killed.

Shelling also occurred overnight on the outskirts of the port city of Mariupol, where Ukrainian troops retain defensive lines against the rebels.

The city council there said one civilian was killed and a serviceman was wounded. A shell also destroyed a nearby gas station and the volunteer Azov Battalion said on Facebook that their positions were hit by Grad rockets, but did not give details.

Mariupol is located on the coast of the Sea of Azov, 115 kilometers (70 miles) south of Donetsk. Rebels recently opened a new front on the coast, leading to fears that they were trying to secure a land corridor between Russia and the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in March.

Ukraine, Russia and the Kremlin-backed separatists signed the cease-fire deal in the Belarusian capita, Minsk, on Friday in an effort to end more than four months of bloodshed. The negotiators also agreed on the withdrawal of all heavy weaponry, the release of all prisoners and the delivery of humanitarian aid to devastated cities in eastern Ukraine. Western leaders voiced skepticism over Russia's commitment to the deal. A previous 10-day cease-fire, which each side repeatedly accused the other of violating, yielded few results at the negotiating table.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko's office on Saturday said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin had discussed steps "for giving the cease-fire a stable character" in a telephone conversation.

But, it said, both leaders assessed the cease-fire as having been "fulfilled as a whole."

Fighting between pro-Russian rebels and Ukrainian government troops has ravaged the already teetering Ukrainian economy, claimed at least 2,600 civilian lives and left hundreds of thousands homeless, according to United Nations estimates.
 
WORLD UKRAINE

Ukraine Government Repels Rebel Attack on Airport
Associated Press 9/13/2014 5:28 PM ET

LUHANSK, Ukraine — A convoy of more than 200 white trucks crossed the Russian border to deliver humanitarian aid to a battered Ukrainian city on Saturday, a move made without Kiev’s consent yet met with silence by Ukraine’s top leaders.

“Early in the morning, we entered Ukraine to bring aid to Luhansk,” said Yury Stepanov, a Russian who was overseeing the convoy. “We came in around 215 vehicles,” he added, as workers unloaded boxes into a local warehouse.

The much-needed aid arrived as fighting flared again between pro-Russian rebels and government forces, further imperiling an already fragile cease-fire in the region.

On Saturday, Ukraine’s military operation in the east said it had repelled a rebel attack on the government-held airport of Donetsk, which came under artillery fire from rebel positions late on Friday. Ukrainian authorities also admitted for the first time since the cease-fire started last week that they have inflicted casualties on the rebel side.

Continuous rocket fire could be heard overnight in Donetsk. A statement on the city council website said that shells hit residential buildings near the airport, although no casualties were reported. A column of three Grad rocket launchers — all its rockets still in place — was seen moving freely through the rebel-held city on Saturday morning.

In the other regional capital of Luhansk, one of the worst-hit cities where tens of thousands have been without water, electricity, or phone connections for weeks, the streets were calm as Russian drivers unloaded aid packages into local warehouses.

Stepanov said the goods consisted mainly of foodstuffs — rice, sugar, and canned fish and beef — but also included medicine, technical equipment and clothes. The deliveries were in closed boxes, small enough to be easily carried by one person, but rice was seen spilling from a broken bag.

Inside the warehouse, an Associated Press journalist saw water bottles carrying the logo of Russia’s LDPR party, led by virulent nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

While dozens of local workers unloaded boxes, several carloads of armed militiamen in camouflage arrived to inspect the scene.

Stepanov said his team was responsible only for delivery, and distribution will be handled by local authorities — which for now means the separatist leaders of the self-proclaimed Luhansk People’s Republic.

Gennady Tsepkalo, a senior separatist official, said retirees, hospital patients and schoolchildren would be priorities for aid. He said the food would not be used to feed rebel fighters.

“The militia will feed itself separately. This is for the residents of the Luhansk People’s Republic,” Tsepkalo said.

Luhansk shows deep scars of an unsuccessful, weeks-long shelling campaign by government troops. The government had regained growing swathes of territory from the separatists over several weeks, but a major rebel counteroffensive beginning in late August halted and reversed that trend.

Luhansk itself was at one point almost totally surrounded by government troops. Those forces have since abandoned many of their former positions.

As the Russian trucks drove back along the border toward Ukraine, rebel fighters along the road punched the air and waved in greeting.

At the border point of Izvarine, a line of cars that stretched for several kilometers was filled with refugees who had fled to Russia but briefly returned during the cease-fire to grab all the household items they could.

An August agreement between Russia, Ukraine, and the international Red Cross allowed Moscow to bring aid to the region, as long as all vehicles were inspected by Ukrainian border guards and escorted by the ICRC. After two weeks of waiting at the border for all sides to agree, Russia sent the cargo across the border without Kiev’s consent.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s observer mission to the Russian-Ukrainian border said Saturday that ed220 trucks cross into Ukraine, none of which were inspected by the Ukrainian side or accompanied by the ICRC.

“We were not officially notified of an agreement between Moscow and Kiev to ship the cargo,” Galina Balzamova, a representative of the ICRC’s Moscow office, said Saturday.

The Russian emergency ministry, which coordinated previous humanitarian aid deliveries to Ukraine, could not be reached for comment.

Col. Andriy Lysenko, spokesman for Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, told journalists Saturday that Russia’s move into Ukrainian territory was “illegal.”

But the silence of Ukraine’s top leaders marked a dramatic shift in Kiev. In August, when Russia sent a convoy of trucks over the border without waiting for Kiev’s approval or oversight from the ICRC, Ukrainian officials quickly condemned what they called an invasion of Ukraine. On Saturday, no top Ukrainian leader mentioned Russia’s latest delivery at all.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has been at pains to prove that the cease-fire has yielded improvements on the ground in east Ukraine. On Friday, he lauded the agreement, which has been riddled by violations since it was imposed last week, as a “fragile but efficient peace process.” Allowing more humanitarian aid into the region was one component of the 12-point deal.
 
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29300213

Thousands of people have marched in Moscow to protest against Russia's involvement in the Ukraine conflict.

People carrying Russian and Ukrainian flags chanted "No to war!" and "Stop lying!" Similar rallies took place in St Petersburg and other Russian cities.

Ukraine accuses Russia of arming rebels in the east and sending Russian troops across the border. Moscow denies this.

More than 3,000 people have died in fighting since April.

A truce was agreed on 5 September but there have been repeated violations since then.

The fighting began after Russia annexed Ukraine's southern Crimea peninsula in March - a move condemned by Ukraine and the West.

Moscow police said about 5,000 protesters took part in Sunday's demonstration but a reporter for the AP news agency estimated that the crowd was at least 20,000-strong.

The organizers said the numbers were far higher for a march they described as a protest against Russia's "aggressive foreign policy".
Supporters of separatists in Ukraine held their own smaller rally in Moscow, where they ripped a Ukrainian flag.

The demonstrators marched from Pushkin Square to Sakharov Avenue in central Moscow.

Police stepped up security in the capital and there were only minor scuffles reported between rival demonstrators.

It is Russia's first major anti-war rally since the fighting began five months ago in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions.

A number of supporters of the pro-Russia separatists in Ukraine held their own rally in Moscow.


Social media reaction to Moscow's anti-war rally:

Vladimir Varfolomeyev, a journalist from Russia's Ekho Moskvy radio station, on the anti-war march turnout: "50,000, in my view, is a conservative estimate. Most likely it was slightly bigger."

Oleg Kashin, a correspondent with Kommersant newspaper, said: "The party of peace ended up on top today. And the party of war lost. And that's fantastic."

Kristina Potupchik, a pro-Kremlin blogger, wrote: "The organisers preferred to forget the fact that there is currently a ceasefire in Ukraine, which was achieved partly due to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin personally."

"Look at this coven of orcs with flags of Nato and [Ukrainian nationalist group] Right Sector in Moscow. Does Russia need all this pestilence?" former professional boxer Nikolay Valuyev tweeted.
 

vodkazvictim

Why save the world, when you can rule it?
The Russkis are merely defending their own territory. Whether it's their territory now, or soon will be.
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
Well said, VV! Do you guys know that the planeyards and the whole bureau complex where Antonov created not only he largest airplane in the world (Which is essential for the russian space program), but the workhorses that are the backbone of the russian system, in regards of air traffic etc.

If Florida would segregate from the USA, like Texas loves to threaten, would the US governemnt say, okay, we give up that state. Hell, no.

The Ukraine will eventually become russian again. It is only a matter of time.
 
Well said, VV! Do you guys know that the planeyards and the whole bureau complex where Antonov created not only he largest airplane in the world (Which is essential for the russian space program), but the workhorses that are the backbone of the russian system, in regards of air traffic etc.

If Florida would segregate from the USA, like Texas loves to threaten, would the US governemnt say, okay, we give up that state. Hell, no.

The Ukraine will eventually become russian again. It is only a matter of time.

Antonov is in a bad situation. Ilyushin and Tupolev are two of the most experienced makers of large military aircraft in the world. Plus the Russian have Beriev, which has an designed that uses technology from the Caspian Sea Monster. The Be-2500 would dwarf the An-225.

http://www.beriev.com/eng/Be-2500_e/Be-2500_e.html
 
Putin taking advantage of the US I'm right political fight.

Russia to Fly Bombers to U.S. Gulf as Ukraine Escalates

Bloomberg By Volodymyr Verbyany and Kateryna Choursina
10 hours ago

Russia plans to extend long-range bomber patrols as far as the Gulf of Mexico and the eastern Pacific Ocean, its defense minister said, as NATO accused Vladimir Putin's government of sending more troops into Ukraine.

With Ukraine warning its conflict is close to returning to open war, Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said his country's military will start conducting regular long-range bomber patrols along Russia's borders and over the Arctic Ocean. His ministry rejected an assertion from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's top general that it was moving combat troops and heavy weapons into Ukraine's rebel-held east.

"In this situation, we have to maintain a military presence in the western part of the Atlantic and the eastern part of the Arctic Ocean, in the Caribbean and in the Gulf of Mexico," Shoigu said, according to a statement on the Russian Defense Ministry website.

Pressure has been growing between Russia and the U.S. and the European Union as Ukraine and pro-Russian rebels in its eastern regions accuse each other of gearing up for a renewed military push that risks adding to the death toll of more than 4,000. The UN Security Council is scheduled to hold an emergency session in New York today over the conflict.

Tank Columns
Friction over the region's fate is driving a wedge between Russia and its former Cold War foes in their worst geo-political standoff since the fall of the Iron Curtain. Ukraine says President Vladimir Putin is stoking the unrest to create a potential frozen conflict that will thwart the former Soviet republic's efforts to deepen ties with the EU. Putin denies his country is involved militarily.

"We have seen columns of Russian equipment, primarily Russian tanks, Russian artillery, Russian air-defense systems and Russian combat troops entering into Ukraine," U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove, NATO's top military commander, told reporters in Bulgaria today. "We do not have a good picture at this time of how many. We agree that there are multiple columns that we have seen."

The separatists and their Russian backers are amassing troops in the areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions they've seized, Ukrainian Defense Minister Stepan Poltorak told a government meeting in Kiev earlier today.

The yield on Ukraine's dollar-denominated note maturing July 2017 jumped 154 basis points to 17.67 percent by 7:14 p.m. in Kiev, bringing the eight-day increase to 4.28 percentage points. The hryvnia, which is down 18 percent this month in the world's largest decline, was unchanged at 15.85 per dollar.

"Investors are voting with their feet -- they now expect further Russian military intervention, and expect the West to do nothing to help Ukraine," Timothy Ash, London-based chief economist for emerging markets at Standard Bank (STAN) Group Ltd., said by e-mail today. Bondholders are increasingly concerned a war could lead to the "collapse of a state" that would "not be able to pay" its debts, he said.

Russia's ruble, which has fared worse than any other currency during the past three months, was 1 percent stronger at 46.2208 per dollar at 5:36 p.m. in Moscow.

International Law
There's no evidence confirming Russia has sent troops into Ukraine, news service RIA Novosti cited Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov as saying. The ministry no longer pays attention to Breedlove's comments, Konashenkov said.

If Russia did move in troops "it would be another example of Russia's blatant disregard for international law," Pentagon spokesman Steve Warren told reporters today in Washington.

"We've seen the Russians operating in and around Ukraine for months,"he said. "We've called regularly on Russians to contribute to stability, not continuing to contribute to instability."

Warren announced today that next month an Air Force F-16 unit will be training with the Estonia Air Force in an exercise that practices close air support tactics.

‘Anti-Russian Sentiment'
The situation on Russia's southwestern border is "difficult," Shoigu said. "This is connected to the situation in Ukraine, with the emerging anti-Russian sentiment on the part of NATO and the increase of foreign military presence in the immediate vicinity of our borders."

NATO and Ukraine said Russian troops were involved in heavy fighting that preceded a Sept. 5 truce signed in Minsk, Belarus. At the time, Ukraine said Russia was conducting a "full-scale" invasion that resupplied rebel forces and aided an assault that halted a government push to retake territory.

President Petro Poroshenko then called for a cease-fire after Ukrainian television images showed Russian tanks advancing toward the Sea of Azov port of Mariupol and fighting raged in its outskirts.

The UN Security Council will hold an emergency meeting at 2:30 p.m. today in New York, Australian representative Gary Quinlan said on his Twitter account.

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told reporters that Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe observers reported pro-Russian separatists were preparing for a major military confrontation.

"That's in no one's interest. We're losing time," he said in a news conference alongside Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto in Berlin today. "We've reached a point where we cannot say how this conflict will continue to develop."

EU foreign ministers will discuss "restrictive measures" against Russia when they meet next week, Maja Kocijancic, spokeswoman for EU foreign-affairs chief Federica Mogherini, said yesterday.

Further economic penalties aren't planned, with the bloc considering targeting people associated with "illegal" elections in rebel-held areas of Ukraine on Nov. 2, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said.
 
It does make you think, if nobody else in the world actually believes Russia when it says it's not directly and actively involved in Eastern Ukraine, just whom are they really lying to? The only real answer is there own people.
 
Top