Tulsi Gabbard, First Hindu Elected To Congress, Will Swear In On Bhagavad Gita, Sacred Hindu Text

Mayhem

Banned
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...t-hindu-congress-bhagavad-gita_n_2159249.html

When Tulsi Gabbard, a Hawaii resident who made history this month as the first Hindu elected to Congress, attends her swearing in ceremony in January, she's poised to mark another first in American politics: Gabbard will take her oath over the Bhagavad Gita, a sacred Hindu text.

While no religious ceremony is legally required for those elected to Congress and the Senate, many choose to take oaths of office over Christian and Jewish texts, and Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, a Muslim, took his oath over a Quran. But Gabbard's use of a non-Abrahamic text will be unique and is symbolic of the growing religious diversity of Congress.

“For the Hindu Americans it is a historic moment ... It is a matter of pride that finally someone not only from our own faith, but someone who is a practicing Hindu, will be sworn in the Congress on one of our most sacred books," said Anju Bhargava, founder of Hindu American Seva Charities and a former member of the White House's Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

"It is my hope is that this swearing in will be another learning opportunity for our country about Hindus and Gita. Another step towards bringing the knowledge and values of Gita even more prominently to the American political landscape so that it becomes part of the everyday vocabulary in applying the moral principles in our political arena," said Bhargava, whose organization works to promote Hindu participation in civic life.

The Bhagavad Gita, which is often referred to as the Gita, is one of several Hindu texts, but Gabbard has said it's her primary sacred text. It is comprised of 700 verses and 18 chapters of the famed Mahabharata epic and is told in the form of a dialogue between Arjuna, a warrior-prince, and Krishna (God), in which they discuss his role and philosophical concepts in the Sanatana Dharma (Universal Order), which is popularly known as Hinduism.

In interviews, Gabbard has pointed to two verses of the Gita as being particularly important to her. Both are from chapter two, which is called "Sankhya yoga," and which discusses the soul. The chapter is often seen as a summary of the Gita's spiritual instruction. Gabbard's first favorite part, from verse 17, defines the soul as "that which pervades the entire body you should know to be indestructible. No one is able to destroy that imperishable soul." The other, from verse 23, expands on the idea: "The soul can never be cut into pieces by any weapon, nor can he be burned by fire, nor moistened by water, nor withered by the wind."

Although there are other older Hindu scriptures, such as the Vedas, the Gita is seen as representing "essence of all Vedas," said Siva Subramanian, a Washington, D.C.-area resident and member of the Council on Hindu Temples of the USA.

"It is also important for the USA that it will eventually have the representation from all the religions, and Tulsi taking the oath on the Gita is another step in that direction," Subramanian said.

Gabbard, 31, was born in American Samoa and raised by a Catholic father and a Hindu mother. She moved to Hawaii when she was two years old and joined the Hawaii state legislature in 2002 at age 21. She served in the Hawaii National Guard the next year and, in 2004, went to Baghdad to be a medical operations specialist. In 2008, she was deployed to Kuwait to work with the nation's counterterrorism trainees.

Gabbard chose to embrace the Hindu faith after her mother started practicing it when Gabbard was a teen. The congresswoman-elect, whose first name refers to a tree that's sacred to Hindus, follows the Vaishnava branch of Hinduism, which focuses on the Supreme Lord Vishnu and his 10 main incarnations.

Largely made up of Indian-Americans, the Hindu population in the United States is between 600,000 and 2.3 million. Unlike most Hindus, Gabbard is not of Indian heritage. Her father is Samoan and her mother is a convert to Hinduism.

Gabbard could not be reached for comment by The Huffington Post prior to publication, but in a statement released after her victory, she expressed hope that her election would help encourage other Hindu-Americans to proudly embrace their religion.

"On my last trip to the mainland, I met a man who told me that his teenage daughter felt embarrassed about her faith, but after meeting me, she's no longer feeling that way," said Gabbard, who will represent Hawaii's 2nd Congressional District. "He was so happy that my being elected to Congress would give hope to hundreds and thousands of young Hindus in America, that they can be open about their faith."

Gabbard will be taking the House seat of Hawaii's Mazie Hirono, a Buddhist who beat former Gov. Linda Lingle (R) in the Senate race, making Hirono the first Buddhist in the U.S. Senate. When Hirono was sworn into office in January 2007, she did not take an oath, but made an affirmation. The option comes from Article 6 of the Constitution, which says that "Senators and Representatives ... shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required."

The affirmation option "was a religious liberty measure that was provided to Quakers and Mennonites, who were the two main religious minorities at the time of the Constitution's writing. They did not take oaths out of religious convictions," said Eric Rassbach, deputy general counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a legal advocacy group.

Hirono and Gabbard will join a mostly Christian but increasingly diverse Congress. A recent Pew Forum analysis showed that the 530 seats in the 113th Congress will include 299 Protestants, 161 Catholics, 32 Jews and 15 Mormons, among other faiths.

The first Muslim to join the House or Senate, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), was first elected in 2006 and reelected for a fourth term on Nov. 6. In 2008, Rep. Andre Carson (D-Ind.) became the second Muslim elected to Congress. In 2008, Rep. Hark Johnson (D-Ga.), another Buddhist, also joined Congress, making him and Hirono the first Buddhists to be elected to Congress. The only atheist in the current Congress, Rep. Pete Stark ( D-Calif.), lost his seat on Nov. 6. But Democrat Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, who has said she prefers a "secular approach," will join the new Congress. Another Hindu, Ami Bera, was also elected this year to represent California's 7th Congressional District. Bera's win a tight race against Republican incumbent Dan Lungren was not called until Nov. 15, which makes him the second Hindu elected to Congress.

More than a century and a half ago, smaller religious groups made headway into congressional seats for the first time. Lewis Charles Levin of the American Party was the first Jew elected to Congress in 1845, and represented Pennsylvania in the House. The first Mormon was John Milton Bernhisel, who joined Congress in 1851 to represent Utah. The only Sikh congressman, California Democrat Dalip Singh Saund, was elected to three terms beginning in 1957.
 
FFirst Hindu, first openly gay, first openly bi-sexual... Seems like America really moving forward :thumbsup:
 
This is wonderful. Frankly, it is surprising to me that it is allowable to use a non-Christian sacred text. Americans come in all colours and religions, and this is a marvelous example of representation of the people. If the voters decided she was the best option to lead, and did not hold her religious views against her, this will be a very appropriate ceremony.

Now, let the resident bigots come and spew their vitriol.
 
Whats next? A member of the Muslim Brotherhood? Fuck all of you Progressives.
 

StanScratch

My Penis Is Dancing!
A correction: if I am mistaken, no member of Congress is actually sworn in by any text (bible, Bhagavad Gita, Koran, etc.), but sworn in en masse. Pictures of them being "sworn in" with their hands on their respective texts are basically photo ops. Please correct me if I am wrong.

But, I say this in complete honesty: Should I ever become an elected official who is sworn to oath (or a witness in a court case, I guess), I would be torn between swearing on Cosmos or A Brief History of Time.

Meanwhile, it is very nice to see the American a diverse people. Great for Gabbard, great for those of us who realize this country is a true melting pot of ideologies. Oh, and to make some idiot's head explode: http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/ellison.asp
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
How unAmerican. :facepalm:

Wait...

She is called, Hindu-American. Why not, Samoan-American?

She was born in Leloaloa, American Samoa, an unincorporated territory of America.

Since she was not born in America, she shouldn't be able to hold a political office.
 

Rattrap

Doesn't feed trolls and would appreciate it if you
This is wonderful. Frankly, it is surprising to me that it is allowable to use a non-Christian sacred text. Americans come in all colours and religions, and this is a marvelous example of representation of the people. If the voters decided she was the best option to lead, and did not hold her religious views against her, this will be a very appropriate ceremony.
:clap:

Now, let the resident bigots come and spew their vitriol.
Don't have to wait long...
Whats next? A member of the Muslim Brotherhood? Fuck all of you Progressives.
:1orglaugh You know Sam, this will be the one and only time I address you, seeing as 100% of the time - and I mean that, 100% - I click to view one of your ignored posts, I see nothing of any value. So I just want to say: the world will be a better place when you're dead. Only something like 1/7,000,000,000 better, as there are a lot of people to average out the curve, but it will be better nonetheless. I'd say maybe you'll realize this at some point and change your ways, but you won't - sometime you'll just be dead and the world will just be slightly better for it.

Such a shame.

Anyway - I applaud the development. Now if we can get elected officials to stop swearing by religious texts altogether (I'll settle for mostly, even), we'll really be getting somewhere
 
Anyway - I applaud the development. Now if we can get elected officials to stop swearing by religious texts altogether (I'll settle for mostly, even), we'll really be getting somewhere

An interesting thought, but do you not think that if an elected official has religion, and holds something sacred, is it not appropriate that they swear to do their duty by that sacred belief? To what higher standard can they be held?
 

Rattrap

Doesn't feed trolls and would appreciate it if you
An interesting thought, but do you not think that if an elected official has religion, and holds something sacred, is it not appropriate that they swear to do their duty by that sacred belief? To what higher standard can they be held?
Oh, sure - I mean to say, I think it'll be better once most don't have a religion to swear on. After all (to, admittedly, take an extreme - though perhaps not as much as we'd like - example), how much good legislating is one going to do if, say, one believes that the apocalypse needs to hurry up and come so they can be whisked off to heaven (keeping in mind that said legislator can potentially take actions to bring said apocalypse closer to reality)?

Holy texts have historically not been good sources for ethics or morals.
 
Oh, sure - I mean to say, I think it'll be better once most don't have a religion to swear on. After all (to, admittedly, take an extreme - though perhaps not as much as we'd like - example), how much good legislating is one going to do if, say, one believes that the apocalypse needs to hurry up and come so they can be whisked off to heaven (keeping in mind that said legislator can potentially take actions to bring said apocalypse closer to reality)?

Holy texts have historically not been good sources for ethics or morals.

Fair points. I'm all for religion, however. And, though I never thought I'd say it, I point to Vice President Biden as a good example of this. During the debate, he made the statement that he was against abortion because he is a Roman Catholic. He said that he also believed that his religious beliefs, while deeply felt, should not dictate policy for a pluralistic nation. Leadership like that will lead us into the future - have deeply felt beliefs, fight for them, respect the beliefs of others. It is possible for all those things to exist in a good politician.
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
How unAmerican. :facepalm:

Wait...

She is called, Hindu-American. Why not, Samoan-American?

She was born in Leloaloa, American Samoa, an unincorporated territory of America.

Since she was not born in America, she shouldn't be able to hold a political office.

Are you saying that is is illegal to hold a public office in the US because you weren't born here?
 

Mayhem

Banned
Are you saying that is is illegal to hold a public office in the US because you weren't born here?

No, he's saying that he thinks it should be illegal. A very important distinction that must always be applied to my increasingly unhinged friend.
 
How unamerican. :facepalm:

[...]

She was born in Leloaloa, American Samoa, an unincorporated territory of America.

Since she was not born in America, she shouldn't be able to hold a political office.
She's a veteran, she fought for her country. In Iraq.
How could someone be more worthy to hold political office ?

Whats next? A member of the Muslim Brotherhood?
If he's a veteran, why not ?

Meet Veteran, Representative-elect Tulsi Gabbard

After the events of Sept. 11, then-Hawaiian state representative Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii saw the world around her change. And so she enlisted in the Hawaii Army National Guard.

"I felt that I need to do more with my life, to be of service to Hawaii's citizens and our country in a greater way," said Gabbard.

As a veteran who has gone through two combat tours in the Middle East, Gabbard says she truly understands the cost of war. She knows what it means to be away from home and loved ones, and to re-adapt to civilian life after service.

"This firsthand understanding is extremely important and relevant now with the challenges and debates facing Congress regarding the military, the budget, foreign policy and caring for our troops, veterans and military families," said Gabbard.

During her service in Iraq from 2004 to 2005, Gabbard was responsible for maintaining a list of injured Hawaiian soldiers. She says the experience instilled in her a desire to get troops home from Afghanistan as quickly and safely as possible.

Gabbard says she will work to improve efficiency within the Veterans Administration as well as work to reach out to individual communities to ensure that all veterans have access to service they need.

Gabbard, along with Tammy Duckworth, is one of the first female combat veterans to ever serve in Congress. And Gabbard says she and Duckworth are in a unique position to understand veteran issues, both foreign and domestic.

"Women war veterans know very well the high cost of war, not just on lives and limbs, but on the cohesion of our families, the hardships on our children, spouses, and of course the economic costs and so much more," said Gabbard.
 

Rattrap

Doesn't feed trolls and would appreciate it if you
He said that he also believed that his religious beliefs, while deeply felt, should not dictate policy for a pluralistic nation. Leadership like that will lead us into the future - have deeply felt beliefs, fight for them, respect the beliefs of others. It is possible for all those things to exist in a good politician.
Very much agreed! Alas, like finding a perfectly benign dictator, how often do you think you'll find this quality in a politician (or people, for that matter, considering they vote in who they vote in)? The country is rife with people trying to legislate their religious beliefs onto others as 'live and let live' seems to be not enough; politicians are, of course, simply extensions of the people.

But this is going to quickly slide into the broader discussion, so I'll simply once again state that I agree, and amend my earlier statement: I'd be happy with mostly nonreligious politicians, or mostly politicians who understand their religion is their religion and, like Biden's statement, don't try to legislate their religion onto others.
 

Mayhem

Banned
It should be the law, if you weren't born in America then you don't hold any political office in America.

Anchor babies need not apply.

Well it's not the law, she was born in an American territory and she served in the US military. You argument and your indignation are made of tissue paper.

BTW Will, which branch of the military did you serve in?
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Well it's not the law, she was born in an American territory and she served in the US military. You argument and your indignation are made of tissue paper.

BTW Will, which branch of the military did you serve in?

An unincorporated territory. Which is not America.

I don't care if she served in the military.
If America was different, I might have served.

I was born here and have relatives that predate the Constitution and the forming of this country. I belong here more than most do.
 

Mayhem

Banned
No Will, if you were different; much, much different, You Might have served. And You Might care about those who did your work for you. She has earned her right to hold public office by serving her country and by being democratically elected by a majority of voters. That's America. Deal with it.
 
Top