And if you disagree, fuck you you're wrong.
I wish someone would explain to me why we bothered to waterboard Islamist when they probably have zero tolerance to chemical interrogation. Waterboard them with some Jack Daniels....you'll have the info your looking for, pronto. Slip them my old friend, THC and they'll not only sing, they'll probably defect.
Does it work? Yes and we should keep doing it against any Islamist we capture who may have info we need. I'm sure we're still doing it against high value targets.
Does it work? Yes and we should keep doing it against any Islamist we capture who may have info we need. I'm sure we're still doing it against high value targets.
Waterboarding didn't phase them. Understand they prepared for far worse, they were trained to withstand way harsher treatment by authoritarian governments like Egypt. Case in point, KSM was waterboarded 183 times. If waterrboarding works why did you have to do it 183 times lol
Can we use torture on Christians that we capture, and think have some info we need, too?
I don't see any Christian "Jihadists" that have been captured. So far they all belong to to the Islamic faith.
I don't see any Christian "Jihadists" that have been captured. So far they all belong to to the Islamic faith.
Also, no Christian suicide bombers.
I don't see any Christian "Jihadists" that have been captured. So far they all belong to to the Islamic faith.
Allah promises 72 virgins to those who martyr themselves. If Jesus promised a Lexus, condo in Miami and an untraceable account in the Caymans, there'd be pasty-white suicide bombers running around everywhere.
You're forgetting that Breivik fucker in Norway and the people who bomb abortion clinics. I doubt those crazies are as organized as Al Qaeda, but they are still terrorists. As mentioned above, if it worked, why was it done 183 times? It'd be a lot easier to put them on an IV bag of vodka to get them talking. More to the point, why stoop to their level? It's much more fun blowing them up while they're getting goat pussy.