The SCOTUS Kavanaugh hearing

[sean miguel]

Well then maybe we live in the twilight zone now.
A big phony fake show. Divide and conquer, a distraction.
Do you actually think these politicians are against each other? Enemies? on different sides?
They are not.

You are just another person who believes all the lies you are told.
You believe it and because you do, you are putty in their hands.
You believe in something that just isn't real. Maybe you are living in the Twilight Zone.

And the reason I post less now is because it is depressing to me to see how thought manipulated pretty much all of you here now are.
They got you so tricked, so deceived, your heads so far up your asses that you can't smell the poop anymore.
To me its sad because a population so brainwashed is only heading one direction.

we're hopelessly deceived. You've done your due diligence. move on.

 

[pool_hustler]

Gee whiz Underbro, why you got to be so uppity?
Conservatives done enslaved, raped, beaten, lynched, disenfranchised and discriminated against black folks since the beginning of this nation.
White bigots is almost all conservatives and almost all members of the Republican party.
So why can't you trust and embrace conservatism?
Guess you must just want free stuff. Yeah, that must be it.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Gee whiz Underbro, why you got to be so uppity?
Conservatives done enslaved, raped, beaten, lynched, disenfranchised and discriminated against black folks since the beginning of this nation.
White bigots is almost all conservatives and almost all members of the Republican party.
So why can't you trust and embrace conservatism?
Guess you must just want free stuff. Yeah, that must be it.

Make that Democrats, snowflake.
The same ones that remained in the Democrat party after the Civil Rights Act.

All but one.

 

[georges]

Gee whiz Underbro, why you got to be so uppity?
Conservatives done enslaved, raped, beaten, lynched, disenfranchised and discriminated against black folks since the beginning of this nation.
White bigots is almost all conservatives and almost all members of the Republican party.
So why can't you trust and embrace conservatism?
Guess you must just want free stuff. Yeah, that must be it.

Lying is not good, so let me remind you about Democrats and their links to slavery.Who killed Lincoln? A democrap. Who was the founder of the dixiecraps? Again a democrap. But as usual what I could expect from democraps, aside twisting the facts and having a selective memory nothing else but certainly not saying the truth.
https://www.nytimes.com/1864/02/20/archives/slavery-and-the-democratic-party.html

https://www.dailywire.com/news/3005...rats-being-party-slavery-amanda-prestigiacomo
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...d-for-racist-policies-for-more-than-100-years
https://www.nationalreview.com/2017...th-amnesia-democratic-party-oppresses-blacks/

 

[Johan]

- - - Updated - - -

I Wrote Some of the Stolen Memos That Brett Kavanaugh Lied to the Senate About

He should be impeached, not elevated.


[...]

For example, in 2004, Sen. Orrin Hatch asked him directly if he received “any documents that appeared to you to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.” Kavanaugh responded, unequivocally, “No.”
In 2006, Sen. Ted Kennedy asked him if he had any regrets about how he treated documents he had received from Miranda that he later learned were stolen. Kavanaugh rejected the premise of the question, restating that he never even saw one of those documents.

Back then the senators did not have the emails that they have now, showing that Miranda sent Kavanaugh numerous documents containing what was plainly research by Democrats. Some of those emails went so far as to warn Kavanaugh not to distribute the Democratic talking points he was being given. If these were documents shared from the Democratic side of the aisle as part of normal business, as Kavanaugh claimed to have believed in his most recent testimony, why would they be labeled “not [for] distribution”? And why would we share our precise strategy to fight controversial Republican nominations with the Republicans we were fighting?

Another email chain included the subject line “spying.” It’s hard to imagine a more definitive clue than that.
Another said “Senator Leahy’s staff has distributed a confidential letter to Dem Counsel” and then described for Kavanaugh that precise confidential information we had gathered about a nominee Kavanaugh was boosting. Again, it is illogical to think that we would have just given Miranda this “confidential” information for him to use against us. But this is precisely what Judge Kavanaugh suggested in his testimony on Wednesday. He is not that naïve.

[...]

But, surely, reasonable questions about what he had been party to would have been considered after the story of the theft exploded in the news, Miranda was forced to resign, and the U.S. Senate sergeant-at-arms began a bipartisan investigation into the files stolen from the Senate?

As of November 2003, when the sergeant-at-arms seized the Judiciary Committee’s servers, Kavanaugh would have been on notice that any of the letters, talking points, or research described as being from Democrats that were provided to him by Miranda were suspect and probably stolen from the Senate’s server.
But he did nothing. He did not come forward to the Senate to provide information about the confidential documents Miranda had given him, which were clearly from the Democrats.

Kavanaugh also apparently did nothing when the Senate referred the case to the U.S. attorney’s office for criminal prosecution. (Miranda was never prosecuted.)

Eventually, though, Kavanaugh went even further to help cover up the details of the theft.
During the hearings on his nomination to the D.C. Circuit a few months after the Miranda news broke, Kavanaugh actively hid his own involvement, lying to the Senate Judiciary Committee by stating unequivocally that he not only knew nothing of the episode, but also never even received any stolen material.

Even if Kavanaugh could claim that he didn’t have any hint at the time he received the emails that these documents were of suspect provenance—which I personally find implausible—there is no reasonable way for him to assert honestly that he had no idea what they were after the revelation of the theft. Any reasonable person would have realized they had been stolen, and certainly someone as smart as Kavanaugh would have too.

But he lied.
Under oath.

[...]

His actions were dishonorable and dishonest.

This week, as part of his efforts to be elevated to the highest court in the land, he has calmly continued to deceive, falsely claiming that it would have been perfectly normal for him to receive secret Democratic letters, talking points, and other materials. And if this absurd notion were somehow true, it would not even be consistent with what he testified to 12 and 14 years ago.

Back then, he didn’t state it would have been normal for him to receive secret Democratic strategy materials.
Instead, he explicitly and repeatedly went out of his way to say he never had access to any such materials. These objectively false statements were offered under oath to convince the committee of something that was untrue. It was clearly intentional, with Kavanaugh going so far as to correct Sen. Kennedy when the senator described the document situation accurately.

That’s why—without even getting into other reasonable objections to his nomination—he should not be confirmed.
In fact, by his own standard, he should clearly be impeached.

Now, I don't think Kavanaugh should be impeached for that. Bill Clinton wasn't (not to mention that spying on political opponents is far more serious than just fucking an intern in the Oval Office or having an affair while married).
But since Republicans thought lying under oath was something that should get a president impeached, I don't understand why they would just give Kavanaugh a pass and elevate him.
I guess this is an example of the legendary GOP's consistency...

 

[Straight Shooter]

 

[pool_hustler]

Well BC you can't possibly be this ignorant, so I'll chalk it up to shame combined with a desperate need to deflect.

The glaringly obvious point, which anyone who 1) hasn't had a lobotomy or 2) isn't in complete denial about, is that all of those democrats were rabid CONSERVATIVES, and there isn't a damn thing you can say or do to change that historical fact, no matter what absurd lengths you or any other conservative apologists go to.

Hey Georges, 3 simple history questions:
1) What kind of social philosophy has the KKK and its membership always embraced?
Liberal or conservative?
2) How about the Confederate States of America? What social and political philosophies did they embody?
Liberal or conservative?
3) Were the southern legislators who created and enforced Jim Crow and other discriminatory laws liberals, or conservatives?

Once you've answered those question maybe you'll figure out that your laughable little "inconvenient truth" video actually does nothing but highlight the truly ugly heritage of conservatism in America.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Well BC you can't possibly be this ignorant, so I'll chalk it up to shame combined with a desperate need to deflect.

The glaringly obvious point, which anyone who 1) hasn't had a lobotomy or 2) isn't in complete denial about, is that all of those democrats were rabid CONSERVATIVES, and there isn't a damn thing you can say or do to change that historical fact, no matter what absurd lengths you or any other conservative apologists go to.

Hey Georges, 3 simple history questions:
1) What kind of social philosophy has the KKK and its membership always embraced?
Liberal or conservative?
2) How about the Confederate States of America? What social and political philosophies did they embody?
Liberal or conservative?
3) Were the southern legislators who created and enforced Jim Crow and other discriminatory laws liberals, or conservatives?

Once you've answered those question maybe you'll figure out that your laughable little "inconvenient truth" video actually does nothing but highlight the truly ugly heritage of conservatism in America.

Yet only one of the racist Democrats switched to the GOP.
You can’t dance around that fact nor can you dance around LBJ proclaiming “ well have those ni****s voting Democrat for the next 200 years”.

And then there’s this.

https://pjmedia.com/michaelwalsh/2013/3/29/history-lesson/

You’re a Democrat, I’d be ashamed too

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

This whole Kavanaugh debacle just goes to show you that we don't know people as good as we think we do. ..

So you're saying...the FBI that we thought was the most sophisticated and talented intelligence agency on the planet, is basically filled with incompetents and morons? I guess after doing SIX background checks on Kavanaugh and letting him slip through to the nuclear codes, yep, they must be complete buffoons.

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

I was really unaware of how the Robert Bork thing was done by liberals.


Really, It is now clear to me that liberals are the most cutthroat, vile political bastards there are in America today. It's literally Saul Alinsky tactics all over the place on the left, and it's been going on for some time now.

 

[georges]

Well BC you can't possibly be this ignorant, so I'll chalk it up to shame combined with a desperate need to deflect.

The glaringly obvious point, which anyone who 1) hasn't had a lobotomy or 2) isn't in complete denial about, is that all of those democrats were rabid CONSERVATIVES, and there isn't a damn thing you can say or do to change that historical fact, no matter what absurd lengths you or any other conservative apologists go to.

Hey Georges, 3 simple history questions:
1) What kind of social philosophy has the KKK and its membership always embraced?
Liberal or conservative?
2) How about the Confederate States of America? What social and political philosophies did they embody?
Liberal or conservative?
3) Were the southern legislators who created and enforced Jim Crow and other discriminatory laws liberals, or conservatives?

Once you've answered those question maybe you'll figure out that your laughable little "inconvenient truth" video actually does nothing but highlight the truly ugly heritage of conservatism in America.

Truth is too hurtful, ain't it ? A democrat is a democrat and conservative is a conservative, people don't switch brutally from one side to another all of sudden. Because socialism has done marvels??? Just see in Venezuela or in Nicaragua. What's so ugly in conservatism? The fact that you protect your traditions as well as your custom and habits fom unwanted and radial tendancies, from uncontrolled illegal alien immigration,the fact that you respect the flag, back up your troops and respect the 2nd amendment. Conservatism is always better than socialism, if you are so unsatisified of living in the USA then why don't you go living to Venezuela, Nicaragua or North Korea??? You will find the joys of leftism/socialism that you love so much but then don't complain living i nextreme misery and poverty.

 

[Straight Shooter]

Uh oh

WATCH: Kavanaugh Accuser Julie Swetnick Backtracks on Some Claims in Extensive NBC News Interview
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-k...-some-claims-in-extensive-nbc-news-interview/

Police report 'reveals SCOTUS nominee Kavanaugh was questioned in 1985 by cops at Yale about a bloody bar fight after a night out at a UB40 concert'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...gh-questioned-police-1985-Yale-bar-fight.html

 

[meesterperfect]

Just can't wait until this ends and they can give us another mass killing. Probably planning a big one next.

 

[Supafly]

A guy that squeals and moans like a bitch can't be on the SCOTUS

And he lied about various issues, among them his heavy drinking, which is a key issue in the rape allegations.

 

[georges]

A guy that squeals and moans like a bitch can't be on the SCOTUS

And he lied about various issues, among them his heavy drinking, which is a key issue in the rape allegations.

You are so damn predictable but I knew it especially with a video from an Obama muppet channel. The ones who are bitching at his nomination and obstructing against it are the democraps and he has more than enough experience to be a scotus, he has 12 years of experience on the second highest court, the district circuit court with an impeccable record. Not sure you have the same record, he also has the highest award from the American Bar Association. The democraps as vile and as disgraceful as they are used slander, smearing, a full amount of false accusations in order to ruin his professional life and personnal life. They also bribed witnesses to lie under oath against Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh set the record straight during the hearing.Let's list the facts as they are

Third accuser names four people she went to alleged 'gang bang" parties yet none corroborates her story either
http://www.dailycaller.com/2018/10/01/swetnick-accuser-corroborate/

Three witnesses interviewed by FBI in Kavanaugh probe don't remember the party in Ford’s testimony
http://www.dailycaller.com/2018/10/02/kavanaugh-fbi-investigation-witnesses/

Julie Swetnick: ‘I cannot specifically say that [Kavanaugh] was one of the ones who assaulted me’
https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/01/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push

FBI widens investigation with examination of 2nd Kavanaugh accuser
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/f...&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2018-10-01

Classmate comes forward, IDs frat Brother as guilty party, not Kavanaugh: Report
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/c...&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2018-10-01

Lieing under oath has very serious consequences and same for derailing a supreme court nomination and fucking democraps loved to played stupid games, so they will pay a huge stupid prize. Not everyone is a fool and a leftist/liberal sympathizer not to see what's happening. And remember that saying well :"What comes around, goes around"

 

[Supafly]

The channel does not matter. That is first.

Second: He lied about "never having been so drunk he didn't afterwards remember"

His former buddies stated that is a blatant lie.

And his laughable attempt at proving his actions from the past by showing a goddamn calendar. Are you serious?

 

[georges]

The channel does not matter. That is first.

Second: He lied about "never having been so drunk he didn't afterwards remember"

His former buddies stated that is a blatant lie.

And his laughable attempt at proving his actions from the past by showing a goddamn calendar. Are you serious?

As opposed to you I watched all the four vids of his hearing on cspan during las tweek end and none recalled of him being an alcoholic. What is more laughable and absolutely despicable is the attempt of the democraps obstructing him in order to get the seat vacant at all costs with manipulated and bribed witnesses having made false testimonies under oath. Yes, I am very serious and I always am unlike you. When none corroborates of the facts of any of the alleged so called three victims but when 65 women and many more childhood friends give a written testimony of good faith and honesty sworn under oath that Kavanaugh is an exemplary and top notch guy, who is more believable and credible? Kavanaugh, end of discussion. This nomination hearing was sabotaged by democraps as a political coup kinda like at the time of judge Thomas but typically predictable and expectable from the democraps and their shitty hypocritical double standards

 

[~~whimsy~~]

Just can't wait until this ends and they can give us another mass killing. Probably planning a big one next.

Since you are the pinnacle of knowing what will happen when, where, what time, and who will be the victims? Also provide the script, layout and blueprints.

When this happens I will provide you the phone numbers to corroborate your statement here about who and who is not dead.

Since you didn't call Galveston Coroner I expect the same reply from you of deflecting an answer and providing a real substantial evidence of your claims.

Hashtag full of shit

 

[Supafly]

Ach, Georges.

As a judge, and a candidate for the most prestigous seat your country has to offer, he must know that he has to face total scrutiny, before getting a lifelong seat.

He keeps digging himself a hole with false statements and hissdy fits.

And the FBI could solve this all, but they are kept from taking action

Extremely fishy

 

[Supafly]

His own letter from 1983 his own handwriting to his drinking buddies - belie his words about his behaviour today.