The Incredible Hulk
- Thread starter milano193
- Start date
the first one didnt exactly appeal to a wide audience.... too much time was spent on the development of the character.... way less than spidey.. who just jumped around from building to building... spraying his shit web around... and that was IT? the rest was all GOOD vs EVIL..
the hulk is a bit more complex character....
having said that... i also said that a sequel to the first one would gross a lot more money... cuz the "development" phase is over.... its all SMASH/BASH time.. which is what what 90% the ppl go to see
the hulk is a bit more complex character....
having said that... i also said that a sequel to the first one would gross a lot more money... cuz the "development" phase is over.... its all SMASH/BASH time.. which is what what 90% the ppl go to see
Iamforever
Banned
you cant forget howard the duck. :1orglaugh
why would eddie put his name on this dung pile?:dunno: such a waste of talent.
:rofl:
om3ga
It's good to be the king...
And let us nnot forget Doctor Strange or Justice League of America - now those flicks definitely stunk.......
The old Spiderman movies from a long time ago were terrible to.
The old live action TV series!?!? Oh yeah they stunk something fierce! LMAO
Special effects were slightly worse in those days. :1orglaugh
Greatest American Hero was better! :rofl:
om3ga
It's good to be the king...
Yeah they were far from "special" LOL:1orglaugh
i think it will be good. edward norton is very good. i loved louis leterrier's directing on the transporter movies. and according to most articles, they intend to go for a straight comic book adaptation. i feel ang lee's use of "oriental storytelling" was a poor choice for such a western story. (i have the utmost respect for his work and it was a brave, if strange, experiment. he should have tried it on a non-blockbuster movie).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Incredible_Hulk_(film)
zak penn writing looks wack, though
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0672015/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Incredible_Hulk_(film)
zak penn writing looks wack, though
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0672015/
as far as the original(and i know it wasn't the original, but as far as recent times) is concerned, it was horrible. and that was with eric bana, whom i think was perfect for the role.
while norton is a phenomenal actor, i don't know how he'll play as the hulk. it'll all boil down to the screenplay and the director. the character already has expectation to be met.
while norton is a phenomenal actor, i don't know how he'll play as the hulk. it'll all boil down to the screenplay and the director. the character already has expectation to be met.
If he spends more time going "HULK SMASH!" And there's far less time spent on "puny Banner" then the movie might be good.
They also need to get Peter David to write the screen play I say.
They also need to get Peter David to write the screen play I say.
The problem was Ang Lee, who wanted to make an Oscar worthy movie! His styling of the movie to make it look like a live comic book and long ass storyline was what killed it. Seeing Hulk smashing those tanks and helicopter was awesome and its sad but punny Banner has to be part of the storyline. Hopefully critics are not going to scare the companies from producing another Hulk, by the way Spawn is not that bad.
BNF
Ex-SuperMod
No doubt. 6'5" and c275lbs.... no animation, no computers, no f/x.
Norton has always been a weasel in my book. I don't understand who's casting this guy. :crash:
Last edited:
