That's around 8kbs more than I get most of the time. It's shameful that the US, the richest, most powerful, "supposedly" the most technologically advanced country in the history of the Earth is behind tens of others with the way it transfers data. It's not just a little behind either. At the rate we are going in another decade we are still going to be well behind were a lot of people are now. It's not going to get much better in the immediate future. It's a good thing we didn't have the mindset we do now when electricity, telephone service, and roads were being put in for everybody a long time ago. Even places that have very high population density here and what we consider fast broadband have it more expensive and slower than a great many places around the world. That's the free market and capitalism for you. Isn't it great how it works out to make everything better...oh wait. There are places around the world that are more sparsely populated that have better data infrastructure, like Sweden, so that's also not a legitimate excuse either.
Before people bring up cellular or satellite systems, they're all pretty terrible, and are not a reasonable option unless somebody has a ton of cash and they don't mind blowing it. They cost very significantly more for very significantly slower speeds, are usually much slower than even their listed speeds, are very unreliable and the system goes out a lot more, have high latency, have extra expensive equipment that has to be bought, and most of them have very low download limits and FAPs.
Whatever you do don't get satellite Internet. I have heard nothing but one horror story after another about it. Your pretty much actually better with staying with dial-up, as sad as that is.