The anti-pornography side on the other side of the debate is kicking our teeth in and we are just letting them do it! Back in the 1980's there was Andrea Dworkin and Catherine MacKinnon, who were making every effort to outright ban pornography. Even if it meant siding with the Christian ultra-right. Nowadays we have folks like Robert Jensen, Judith Reisman, Rianne Eisler and Toni Van Pelt who are making every concentrated effort to outright ban pornography in the marketplace because it does not match up to their prudish ideas of human sexuality. They seem to think a man puts his dick in a woman's vagina and out comes wonderful flowers. Well, that ain't how sex is supposed to be. Sex is supposed to be nasty, raw, unpredictable, filthy, dirty and passionate. These sex puritans want a sex-free existence and make false and erroneous assumptions that porn leads to **** and the "objectification" of women, even though they have yet to define what objectification actually means.
I thought I could let it slide but the anti-porn ****** are back in full *****. Today, I was at the local library and there was a suggested reading list about human trafficking. "Human trafficking" of course we all want to stop this evil but it started to be more than just stopping the exploitation of ******** and women. It was getting to the root of the evil and that evil was banning pornography. Of course, it was an extremely biased list of books: The Johns: Sex for Sale and the Men who Buy It by Victor Malarek; Prostitution and trafficking in Nevada: Making the connections by Melissa Farley, Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy by Kevin Bales and Rod Soodalter, amongst other titles.
But Defending Pornography by Nadine Strossen, Porn 101, XXX: A Women's Right to Pornography by Wendy McElroy, Pornography, Sex and Feminism by Alan Soble, and Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting ******** from Sex by Judith Levine weren't mentioned or brought up for discussion. I have no doubt that human trafficking does occur in America but to make the giant leap and put pornography in the same net with human trafficking is laughably absurd, stupid and illogically ridiculous. They are using "human trafficking" as a shield, using it as a political weapon so they can try and get pornography ****** outright.
Why isn't the pro-pornography side standing up and fighting back?
I thought I could let it slide but the anti-porn ****** are back in full *****. Today, I was at the local library and there was a suggested reading list about human trafficking. "Human trafficking" of course we all want to stop this evil but it started to be more than just stopping the exploitation of ******** and women. It was getting to the root of the evil and that evil was banning pornography. Of course, it was an extremely biased list of books: The Johns: Sex for Sale and the Men who Buy It by Victor Malarek; Prostitution and trafficking in Nevada: Making the connections by Melissa Farley, Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy by Kevin Bales and Rod Soodalter, amongst other titles.
But Defending Pornography by Nadine Strossen, Porn 101, XXX: A Women's Right to Pornography by Wendy McElroy, Pornography, Sex and Feminism by Alan Soble, and Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting ******** from Sex by Judith Levine weren't mentioned or brought up for discussion. I have no doubt that human trafficking does occur in America but to make the giant leap and put pornography in the same net with human trafficking is laughably absurd, stupid and illogically ridiculous. They are using "human trafficking" as a shield, using it as a political weapon so they can try and get pornography ****** outright.
Why isn't the pro-pornography side standing up and fighting back?
