Rhian Sugden Unbeatable?

[alwayson]

Yeah, I definitely neg repped you for that. If you think she looks like a man, you need your fucking head examined, douche.

I am not the first on this board to suggest Gisele looks mannish

 

[Hot Mega]

Yes I read your posts but that doesn't mean that it naturally follows that I must understand what you have posted. Do you understand every post you read in this board?

True.

I must admit that sounds great but sadly I'm sure it will not work. Humans are not too good at "legitimately making comparisons and explaining objective reasoning for preferences". If we were we wouldn't need moderators to keep order. The Miss FO contest was a perfect example. There was no criteria and fights were breaking out all over the place. Your wonderful criteria would have encouraged more fighting. :2 cents:

Well I can't go by nor consider what some will do in failing to analyze a comparison. You asked me why and I told you (reasonably I thought) what my perspective on it was. And Miss FOs is not a good example it was purely and simply a popularity contest among it's OCSMs. The one who got the most votes presumed to be the most popular among voters. Nothing more, nothing less.

That's different from asking who has the best feminine looking hourglass body for example.:2 cents:

To make you realize that your criteria is not needed. That's it.

You should have picked a different thread or subject to demonstrate that point. However, my criteria probably wouldn't be at issue in some of the other threads.

The above post is also a perfect example of why several board members have described you as condescending. I have never expressed an interest in dicks or assholes. FACT

You are very condescending and there is no need for it. :2 cents:

You are absolutely correct. I can be very condescending but despite what you or others may believe, I'm not that way naturally. I usually respond pretty belligerently to what I consider blatant intellectual dishonesty in a discussion. When people ignore facts or simple realities or when they are otherwise unnecessarily rude or derisive. So, I disagree..sometimes there is a need for it.

Having people question your opinions is all a natural part of the board experience and this thread is nothing compared to the disagreements you have on an almost daily basis in the racial and political threads.

Questioning an opinion or conclusion in a societal, political or otherwise discussion is one thing. Deriding someone for their personal tastes or likes in a model is another.

You're right criteria does matter sometimes. All we're saying is we don't need your personal criteria to decide who we do or do not like. That's it.

Never said you did nor have I seriously argued someone's opinion.

I have a personal preference for asking questions over using the search function. I'm also sure you ask way more questions in this board than I do. Check the political threads. You ask a lot of questions. This is a talk board where we give opinions and ask questions. I don't see a problem as that is what we are here to do. :2 cents:

I have a personal preference in asking you to research the threads I have posted in to have a clearer understanding of my personal favorites. Maybe I might have been more forthcoming had you not gone through the trouble of researching my posts for things completely irrelevant in the first place. Surely if you have the "energy" to research my posting antics, style or habits in racial, political, social, etc. threads you should have the will to do so for info which actually interests you (theoretically):2 cents:

With respect to my questions in the political threads....the vast majority of my questions are rhetorical as I already know the answer or reasonable response. I am merely asking a question whereupon honestly answered demonstrates the fault in the opposing view.:2 cents:

I respect your right to have as many likes and dislikes and preferences as you want so long as you also respect our right not to use your criteria if we do not wish to. You can provide as much detail as you like. It makes no difference to me but I also wanted you to provide the name of your favorite if you have one. It's not difficult to type 2 or 3 extra words as part of your reply, is it? I know you like to provide lots of detail in your replies that's why I made it very clear I have no problem with you adding as much details as you like.

It depends on if there is a criteria set or not. Surely it's not reasonable to add your input in a who has the best looking shaved pussy with some bush babe just 'cause you think bushes are hotter. That would be one example.

For the record I agree that Got Gisele is very hot indeed but there are many other models/pornstars who I think are hotter and I am more than happy to name them if anyone is interested. I think we're clear now. :thumbsup:

:dunno:Isn't there a thread for that?

I am not the first on this board to suggest Gisele looks mannish

I wouldn't have neg repped you nor called you a douche but the head examination part should be strongly considered by you.:2 cents:

 

[alwayson]

funny arguments on this thread

 

[britush]

http://www.mnscash.com/tools/rs/rs001eam/index.php/39810837,2258,2,24267,

 

[richardbs]

Rhian Sugden in red leather catsuit for babespotting..

 

[fgsefgs]

Unbeatable, eh?

[size=+3]Challenge Accepted[/size]

P.S. this thread is in the wrong place and should at least be moved or instead closed as it has turned into a bashing (pun intended(trollface.jpeg)) thread for this Rhian girl and Got Gisele.

Tis a troll thread...