How should the photographer handle the model's vulva?
Yes it depends on what he wants to say.
We've come a long way since the sex-organs were air-brushed out in the name of "art" and nowadays "almost" anything goes. That doesn't mean that bald and bold is better. A totally twatless model though is a disppointment.
I do a "Can I do you now Sir?" post most days. I'm looking for an explicit offer of sex/ request for sex. Sometimes I get it right - sometimes less-so.
I've started a new thread about the beautiful girl "just being beautiful". The diference of emphasis is obvious:
A grinning girl isn't feeling randy, however much anatomy she's pointing at the camera...
An innocent nubile girl isn't simply feeling horny if she's emphasizing her twat at the expense of facial expression and eye-contact etc. For me the erotic image has the camera rather than the model emphasising her cunt ...
Perhaps it's all a matter of balance? Or maybe it's just taste?
What would you ask a photographer of the solo model to seek more/less of and when and why?
Yes it depends on what he wants to say.
We've come a long way since the sex-organs were air-brushed out in the name of "art" and nowadays "almost" anything goes. That doesn't mean that bald and bold is better. A totally twatless model though is a disppointment.
I do a "Can I do you now Sir?" post most days. I'm looking for an explicit offer of sex/ request for sex. Sometimes I get it right - sometimes less-so.
I've started a new thread about the beautiful girl "just being beautiful". The diference of emphasis is obvious:
A grinning girl isn't feeling randy, however much anatomy she's pointing at the camera...
An innocent nubile girl isn't simply feeling horny if she's emphasizing her twat at the expense of facial expression and eye-contact etc. For me the erotic image has the camera rather than the model emphasising her cunt ...
Perhaps it's all a matter of balance? Or maybe it's just taste?
What would you ask a photographer of the solo model to seek more/less of and when and why?