President Trump's first year better than Reagan's

[sean miguel]

News Flash to Conservatives in the Republican Party – According to the Heritage Foundation President Trump did an amazing job in his first year in office – even better than conservative and American icon President Ronald Reagan!
The New York Times reported that the conservative Heritage Foundation ranks President Trump as doing even better than conservative icon President Ronald Reagan in the first year of his Presidency –

The Trump administration has pursued policies that have hewed remarkably close to the recommendations of a leading conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation, which found in a new review that nearly two-thirds of its ideas had been carried out or embraced by the White House over the past year.

Not one to dwell on the details of governing, President Trump has shown a considerable degree of deference to groups within the conservative movement like Heritage, leading to a rightward shift in social, environmental, immigration and foreign policy.

The results, Heritage found in its review, exceeded even the first year of Ronald Reagan’s presidency, whose tenure has long been the conservative gold standard.”

The Times continued that as the horrible Obama years came to an end –

Heritage began developing in 2016 a list of 334 policy prescriptions that a new Republican administration could adopt. It included a variety of actions, like reimposing work requirements for welfare recipients, ending the program that shields young immigrants brought here illegally as children, withdrawing from the Paris climate accord and eliminating certain gender identity protections.

Heritage said that 64 percent of those items were enacted by the administration either through executive order or another means of enforcement, or included in Mr. Trump’s budget, which has not been voted on by Congress.

In Reagan’s first year, only 49 percent of Heritage’s wish list items were embraced by the president or enacted. At the time, Heritage identified a familiar problem for why the administration’s policies were wanting. In almost every federal agency, Heritage said in November 1981, “delayed appointments, unqualified or misqualified appointments, or the appointment of individuals who are not committed to the President’s goals and policies” had delayed or thwarted policy changes.”

President Trump incurred his fair share of challenges during his first year but his results were historic –

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ation-rates-trumps-first-year-better-reagans/

 

[Supafly]

I bet he will be happy to read that in prison.

 

[mongo18]

According to the Heritage Foundation President Trump did an amazing job in his first year in office...has pursued policies that have hewed remarkably close to the recommendations of a leading conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation

Not one to dwell on the details of governing, President Trump has shown a considerable degree of deference to groups within the conservative movement like Heritage

Translation: he doesn't know shit about his job, but he does what we want him to do, so he's doing a great job!

Just like you fox, you're doing a great job too. This is definitely a well sourced and legitimate report that proves drumpf is tremendous. You're so clever!

 

[Jack Davenport]

A little short but still positive economic news.
Trump’s first year matched Obama’s best year of GDP.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/gdp-q4-2017-first-reading.html

 

[Jack Davenport]

According to the Heritage Foundation President Trump did an amazing job in his first year in office...has pursued policies that have hewed remarkably close to the recommendations of a leading conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation

Not one to dwell on the details of governing, President Trump has shown a considerable degree of deference to groups within the conservative movement like Heritage

Translation: he doesn't know shit about his job, but he does what we want him to do, so he's doing a great job!

Just like you fox, you're doing a great job too. This is definitely a well sourced and legitimate report that proves drumpf is tremendous. You’re so clever!

Kinda like when Jeremiah Wright said “ you know the Jews won’t let him (Obama)talk to me anymore”
Implying that the left wing Reform Jews controlled his every move.
Yep, exactly like that.

You so clever! Stop stealing my lines.

Seek help.

 

[mongo18]

Kinda like when Jeremiah Wright said “ you know the Jews won’t let him (Obama)talk to me anymore”
Implying that the left wing Reform Jews controlled his every move.
Yep, exactly like that.

Actually, no, those 2 things are nothing alike.

You so clever! Stop stealing my lines.

Seek help.

So you say the same thing I did in the post after I said it and accuse me of stealing your lines? You're not your idiot leader, you can't just lie about what is right in front of everyone and hope to get away with it.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Actually, no, those 2 things are nothing alike.



So you say the same thing I did in the post after I said it and accuse me of stealing your lines? You're not your idiot leader, you can't just lie about what is right in front of everyone and hope to get away with it.

Clever/Witty Witty/Clever

Even worse it was addressed to you!
Stuff stealer. You and Ice should get together and have a baby or something.
https://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?939397-People-get-ready&p=10081531#post10081531

 

[mongo18]

Clever/Witty Witty/Clever

Even worse it was addressed to you!
Stuff stealer. You and Ice should get together and have a baby or something.
https://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?939397-People-get-ready&p=10081531#post10081531

Oh fuck! Nobody can use the word "witty" or any of its synonyms on this forum again! I sure hope nobody has used the words "stupid" or "ignorant," I'm saving them for a rainy day...

 

[Johan]

A little short but still positive economic news.
Trump’s first year matched Obama’s best year of GDP.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/gdp-q4-2017-first-reading.html

Glad to know you admit it's too early to say that Trump is doing better than Obama on the economy.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Oh fuck! Nobody can use the word "witty" or any of its synonyms on this forum again! I sure hope nobody has used the words "stupid" or "ignorant," I'm saving them for a rainy day...

You so dense!

- - - Updated - - -

Glad to know you admit it's too early to say that Trump is doing better than Obama on the economy.

lol wut?

 

[pool_hustler]

A little short but still positive economic news.

A LITTLE short? 2.3 is a number you pissed on when Obama produced it.

And well short of Trump's promises.

Trump’s first year matched Obama’s best year of GDP.

You sure about that? I'm pretty sure Obama had 3 annuals that eclipsed 2.3.

 

[Jack Davenport]

2.6 not 2.3 and it is in his FIRST year. The next 3 quarters will be in excess of 3.5.

Get your facts straight. The economy grew at 2.3. An increase over 1.5 of 2016. GDP grew at 2.6 matching Obama’s best year.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/26/gdp-q4-2017-first-reading.html

If you think that the Trump economy is going to be as anemic as Obama’s you are going to be quite depressed. I know you say you want it to flourish, but it is obvious you are lying. You want it to tank. What’s good for America is bad for liberals.

 

[pool_hustler]

2.6 not 2.3

1.2 + 3.1 + 3.3 + 2.6 = 10.2 divided by four which = 2.3

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...22769454f82_story.html?utm_term=.6e4ced1ce94b

The next 3 quarters will be in excess of 3.5

Hope so. Your prediction it would eclipse 3 this year didn't pan out.


If you think that the Trump economy is going to be as anemic as Obama’s you are going to be quite depressed.

No I won't be depressed. I'll likely be wealthier. But Trump's number is right in line with the average annual GDP since the great recession, and many very well respected economists think a number of around 3 will be our cap for some time ahead yet. Not because of politics, but because of market dynamics.

I know you say you want it to flourish, but it is obvious you are lying. You want it to tank. What’s good for America is bad for liberals.

Well lets see, you've called me pathetic and a liar tonight. Sounds like somebody's angry. Care to go for a trifecta? :1orglaugh

 

[Jack Davenport]

1.2 + 3.1 + 3.3 + 2.6 = 10.2 divided by four which = 2.3

https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...22769454f82_story.html?utm_term=.6e4ced1ce94b

The next 3 quarters will be in excess of 3.5

Hope so. Your prediction it would eclipse 3 this year didn't pan out.


If you think that the Trump economy is going to be as anemic as Obama’s you are going to be quite depressed.

No I won't be depressed. I'll likely be wealthier. But Trump's number is right in line with the average annual GDP since the great recession, and many very well respected economists think a number of around 3 will be our cap for some time ahead yet. Not because of politics, but because of market dynamics.

I know you say you want it to flourish, but it is obvious you are lying. You want it to tank. What’s good for America is bad for liberals.

Well lets see, you've called me pathetic and a liar tonight. Sounds like somebody's angry. Care to go for a trifecta? :1orglaugh

Actually 1.2 + 3.1 + 3.3 + 2.6 divided into quarters = 2.55

Trump also became president during an unusually slow first quarter and was almost one month into the quarter when he was inaugurated. Anyway, it is all his now and I expect 4 or 5 percent growth for this year.

 

[zeeblofowl_1969]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ation-rates-trumps-first-year-better-reagans/

Regans administration was an organized crime family pure and simple comparing trump to that shit is comical.

 

[zeeblofowl_1969]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ation-rates-trumps-first-year-better-reagans/

Regans administration was an organized crime family pure and simple comparing trump to that shit is comical.
Should of been call HW’s first 8 years he was in charge of that presidency from the very start.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Regans administration was an organized crime family pure and simple comparing trump to that shit is comical.
Should of been call HW’s first 8 years he was in charge of that presidency from the very start.

Link?

 

[pool_hustler]

Actually 1.2 + 3.1 + 3.3 + 2.6 divided into quarters = 2.55

You're right. Math never was my strong suit. So why are so many sources reporting it as 2.3?
https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...rowth-in-2017-to-2-3/articleshow/62664731.cms
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...22769454f82_story.html?utm_term=.a93a54e21162
https://www.inman.com/2018/01/26/2-3-gdp-growth-held-back-by-new-home-shortage-in-2017/

Whatever the case, it's still short of 3, and it's still a number you'd have shit on had it belonged to Obama, correct?

 

[Jack Davenport]

I certainly wouldn’t be criticizing Obama’s numbers after one year. I waited 2 years or more before I criticized him at all. It seems that increased imports drove down fourth quarter numbers. Economic growth was at 2.3. I think the people reporting are confusing economic growth with GDP.

 

[zeeblofowl_1969]

Link?

Life is not driven by links.
Some people were paying attention at the time and just know.
From selling WEAPONS TO IRAN!!!
Or selling cocaine to its own citizens that administration was a joke.
You can go ahead and count how many people connected with that group were actually convicted of crimes, not alleged, not fake news, but actually convicted.