[NEEDS ID] Please identify a 2002 KPC model

Help, it's been driving me crazy. I can't find the model (pics attached).

She had two sets over at Karup's PC which were deleted in the 2009 purge. Looking at the style and scan quality, she was photographed by Toby, JS Hicks, Creative Technologies or maybe XXPosed Studios, bo she has no picture sets on ATK (Archives or Galleria).

I've looked through most large sites that existed since 1990s or early 2000s, but found nothing on them. I had access to DD (Stephen Hicks's site) and she wasn't there.

420566267_edita001.jpg420566371_edita011.jpg420566871_edita043.jpg420567076_edita058.jpg420567531_edita002.jpg420567664_edita019.jpg420568113_edita048.jpg
 

The Identifier

Administrator
Staff member
Platinum Member
I think there must be a very good reason why you haven't found the answer after all these years.
https://www.freeones.com/forums/thr...-ungarova-schindlerova-bente-or-recna.775276/

I come across an obstacle at every turn which suggests to me that her content has been removed very deliberately, even on "unofficial" places - so they must have received an instruction to remove it too.

So you will likely have to accept that you won't find out whoever it was or more pics of her, and even if you did it would be against her will. Indeed, I would politely ask that you stop asking about it before such a legal request comes our way - particuarly as you have hosted these images on our servers.
 
I figured it's probably incomplete Title 18 USC 2257 paperwork because most content by the same photographer from the same period is still available, while other content isn't.

I don't think there's any question whether the model is an adult, but webmasters just played it very safe. I don't think Freeones is in real danger over this. I won't be making any further bumps, this is the last one.

For context, if anyone comes looking for this model, 2257 dates back to 1988 and websites were traditionally very lax about the paperwork. There were some raids on websites in the past and I think the big ones were given ultimatums to remove material with missing, incomplete or suspect paperwork.

And the regulators aren't even the only ones the webmasters listen to. I had a back and forth about missing sets on MET, and their support candidly responded that they were requested by CCbill to remove content that depicted young-looking models, even if they were adults at the time of shooting (one particular model was 21 years old, but her pictures were taken down).
 
Top