Party Hardcore wrist bands
- Thread starter chef3880
- Start date
Yellow means you are into ****.
Pink means puss only.
Black means you take your coffee that way.
I'm honestly not sure, but it makes sense that a bunch of *******, high and horny folk should have clearly defined rules for interaction. Lest someone take advantage of them whilst they might, in their oddened state of mind.. say they want anal.. only to **** up with a disheveled butthole despite their CLEAR intentions during sobriety that they do not wish such.
Pink means puss only.
Black means you take your coffee that way.
I'm honestly not sure, but it makes sense that a bunch of *******, high and horny folk should have clearly defined rules for interaction. Lest someone take advantage of them whilst they might, in their oddened state of mind.. say they want anal.. only to **** up with a disheveled butthole despite their CLEAR intentions during sobriety that they do not wish such.
You are better off asking this question here @chef3880 - https://www.freeones.com/forums/thr...s-who-have-sex-in-partyhardcore.768526/latest
It's where all the Party Hardcore fanatics hang out.
It's where all the Party Hardcore fanatics hang out.
Sorry to interrupt, I think you should make a section on ID babes for Party Hardcore girls ,Dancing Bear, It's very hard to find the thread if it's made separately.
There are individual threads for each one of those things are there not? That should suffice but people still choose to spread it out over multiple threads.
Supposing there was a designated section for Party Hardcore / Dancing Bear / whatever... folks would still create millions of threads on the subject, and they probably wouldn't always post it in the right place either - so I'm not sure what you're getting at unless you could explain further?
John_8581
FreeOnes Lifetime Member
Members here are allowed to talk about Party Hardcore scenes. Nowhere else that I know of allows this. FreeOnes just does. Members are allowed to talk about this because Digital Media Management, Tainster and SINX has removed the scenes from the main websites. Those sites being Party Hardcore, Swinging Pornstars, ***** Sex Orgy, and their ilk etc. The owners over there did it for a reason. That reason is that there are just too many scenes and the servers have become overloaded. So scenes get taken down. Technically, any scene that is off the current paysite(s) is/was/should be discussed as stolen content. Members here aren't asking for IDs. How can you get an ID on a "one and done"? Digital Media Management, Tainster and SINX is a private entity so the IAFD and DATA18 won't list any of the participants (male or female) in these scenes. Then most times, members here are asking for scenes. It borders on what is the intention of the member's MO (modus operandi) is as to what the request is. Discussion on removed scenes needs to be addressed as content that is still in the public domain but the creative rights are with Digital Media Management, Tainster and SINX. If it's off the sites, then address it as such. Stolen content. Posts should be scrutinized and if need be removed. The member(s) here sanctioned.
Last edited:
Do you comprehend what is being said here @Torre82? ...because I don't. It might be a good suggestion.... I just don't understand what it is!
And let's not mix in John's comments with my own. I don't know what he's on about either to be honest with you.
Let's say I want it look organized well.
I believe he is saying that,
since the websites have removed the content.. and especially since the participants are often a 'one and done', (civilians)
that discussion of identity of actual people, and esp in regards to people that have long since done their gig and IAFD doesnt list them as performers since they are 'civilians' on removed/expired/private content...
that we should take the side of the content creator and regard it as 'stolen content' and discussion thereof is akin to dicussing piracy. Whilst the content still resides in the public domain, it is not available at their site (depending on which scene/video we are reviewing) and even the discussion of it.. would be like speaking about certain websites.
Didnt we disallow max hardcore or one of those 'sexual assaulty' websites? gaggers? etc. (So is it still available? Yes. But. It is in good taste to not speak of it? I think.)
Accordingly, if I'm understanding the multiple points and tossing them together.. we are the sole entity that allows discourse on private citizens that earned a buck in a porno about amateurs.. and that THAT should be defined as 'stalker' activity. (Reasonable point.)
Furthermore the scenes being discussed are no longer available and everybody within those sections is discussing deleted material, ergo we should take the point of the content creator and disallow that as per the content creator's wishes to take their property off (reasonably off) the internet. Sure it is forever out there and ppl will discuss it, but to OP's point.. we should treat the discussion of that content the same as if I were to talk about 'House, M.D (2004) S03 REPACK 1080p BluRay x265 HEVC 10bit AAC' and that if Fox removed the content from the (legal) internet, then discussion of the show other than the story.. for example the whole thread is about identity and scenes.. and if IMDB didnt list those actors, it would be for an actual, legit reason? So IAFD doesnt list those people because they do not wish to be identified. ... right? And furthermore they dont list it because the content is no longer available for purchase?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think the grey line is that perhaps each person in the thread actually owns the content. In which case they could discuss it amongst other legal owners. But with it being discussion of private content that is no longer available.. and it contains private citizens where the discussion is about THEM and not their publicly available content (which doesnt exist because they arent actual pornstars)... then we are, allegedly, the only entity to do this and it should not be this way. We should disallow and punish those who wish to discuss actors who wish to remain anonymous. Both by virtue of the company's wishes and perhaps the performers.
I think. I think I just explained the same thing multiple ways. But that is what I got from it.
@The Identifier
Similar threads
- Question