Of stories, gonzo, Henry Ford, Springfield and UFOs.

This is such a ridiculously long post. Sorry about that… :oIt is about why I hate gonzo... I could have go on forever. Of course, all this is IMHO and out of frustration.

I am one of the last specimen of an endangered species : the guy that likes stories in porn, and consequently hates gonzo. I hate gonzo so much that it made me stop watching porn till I decided to look at my favorite pornstars of the 90s. That’s all I am looking at.

I hate gonzo for many reasons that turn around this: it killed what I liked in porn, the pornstars. I like these girls, I really do. They are wild, have personnality, character, guts, and are doing what most would not do. You can’t say that of gonzo, one very important thing is missing: personnality, character. That’s the difference between a real pornstar and a girl that does porn.

I like stories or set-ups because (even when they are bad) that’s when a girl can show us who she is, how sexy and exciting she can be when she is dressed and doing something not related to sex (working at the office, etc…). I like to see her in different style of clothes and set-ups, and to see her dressed before undressing or getting undressed, even if I saw her many times.

--- I have never seen anything more sexy than a completly dressed and 30-year old Nici Sterling in a leather outfit doing some trash talking with her British accent.--- :love-smi:

I like stories because they are set in different places, that means we see different forms of sex and ways to shoot it. You know : trains, planes and automobiles and boats, restaurants, barns, cinemas and European or North-American streets, fields, etc… And they are dressed different and look different but always like pornstars with the right hair style, attitude, etc… Shoots done on morning, daylight, evening, nights, inside in all kind of locations, with nice lighting and atmosphere, with different camera angles, etc…

Gonzo : all the girls are dressed the same way (undressed or wearing some fishnet that I hope they washed before giving it to the next one, or some thong or bikini). They all answer the same stupid questions with the same answers I couldn’t care less about. (Isabella Camille is the only one that said something interesting, the guy was so surprised that he stopped the interview and went straight on the sex scene). Everything is the same and will be the same. You don’t change a winning formula, don’t be different. They all do their back and forth catwalks in front of the camera spreading bums and showing pussy as if it was the Holy Grail (don’t we just learned that it is under the pyramid at the Louvres ?).

It is like going through endless pages of niche sites showing you the same thing the same way again and again

The effect of that repetition : sex scenes that are almost non sexual or at least non humanly sexual that creates a complete lack of empathy for the people involved in it. And porn keeps on going far, (too far for some) and will keep on going farther and very rapidly... because we don't give a shit. In the thread What turns you off, about everything was refering to gonzo habits.

You could shoot 10 % of a gonzo scene with a dildo and a Fleshlight !!!!

At Vivid you can buy a mould of Midori’s butt, of some guy’s cock, some pussies… now you’re up to 25 % of your shoot without one single human being in it.

---- BTW, what part of the body do we see the most in gonzo ?----

And all are shot the same way, doing the same sex, something that a few years ago would have been called fetishism or BDSM. (I don’t care about that but give me something else!)

Fetischism ? You don't believe me ? How many movies are titled : Ass (something), or Anal (Something) or Something Ass or Anal ? Is there gonzo without Anal destruction ?

Most scenes take place on the same f*** couch, in the same living room, shot the same way, edited the same way and lit with the same washed white lighting that you find in medical clinics and assembly lines. So you end up having a mass produced GUIDE TO BORING SEXUALITY with girls that are highly forgettable, replaceable and disposable.

It is Henry Ford assembly line applied to porn production.

All that because porn is paying the price of its huge growth. Specially with internet sites, they need so many scenes and girls, that they have to mass produce them and find a way and style to do it. They can’t afford pornstars and originality. It has to be fast but they have to make us believe that this uniformity is a sign of quality. No tolerance for bad porn…. BS, they have never done anything else than bad porn.

Gonzo assembly line no 1.

Canera 1 is behind a guy, at the height of his balls and cock. He is in front a conveyor. He just punched its card and took its place. A whistle blows (at least something is blowing…) and the conveyor starts. A girl is on the conveyor, on her four, and that stops when the girl is in front of the guy who starts fucking her mouth and makes her gag.

After a predetermined lapse of time, the conveyor starts again and Girl 1 goes away and is replaced by Girl 2, in the same position, for the same shot (the camera stops when the conveyor moves and starts when it stops; no cameraman is needed). Meanwhile, Girl 1, still on her 4, stops further on the line in front of camera 2 : some dildo in extreme close-up fucking her pussy.

Another whistle and comes in Girl 3. Girl 2 goes away to the dildo and Girl 1 is taking it up the ass by the guy of camera 3. This is the highest paid worker of the assembly line. But you get there only after 5 years and you have to work on Xmas and during the week-ends.

AND NOW THE MOST STUPID OF ALL STUPIDITIES

Then the conveyor turns so a camera can shoot the girl from the side. Now we see all of her because we could have forgotten how she looks like. There is a guy behind her that fingers her ass and spits in it. This conveyor position is only for the last spits and fingerings (still, it goes on for 2 minutes…). A mechanism links the arm of the guy to a camera, so when he starts moving it the camera moves closer.
.
The guy takes his fingers out of the girl's ass and then very slowly (so the camera can follow) and very carefully, as if that bombshell is so hot and ready to explode that nitroglycerine oozes out of her ass, he brings these fingers to the face of the girl. So, ladies and gentlemen, you know for sure: this is no trucage. She is truly going to taste her shit on his fingers.:thefinger What a filthy bitch ! The girl tries to look as if she has been waiting for this treat all her life, then she rapidly takes the fingers in her mouth and sucks them (it is the only time she can suck, the rest of the time she is gagging) and then she gives to the camera a look that means something like : Taste just like the brownies I used to eat in Springfield.

And it goes on and on till the Great Excavator finds its shrine : the Mighty Gaping A. Scenes of 25, 30 minutes of that crap with girls that take stuffs in their holes without any action or reaction, words, any spontaneity or desires, NOTHING. Just a bunch of UFOs (Unidentified Fucked Objects) ready to be forgotten and replaced by the next one on the conveyor. Stop asking yourself why do these girls change names and all use the same first names ? That’s the whole idea. THOU SHALL NOT REMEMBER THEM!.

That’s sex according to gonzo, cinema (porn is cinema to me) according to niche sites and gonzo.

They killed pornstars.
They killed imagination.
They killed spontaneity.
They killed cinema quality.
They killed fun and humour. (I used to laugh a lot in the 90s, I don’t remember one single smile watching gonzo).
They killed sensuality, if not sexuality (I mean between a real man and a real woman) Most of the time they don’t really touch each other, just the cock that gets in one of the holes, the guy standing close enough to push it all the way and far enough to make room for the camera so the in and out movement is well illustrated. Touching or caressing, (call it the way you like) has disappeared from human sex intercourses. And of course, talking to each other is very rare and usually has a directional purpose : Spread your bums, Taste your ass… And the girl rarely says a word after the intro interview.
They even killed the humans. Have you noticed that people have no shadow in gonzo?

The day you won’t have a shadow, that day my friend you’ll be dead… or it would be raining. Not much fun anyway. And just think, you could be dead and it is a rainy day.:eek:
 
--- I have never seen anything more sexy than a completly dressed and 30-year old Nici Sterling in a leather outfit doing some trash talking with her British accent.--- :love-smi:

Nici Norman as she was known before she went to the US and got married here in the UK. You do know that accent she puts on is fake? Yes she is British but she covers up her real accent to try to sound like most non Brits think we talk like. Here in Britain we have different accents to the areas we live in. In those areas the accent can really vary too. As some parts it is thicker than others. Take Yorkshire for example. A person from Barnsley has a really thick Yorkshire accent and a person from Rotherham has a lot thinner accent.

I remember her first ventures into porn though. She first did a couple of films with David Sullivan's company producing. Then a gangbang and that is when she left for the US with new implants put in. As her early Brit stuff was before them mostly.
 
Thanks Poggy.
I know for the accent. I lived 3 years in London when I was young (decades ago) The 1st guy I talked to had a real Cokney accent. I thought he was Polish tryng to speak English. :o
I saw clips of Nici with her ordinary accent but that faked Brit one still remains more sexy to me (like faked Monty Python's Brit accent is more funny :))

But whatever accent, Nici was the best. I never thought of looking for her under her other name. Maybe I'll find that older stuff.

Thanks again.
 
Man this thread goes on and on and on, Ok I get it you hate gonzo. Good points, I do miss the corny ass (no pun intended) stories. I remember a aline from a 90's that I happen to be watching the other night(Yeah I watch porn at night) in which I think it was Heather Grant tells a dude, 'Hey did you noticed there's a girl giving you a blow job from under the table?" I just lost it there :rofl:

Quoting your article"

"At Vivid you can buy a mould of Midori’s butt, of some guy’s cock, some pussies… now you’re up to 25 % of your shoot without one single human being in it."


Wow I been duped by a fake ass of Midori?? What is this porn industry coming down to?:eek:
 
S

sputnikgirl

Guest
Well, I don't think it's going to get better until more baby boomers are spending their retirement checks. People my age and younger, who didn't even start watching porn until mid-late '90s don't know anything different. I can't even watch porn from the '80s...it's an entirely different aesthetic experience that I can't get into.

I understand what you mean about the formulaic experience, the same settings, etc. and I feel the same way. But if people keep buying it, then people will keep making it in the gonzo fashion.

But on the other hand, there are a lot of people who aren't watching porn to see intimacy. If I want intimacy, I seek out my real-life partner. I don't rely on porn to show me two human beings in an intimate situation. That's why I don't mind gonzo style, even though it can get repetitive.
 
Thanks Poggy.
I know for the accent. I lived 3 years in London when I was young (decades ago) The 1st guy I talked to had a real Cokney accent. I thought he was Polish tryng to speak English. :o
I saw clips of Nici with her ordinary accent but that faked Brit one still remains more sexy to me (like faked Monty Python's Brit accent is more funny :))

But whatever accent, Nici was the best. I never thought of looking for her under her other name. Maybe I'll find that older stuff.

Thanks again.

I don't think you'll find much on her early work even using her maiden name of Nici Norman. As I think I've said on here before. David Sullivan who she was contracted too in her early career doesn't release much. He prefers you to pay for it. The copyright is strict. Just some of the things he owns is the Sunday and Daily Sport newspapers, Titbits, Men Only, Parade and so on. Finding anything at all from these publications is near impossible on the web. About the only place you usually find anything from these is on such as Yahoo groups. But they are soon closed down as they get threatened with legal action.


Just shows how old I am really. After all I bought the first ever copy of Sunday Sport when I was 16, that was 21 years ago. To say it is a newspaper is really a insult. It's more a cross between the National Enquirer and a softcore magazine. All boobs and unbelievable stories. But you soon grow out of it :thumbsup:
 
Just shows how old I am really. After all I bought the first ever copy of Sunday Sport when I was 16, that was 21 years ago. To say it is a newspaper is really a insult. It's more a cross between the National Enquirer and a softcore magazine. All boobs and unbelievable stories. But you soon grow out of it :thumbsup:

How old you are :1orglaugh I was in London at the time of the Sex Pistols and the Punk years. The Roxy was at 1 minute walk from where I was living. Johnny Rotten threw its beer in my face because I was recording the show with a cheap tape recorder. The highlight of my years in London. And I was about 22 at the time, so I won't add the numbers. I found a few things about Nici and magazines (that you probably know already) but didn't find your post. I still gather infos and will put them in her longer thread.:wave:
 
I agree that a lot of it has become too cookie cutter like. I don't think porn should ever be more about the story than the sex because that's not what it's supposed about and it would never work out well, but I prefer seeing some simple story concepts in it. Not anything too overboard mind you, just some small and quick things to set the scene, and like you said to show a little bit of the actresses personality. I would take it little bit of originality and a slight amount of story than countless circus acts that gonzo has gone to far with for years now and scenes that are pretty much the same except for maybe an even crazier circus act that is preformed in them form time to time.
 
I agree that a lot of it has become too cookie cutter like. I don't think porn should ever be more about the story than the sex because that's not what it's supposed about and it would never work out well, but I prefer seeing some simple story concepts in it. Not anything too overboard mind you, just some small and quick things to set the scene, and like you said to show a little bit of the actresses personality.

That's what I think also. The first time I saw gonzo I thought it was merely a technical thing. Just a new lens or way to put the camera and show us a new type of framing to sex scenes. Just a new form...

but it is more a content than a form and that's when I just get bored. Once in a while, sure, but not all the time.

Italian and some European porn producers put gonzo shots in their sex scenes but Italian have too complicated stories.

I like the little intro (specially if there is some comedy in them) so we see the girl dressed and walking and she can show us some aspects of her personnality, and then right to the sex scenes shot in different places, in different ways including some gonzo shots. And this way we wouldn't know what will happen (maybe it will be just a BJ) and ... please... stop these scenes of 30 minutes long.

I still believe though that it is all a question of money. Gonzo is cheap to shoot.
 

DrMotorcity

Don Trump calls me Pornography Man
This is such a ridiculously long post.

Gee, I didn't think that those kind of posts were permitted here at FreeOnes.

:o:o:rolleyes:

Regardless, a great and extrordinarily passionate one, bunker.

Very inciteful and mind stimulating.

I quid you not.

:)
 
Well, I don't think it's going to get better until more baby boomers are spending their retirement checks. People my age and younger, who didn't even start watching porn until mid-late '90s don't know anything different. I can't even watch porn from the '80s...it's an entirely different aesthetic experience that I can't get into.

I understand what you mean about the formulaic experience, the same settings, etc. and I feel the same way. But if people keep buying it, then people will keep making it in the gonzo fashion.

But on the other hand, there are a lot of people who aren't watching porn to see intimacy. If I want intimacy, I seek out my real-life partner. I don't rely on porn to show me two human beings in an intimate situation. That's why I don't mind gonzo style, even though it can get repetitive.


Well... I can't really argue with you simply because I agree with what you wrote but for a miinor detail (and I am not even sure).

First, sure most young people would not be able to look at 80s porn, and I can't either. I don't think many people would like that. Different aesthetics, including the look of the women. The very bushy pussies (that were nornal in real life when I was young) now turn me off in porn. And lots of other things of the 80s porn would turn us off.

Second, if people buy it they'll keep producing it, that's for sure specially that it is so cheap to produce.

Third, I was not really talking about real intimacy but porn intimacy... real intimacy would turn me off. Once I saw a German scene with a couple doing it on a couch with some claissical music in background. It was hard sex but they were telling how they love each other about every 30 secondes. That was really weird and a real turn off. I want them to touch, caress, kiss, have fun but the porn way.

I could discuss this point : Age may have something to do with what we like or don't like, but we all started to watch porn at about the same time. Our experience is the same. Porn was not easily avbailable before end of 80s. I had my first VHS mid 80s and it took a while before porn industry exploded and it is at the beginning of the 90s that porn was all over vidéo clubs and even more now on internet.
Age may have an importance but according to at what age we started to watch porn and how often. We all started at almost the same date but one could be 15 years old and another one 50 years old. And now a 20 years old guy may have seen more porn than a 50 years old one, so they won't look at it the same way and won't look for the same thing.
All that is good, is it just a different experience.
 
Good post, bunker...I too miss the stories of a good porn movie...You know what else I miss?..the sexy outfits and even just the variety of clothes a woman can be wearing in good porn...What happened to the enticement?..it's like all the gonzo porn of today is designed for a guy to drop his pants, jerk off and cum as fast as possible...but they don't realize that for some, they're making it an assembly line, like you said...Personally, I can get off to gonzo and SOMETIMES it can even be done in a way I like...I just wish that porn would find a happy medium.:rolleyes:
 
My opinion on this is half the glamour side has gone out of it. A scene in a film is now often started where a woman is mostly undressed. She is only wearing a plain set of underwear or just a top and skirt, etc and is nude underneath. Then man walks in naked or with very little clothes on takes it out and off they go. The reality of it all has just gone out of it. If you could call a bit of talking and foreplay, removing actual clothes reality. With a actual plot running through the film. Most people like a bit of fantasy, even in their porn.

The outfits seem to be going down hill too. Even in such glamour porn legends such as Dorcel and Private. It just seems to be wear little as possible, get the woman naked as fast as possible and wham bam thank you mam. Everything seems to have a rush about it now. Some companies just seem to be seeing just how extreme they can go too. The companies need to remember not everyone likes the same thing. You need to have selection to cater for all. Otherwise people grow tired of seeing the same thing and will soon start to turn off and not purchase.

I mean hands up who gets up every morning and does the same thing day in day out. That been the exact same thing all day. You even grow tired of your favourites every once in a while and like to have a bit of a change (no this actually doesn't apply to me with Lucy, but doesn't mean I still don't look around at others every so often). Everyone likes a change every once in a while.

But at the moment it just seems to be same old, same old. I've noticed a few of the new stars seem to be stuck in a rut. They are churning out the same scenes over and over again. It's usually just a different location, clothes. But the positions and scene are basically the same. Even though you might think they are drop dead gorgeous you soon start to tire of the same over and over again. This maybe why so many people are still talking more about the past stars or the very top stars that have done different things over the years. Than most of the breaking through new stars.

I could name names but it's not about that. Just that the industry needs to remember one of the reasons it became so strong is that it catered for everyone. They just seem to be doing that at the moment.

I personally for one am fed up of seeing the same scene now over and over. No matter who the star is.
 
Yes you're right Poggy, repetition is the bummer here and everywhere, whatever type of porn it is.

And now that porn is easily accessible, that we can look at photo sets and watch clips or 24/7, and for free... variety and imagination becomes (to me) the key factor that will make me watch or not.

And the other key factor for me, the pornstar... the glamour. As you wrote, glamour is going down the drain and no glamour no real pornstars.

I just checked websites where guys talk about pornstar escorts and are ready to pay 1000$ an hour for them. These guys are real pornstars maniacs and they all dream of these 90s girls or girls that were known before gonzo. Of course now there are less and less of these girls available and they have to switch for the new ones and they ask each other wich ones could be good because to them they are all the same.

And yes, whatever pornstar it is, the same thing over and over again just gets annoying. Maybe it is O.K. for the many surfers that click on a link once in awhile (they don't see that repetition) but to others that look at it more frequently it is something else.
 
Gee, I didn't think that those kind of posts were permitted here at FreeOnes.

:o:rolleyes:

Regardless, a great and extrordinarily passionate one, bunker.

Very inciteful and mind stimulating.

I quid you not.

:)

Yes, I was quite into it... :computer: and at one point I felt that after the Terminator the world was ready for the

LIQUIDATOR

:ak47: the gonzo liquidator... but I am not sure about the sequel.
 

xxaru

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
Damn... I'm late to this thread, but better late than never :D. I have to say that I pretty much agree with what you've said here Bunker. One thing I see in gonzo that totally baffles me is how after the girl does her standard gonzo act... the guy (I mean half of him; cause that's all you see) just seems to magically appear out of nowhere onto the screen; already naked and aroused. I have no clue what the producers are thinking when they do that :dunno:. Talk about zero creativity.
 
Top