Next After Healthcare: Guns, Then Knives.

Next After Healthcare: Guns, Then Knives

If the media is able to get Obama a second term, he will likely use it to go after the Second Amendment. What will his Nanny State do next, after making us safe from the guns we use to defend ourselves? Take away sharp objects, starting with knives. It has already begun on the local level:

Current Boston law prohibits the sale of any folding knife with a blade over 2 inches long to a “minor” (I don’t know if they are using 18 or 21 for this definition).

After sting operations revealed to bureauweenies that conveniences stores have been selling pocket knives to minors,

Their answer was to propose a city ordinance that would require a license to sell knives. [Because that] still doesn’t prevent someone from breaking the law and continuing to sell the knives, it is easy to guess what the next step is. Use a combination of high permit pricing and denying the license to as many businesses as many as possible to create a de facto ban on cutlery sales. One official from the transit police made the statement that, in his opinion, “no law would be too onerous in preventing the sale of these ‘deadly weapons.’” I assume his reasoning is based on the old “if it saves the life of just one child” argument that no one ever really means. If they did, we would have banned bikes, high school football, and backyard swimming pools a long time ago.

At least this will make Bostonians safe from knife-wielding teenage criminals, right? Of course not:

Ban all the folders, sheath knives, box cutters and kitchen cutlery you want, but give me 5 minutes in any hardware store and I will make a shiv from something. Just to prove that point, I went to our own small town hardware and bought two 10-inch spike nails for around 75 cents each. I then devoted another couple of minutes to grinding one down to a needle sharp point. After that I wrapped the head end with a piece of cardboard and covered it with duct tape. The end result is a 5-inch blade stiletto just deadly as anything to come out of Renaissance Italy. A few more minutes spent with the duct tape and cardboard would have provided a completely serviceable “hide-out” sheath. Total cost, maybe a dollar. Any prison warden will tell you this is just basic “Convict 101.” If they can’t prevent it in prisons, it is obviously totally impossible to control on the street.

But like gun laws, knife laws target law-abiding citizens, not criminals.

Once Big Government has made us safe from knives, it will go after other sharp objects, eventually including our teeth and fingernails.
shiv.jpg

moonbattery.com
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
What's your article got to do with Obama? Tenth Amendment issue, nothing to do with the president. Articles like these demonstrate just how ill-informed you are, Sam.
 

FreeOnes_Anders

Closed Account
I'm trying really hard to give a fuck but coming from a country where carrying guns aren't allowed and the amount of murders per capita was 0,97 / 100.000 compared to the states 4,8 / 100.000 in 2011 it's really fucking hard to see what the bloody hell all this whining is about. Please note that hunters are allowed to carry rifles during hunting trips.

Oh, and our healthcare system has been funded by taxes for the last 70 years without any major issues, the issues started to arise when they decided to privatize parts of it.
 
Last edited:
Please note that hunters are allowed to carry rifles during hunting trips.
Yeah, that would be kinda hard to hunt if ya couldn't carry your gun with you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's your article got to do with Obama? Tenth Amendment issue, nothing to do with the president. Articles like these demonstrate just how ill-informed you are, Sam.

You tell me.

When the Tenth Amendment was originally proposed, the Bill of Rights did not apply to the states; it applied only to federal law. States had their own constitutions and their own bills of rights. Some states also had slavery, which was protected under the Tenth Amendment. The American Civil War made it clear that this wasn't a workable system, so the Fourteenth Amendment extended the Bill of Rights and made it applicable to both state and federal law. For this reason, the Tenth Amendment, while still relevant, no longer holds as much power as it once did.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
http://www.damianslaw.com/legal-areas/federal-knife-laws.html

All fifty states including local jurisdictions have enacted knife laws. Although laws concerning knives are mostly a state issue, federal law restricts the sale and transportation of knives. The federal law prohibits interstate trade of switchblade knives; with the sole exception of direct sale to government agencies by manufacturers.

Mostly a state issue. Tenth Amendment.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I'm unaware of any government mandated health care. If you're talking about The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, I suggest you read the bill before you criticize it.
 

LukeEl

I am a failure to the Korean side of my family
And another thing why does the doctor's stethoscope have to be so fucking cold when they place it on your chest and ask you to take a deep breath.
 
Next After Healthcare: Guns, Then Knives

If the media is able to get Obama a second term, he will likely use it to go after the Second Amendment. What will his Nanny State do next, after making us safe from the guns we use to defend ourselves? Take away sharp objects, starting with knives. It has already begun on the local level:

Current Boston law prohibits the sale of any folding knife with a blade over 2 inches long to a “minor” (I don’t know if they are using 18 or 21 for this definition).
...
Once Big Government has made us safe from knives, it will go after other sharp objects, eventually including our teeth and fingernails.

You do realize that there is a difference between municipal (city) government and the federal government, right? Of course you don't. Obama has said absolutely nothing about gun control and I dare you to prove otherwise. He is not going after your previous guns. Maybe your mayor, maybe your governor, but not the federal government. In case you haven't noticed, their a bit busy at the moment. I seriously hope your posting was meant to parody the paranoid ravings of willfully ignorant Fox News viewers. If not, I strongly urge you to find your nearest sanitarium before you end up hurting someone (or yourself).
 
You do realize that there is a difference between municipal (city) government and the federal government, right? Of course you don't. Obama has said absolutely nothing about gun control and I dare you to prove otherwise. He is not going after your previous guns. Maybe your mayor, maybe your governor, but not the federal government. In case you haven't noticed, their a bit busy at the moment. I seriously hope your posting was meant to parody the paranoid ravings of willfully ignorant Fox News viewers. If not, I strongly urge you to find your nearest sanitarium before you end up hurting someone (or yourself).

Remember this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban
 
Top