Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jazzzman" data-source="post: 8978982" data-attributes="member: 929473">I know this is old but it caught my eye.&nbsp; And I typed a reply and accidentally deleted it! <img src="https://media.freeones.com/forum/data/assets/smilies/119.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":brick:" title="Bang Head&nbsp; &nbsp; :brick:" data-shortname=":brick:" />&nbsp; So I'll type again.I applaud you for the thought and time given, and this idea has a lot of merit.&nbsp; May I suggest some reasons why you got such little response?- Your description of your idea was way too long.&nbsp; This is the internet, and people click after a few seconds, almost all of the time.&nbsp; - Your idea, as it is here, is very complex.&nbsp; It's better suited for a focus group.&nbsp; I suggest a more productive approach would have been to find a way to present your concept in a very simplified, introductory way, and see if got any traction.&nbsp; Then build on it. - Due to this complexity, the survey answers do not cover all possibilities.&nbsp; As just one example, there are all kinds of legal issues here.&nbsp; Would fo want to reach out to a model who has NO legal content ANYWHERE, and offer to pay them (for proceeds received from member payments for private time)?&nbsp; So much here to think about.&nbsp; Many people would simply not answer.- If you want response to anything, never title it &quot;My Stupid Idea.&quot;- Similarly, surveys almost never begin with extremely negative responses such as:&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1 - would like back some of those minute of my life it took to read this&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2 - absolute dislike, worst idea ever&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3 - not many worse ideas out there than this&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4 - definitely not an idea I think I would ever support- And by the way, those are all the same exact response (&quot;would not support&quot;).&nbsp; - #5 and #6 are the same response (&quot;indifferent&quot;).- #7 and #8 are the same response (I would suggest wording it as &quot;would consider&quot;).- #9, if anything, belongs in the description, instead of being a separate answer choice.&nbsp; But of course, it makes the description even longer and more complex.&nbsp; Omit, leave for later in the process.- So basically, you have 3 responses:&nbsp; no, indifferent, and would consider.&nbsp; That's all you need.I don't even know if you'll see this, but I felt like writing it.&nbsp; :dunno:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jazzzman, post: 8978982, member: 929473"] I know this is old but it caught my eye. And I typed a reply and accidentally deleted it! :brick: So I'll type again. I applaud you for the thought and time given, and this idea has a lot of merit. May I suggest some reasons why you got such little response? - Your description of your idea was way too long. This is the internet, and people click after a few seconds, almost all of the time. - Your idea, as it is here, is very complex. It's better suited for a focus group. I suggest a more productive approach would have been to find a way to present your concept in a very simplified, introductory way, and see if got any traction. Then build on it. - Due to this complexity, the survey answers do not cover all possibilities. As just one example, there are all kinds of legal issues here. Would fo want to reach out to a model who has NO legal content ANYWHERE, and offer to pay them (for proceeds received from member payments for private time)? So much here to think about. Many people would simply not answer. - If you want response to anything, never title it "My Stupid Idea." - Similarly, surveys almost never begin with extremely negative responses such as: 1 - would like back some of those minute of my life it took to read this 2 - absolute dislike, worst idea ever 3 - not many worse ideas out there than this 4 - definitely not an idea I think I would ever support - And by the way, those are all the same exact response ("would not support"). - #5 and #6 are the same response ("indifferent"). - #7 and #8 are the same response (I would suggest wording it as "would consider"). - #9, if anything, belongs in the description, instead of being a separate answer choice. But of course, it makes the description even longer and more complex. Omit, leave for later in the process. - So basically, you have 3 responses: no, indifferent, and would consider. That's all you need. I don't even know if you'll see this, but I felt like writing it. :dunno: [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

A blue eyed woman has what color eyes?