Mind the Gap - Girls with Gaps between the Thighs

Here's a feature that just drives me wild: a noticeable gap between the thighs near the pussy when the legs are closed. Sometimes I've heard this referred to as the "three finger gap." Usually it's only found on girls who are skinny or very in-shape, though I'd be very interested to see it on a girl who's not thin. Anyone else share my enthusiasm for this body feature?

Here's a few quick examples:

http://fhg.bcash4you.com/w4b/v397gv0b/?1139842
http://steamy-girls.com/palz/p111_pic.htm
http://www.steamy-girls.com/fola/p11_21x.htm
http://steamy-girls.com/polk/p11_21x.htm
http://www.newagerevenue.com/hosted/m7/019/index2.php?affid=1088530
 
Ok, this is interesting, and I think I might know what you're talking about, but I think you haven't defined it precisely enough, and you haven't really provided what I think are definitive pics. A 3-finger gap - if what? If her knees and feet are together? Because in some of those pics you gave us her knees and feet are apart, so who knows if she'd still have "the gap" if she put her legs together???

My partner is hardly in Olympic shape, but when her legs are together, I can get 3 fingers in the gap just under her pussy. Of course, then a different critique often comes into play - the dreaded "kissing thighs". If a woman DOESN'T have kissing thighs - where her inner thigh "meat" kisses at the point a few inches down from her crotch - when she's standing and her knees are a few inches apart, then she's probably in pretty good shape...

So, all I'm really saying is that You Might help other people to feed your fetish if you could define it more clearly...
 
I think you pretty much nailed it. Like you said, I'm interested in the gap between the thighs directly below the pussy when the legs are together. Sorry if it wasn't clear enough from the original post. I tried to do my best. Granted, not all the models have their knees and feet all the way together - they are modeling after all, not posing for a doctor. The pics probably could have been better, though I tried to find pics that demonstrated girls with a gap just underneath the pussy with the legs relatively close together, or at the very least girls who would clearly still have a gap if their legs were all the way together. It's not the legs that do it for me, or the gap between the thighs further down, it's the gap just below the pussy that starts my motor. Your mileage may vary.
 
So, you're cool or indifferent with kissing thighs, but she's gotta have a sub-pussy gap, right?
 
That's right. Now I feel like I messed up the title of the thread, because it's not immediately clear from the title. Oh well.
 
maybe you can show a single pic that show what you mean cause its hard to get in a gallery
 
I am starting to see how this might be hard to understand, especially since the galleries show the girls in a lot of different poses.

The last picture in this gallery
http://fhg.bcash4you.com/w4b/v397gv0b/?1100032
http://fhg.bcash4you.com/w4b/v397gv0b/middle010.jpg

First picture in this gallery
http://steamy-girls.com/palz/p111_pic.htm
http://steamy-girls.com/palz/001.jpg

Second to the last in this gallery
http://galleries2.ftvcash.com/First-Time-Video/galleries/FionaLuv/27/76/451683
http://galleries2.ftvcash.com/First-Time-Video/FionaLuv/content/76/large/14.jpg

First picture in this gallery (I was hesitant to include this one right off the bat because the gap between her thighs goes all the way down to her knees, which doesn't necessarily bother me, but goes above and beyond what I'm trying to describe.)
http://nudes.hegre-art.com/gallhit/107946/1191/1/2/0
http://nudes13.hegre-art.com/hosted/20071009-janina/1000/001.jpg

Notice how in each one there is daylight just underneath the pussy, enough to fit two or even three fingers, held horizontally, into the gap without pushing aside any thigh meat, even though the legs are all the way together or almost all the way together.

In the end, it's just a function of girls with skinny hips and skinny legs combined with the tilt of the pelvis. But as far as presentation, something about that daylight just under the pussy does it for me. Really hope that helps.
 
Haha, the intricacy of your description (which I must take the blame for to some degree, I suppose!) made me laugh out loud.

But anyway, I get ya now. That last post helped a lot...

I'll post what I find when I come across it!
 
Yeah, I sort of forgot about this thread. It's a good idea for a thread, and worth keeping one's eyes open for. I'll try to post something within the next week.
 
Nice! Next time post the galleries, because links to images usually get filtered out after a short period of time.

Right, like the 1st link has, already.
 

See, this is where I think people don't get the idea, or there are too many different ideas of what the thread theme is....

- and don't get me wrong, that was a fine and great gallery, but I don't see where it matches the thread theme, that's all I'm saying -

Sure, if a girl's legs are APART - if she's standing with her feet apart, there will be a gap between her thighs, right???

Isn't the idea here that if she stands with her feet/ankles/legs together, and her thighs are closed, that there will STILL be a gap, just below her snatch???

Isn't THIS what we're after here (I guess I'm mostly asking neighborboy, as he started the thread after all)???

http://www.nsfwdb.com/images/502.jpg

Anything like THAT - even if the pic is taken from further away??

Correct me if I'm wrong...
 
Isnt your pic a bit extreme? You would only find that huge gap on extremely thin/anorexic girls...

What we are showing here is chicks with gaps that are still healthy. Of course the gap will be less visible but i think its better that way.

I believe the gallery posted was great and reflected what the thread creator wanted (correct if wrong). The chick perfectly suits the description. Chekc out this gallery of her:)

http://content.beautyisdivine.com/hosted/francesca/1/index.html?PA=1771046

Others

pic 4 : http://www.artnudegalleries.com/exclusiveteen/1009/index.html
Liza by voronin: http://hosted.met-art.com/Full_met-art_AF_430_909/?pa=434026
 
See, this is where I think people don't get the idea, or there are too many different ideas of what the thread theme is....

- and don't get me wrong, that was a fine and great gallery, but I don't see where it matches the thread theme, that's all I'm saying -

Sure, if a girl's legs are APART - if she's standing with her feet apart, there will be a gap between her thighs, right???

Isn't the idea here that if she stands with her feet/ankles/legs together, and her thighs are closed, that there will STILL be a gap, just below her snatch???

Isn't THIS what we're after here (I guess I'm mostly asking neighborboy, as he started the thread after all)???

http://www.nsfwdb.com/images/502.jpg

Anything like THAT - even if the pic is taken from further away??

Correct me if I'm wrong...

FK is right, if the legs aren't together, there isn't any frame of reference. That pic, by the way is amazing.

Isnt your pic a bit extreme? You would only find that huge gap on extremely thin/anorexic girls...

What we are showing here is chicks with gaps that are still healthy. Of course the gap will be less visible but i think its better that way.

I believe the gallery posted was great and reflected what the thread creator wanted (correct if wrong). The chick perfectly suits the description. Chekc out this gallery of her:)

http://content.beautyisdivine.com/hosted/francesca/1/index.html?PA=1771046

Others

pic 4 : http://www.artnudegalleries.com/exclusiveteen/1009/index.html
Liza by voronin: http://hosted.met-art.com/Full_met-art_AF_430_909/?pa=434026

The first gallery is not exactly what I'm looking for. I'm looking for specifically positioned shots, not babes. The second gallery beter fits the theme of the thread.
 
Very interesting thread! I'm liking it. The gap, in my opinion, just seems so inviting. Now, combine that with big tits (natural or otherwise), and you'll have a new addiction for me.
 
Top