I saw a piece on an Idaho Militia by ABC tonight. One interesting point I gathered....
Many of them are unemployed and are collecting unemployment (g'ment mandated insurance). But say they are justified because unemployment is "insurance"...while they oppose vehemently g'ment mandated health insurance.
So the g'ment takes money from your employer (on your behalf <your money>) and adds to a fund that pays you (among others) in the event you become unemployed.
Is there THAT much of a technical difference between that and a g'ment health care bill??
Many of them are unemployed and are collecting unemployment (g'ment mandated insurance). But say they are justified because unemployment is "insurance"...while they oppose vehemently g'ment mandated health insurance.
So the g'ment takes money from your employer (on your behalf <your money>) and adds to a fund that pays you (among others) in the event you become unemployed.
Is there THAT much of a technical difference between that and a g'ment health care bill??
