MEDIA BASH: 86% of Romney coverage NEGATIVE...

You tell him. :D

Crossbreed, Mongrel

Yes. Continue to rely on other people to say things, as you never have anything of substance in your posts.

I also find it pretty offensive to refer to any person as a "Crossbreed, Mongrel." You're quite a small minded little fat man, aren't you?

Just in case you were wondering, here's how Mongrel should be used:
mon·grel
noun
1. a dog of mixed or indeterminate breed.
2. any animal or plant resulting from the crossing of different breeds or varieties.
3. any cross between different things, especially if inharmonious or indiscriminate.

Not typically used for people, except by complete fucking backwoods bastards. You have already stated that you think racial blending will destroy civilisation, but it won't. And you can't find anything that proves it will. It has been happening for hundreds of centuries.

Honestly, what the fuck is wrong with you?
 

Deepcover

Closed Account
When the extreme right wingers were busting his balls during the primaries and even Fox News carried negative stories about him, what was that, liberal bias disguised as... conservative bias? :confused: Want to avoid any (perceived) media bias against Mitt Romney? Then watch CNBC. If Larry Kudlow, Joe Kernen, Maria Bartiromo or Michelle Caruso-Cabrera express their love for Romney any more than they already are, I think they'll have a duel to see who can be the one to have Romney's love-child.

My guess is, Kudlow will get the nod. At least with him, Romney will know for sure that he banged another man. With Caruso-Cabrera and Bartiromo, there will always be that annoying twinge of doubt in his mind about what he fucked. As for Joe Kernen... even his wife won't admit to banging him.

Bottom line: if Mitt wants to pull this election out of the fire, he needs to start telling people what his specific economic plans are, and not just what the Obama Administration has done wrong. And release those tax returns already! Unlike the Obama birth certificate brouhaha that the wingnuts and moonbats foolishly hung their hats on, this tax return deal is real. If he hasn't broken any laws, he should be a man about it and just explain that he's paid a lower effective tax rate than the average secretary because the tax system allowed him too. The longer he goes on trying to be slick & sly, the more people will think that he's got a guilty conscience about something. Another Nixon we do not want or need. And that's how Mitt is beginning to come off. Some say that Obama is like Carter. OK. And that's fine. But the one guy who is still even less popular than Carter... is Nixon. ;)

You hit the nail right on the fucking head.
 
Is this the media's fault, or is it Romney's fault for being a crappy ass candidate and probably not the greatest of human beings?

I mean they could report on the positives of Romney which are....umm...which are....err....ummm...Well I'm sure there something out there somewhere in some way that isn't bad about him. Maybe he hasn't ever kicked any kittens or something.
 
Is this the media's fault, or is it Romney's fault for being a crappy ass candidate and probably not the greatest of human beings?

I mean they could report on the positives of Romney which are....umm...which are....err....ummm...Well I'm sure there something out there somewhere in some way that isn't bad about him. Maybe he hasn't ever kicked any kittens or something.

Positive..... he took a shower last month
 
Mainstream media is in the tank for Obama for 2012 just like they were in the tank for this guy in 2008... they (mainstream liberal media) never vetted him and conveniently overlooked everything that is wrong with him. They want him as president no matter how inept, deceitful and dishonest he has shown himself to be. Despite this, 2012 will be very different. It will only get worse for Barack the closer the election gets. Romney will win in a landslide... won't even be close. ;)
 
Yes. Continue to rely on other people to say things, as you never have anything of substance in your posts.

I also find it pretty offensive to refer to any person as a "Crossbreed, Mongrel." You're quite a small minded little fat man, aren't you?

Just in case you were wondering, here's how Mongrel should be used:
mon·grel
noun
1. a dog of mixed or indeterminate breed.
2. any animal or plant resulting from the crossing of different breeds or varieties.
3. any cross between different things, especially if inharmonious or indiscriminate.

Not typically used for people, except by complete fucking backwoods bastards. You have already stated that you think racial blending will destroy civilisation, but it won't. And you can't find anything that proves it will. It has been happening for hundreds of centuries.

Honestly, what the fuck is wrong with you?
Will doesn't believe in "cross-breeding". That's why he keeps it in the family.

Good, he deserves it. He's the scum of the earth


Take your own advice, Mitch.
:1orglaugh
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Mainstream media is in the tank for Obama for 2012 just like they were in the tank for this guy in 2008... they (mainstream liberal media) never vetted him and conveniently overlooked everything that is wrong with him. They want him as president no matter how inept, deceitful and dishonest he has shown himself to be. Despite this, 2012 will be very different. It will only get worse for Barack the closer the election gets. Romney will win in a landslide... won't even be close. ;)

You think Romney is a stronger candidate than Mc Cain was? Romney is empty on the surface. He's not out there selling ideas. Romney will win in a landslide? I'll take half of my track money and start shopping for odds.
 
Romney being the Republican candidate is just the product of the right wing of the Reps taking over the party. When religion and family become more important than economy and foreign policy, something is going wrong.
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Romney being the Republican candidate is just the product of the right wing of the Reps taking over the party. When religion and family become more important than economy and foreign policy, something is going wrong.

It's statements like that that makes liberals hang themselves. How dare you say that my beliefs and family have to take a back seat to foreign policy and federal economic policies. Are you are saying is that the government is more important and smarter than the people?
 
It's statements like that that makes liberals hang themselves. How dare you say that my beliefs and family have to take a back seat to foreign policy and federal economic policies. Are you are saying is that the government is more important and smarter than the people?

Unlike with economic and foreign policy matters one can, and the vast majority of the time should, keep family and religious matters to themselves and their family and not effect anybody else with them. Nearly all economic and foreign policy matters inherently effect everybody.

So yes, to other people that aren't you or your family, as long as what they do doesn't harm other people, your beliefs and family rightfully take a back seat to those people and take a back seat to the well being of society as a whole.
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Unlike with economic and foreign policy matters one can, and the vast majority of the time should, keep family and religious matters to themselves and their family and not effect anybody else with them. Nearly all economic and foreign policy matters inherently effect everybody.

So yes, to other people that aren't you or your family, as long as what they do doesn't harm other people, your beliefs and family rightfully take a back seat to those people and take a back seat to the well being of society as a whole.

I can't accept that. The NYC soda ban is a perfect example. Blanket smoking bans in bars and restaurants is another. Forced health care instead of addressing why it costs so much. No Christmas cookies at school bake sales. I may be taking these examples a bit far but all of that stuff is done," for the betterment of us as a whole". If society can be benefited by anything that doesn't take away from the individual then I am all for it. But those that want to create this perfect society want us to eat the same food, drive the same cars, teach our kids the same things, live in the same kinds of houses, and make the same wages. I may as well put on a Mao hat.
 
Top