Meanwhile in the UK, freedom of speech is getting more and more restricted

georges

Moderator
Staff member

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
try to see a bigger picture and ask why the english politicians have allowed so many foreigners into england.
who benefits from this?
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
try to see a bigger picture and ask why the english politicians have allowed so many foreigners into england.
who benefits from this?

To none, because maybe the English politicians are since the late 80's and nowadays so gutless that London has sunk to new lower standards thanks to Saddiq Khan.
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
'We love you, Donald, we do': The Britons who want a Trump of their own
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...tm_medium=app&utm_campaign=push_notifications

Watch: Chanting Brits Openly Defy Mayor Sadiq Khan, Give Trump Jaw-Dropping Welcome
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/w...&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2019-06-03

If You Thought the Churchill Bust Was Great, Queen Elizabeth’s Gift to Trump Is a Perfect Follow-up: Churchill First Edition
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/t...&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2019-06-03
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
UK Companies Showing a Boy with a Toy Gun & Girl with a Doll Can Now Face Fines, Sanctions
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/u...ff_campaign=pushtraffic&ff_content=2019-06-22

Such a level of stupidity is beyond alarming and mindblowing :facepalm::rolleyes:

Yes, it really, really is. I came across a news story just a couple of weeks ago about how some relatively generic (I thought) ads were banned for violating some nanny state law concerning gender stereotyping. Here's one story I just found about this utterly ridiculous law.

First ads banned for contravening UK gender stereotyping rules

Two television ads, one featuring new dads bungling comically while looking after their babies and the other a woman sitting next to a pram, have become the first to be banned under new rules designed to reduce gender stereotyping.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) banned the ads for Philadelphia cream cheese and Volkswagen, following complaints from the public that they perpetuated harmful stereotypes.

The new rules, introduced at the beginning of the year, ban the depiction of men and women engaged in gender-stereotypical activities to help stop “limiting how people see themselves and how others see them and the life decisions they take”.

I expect California to be the first state in the U.S. to follow the lead of their nanny state comrades in Europe. There's already a feminazi organization that is giving its "Gender Balanced Production" seal of approval to Hollywood movies. I'm not talking about art house or indie projects here. I mean major Hollyweird movies. Look for the symbol at the end of the next movie that you go to (waste your money on). And the SJWs in California state govt. have already followed Europe's lead by passing a (possibly unconstitutional) law which mandates that companies must meet certain gender quotas when it comes to females on corporate boards (even though it's shareholders who decide who serves on the board): New California Law Imposing Gender Diversity on Boards of Publicly Held Corporations Raises Constitutional Concerns. But in this time of snowflakes and SJWs, that's not something that these people can understand or respect. The state will decide. The state will make it right. The state will socially engineer, and even ignore the Constitution, in order to get the results that it wants. The state... The state... By any means necessary... :facepalm:

Che-Guevara-Hot-Wallpapers-43.jpg
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Yes, it really, really is. I came across a news story just a couple of weeks ago about how some relatively generic (I thought) ads were banned for violating some nanny state law concerning gender stereotyping. Here's one story I just found about this utterly ridiculous law.

First ads banned for contravening UK gender stereotyping rules



I expect California to be the first state in the U.S. to follow the lead of their nanny state comrades in Europe. There's already a feminazi organization that is giving its "Gender Balanced Production" seal of approval to Hollywood movies. I'm not talking about art house or indie projects here. I mean major Hollyweird movies. Look for the symbol at the end of the next movie that you go to (waste your money on). And the SJWs in California state govt. have already followed Europe's lead by passing a (possibly unconstitutional) law which mandates that companies must meet certain gender quotas when it comes to females on corporate boards (even though it's shareholders who decide who serves on the board): New California Law Imposing Gender Diversity on Boards of Publicly Held Corporations Raises Constitutional Concerns. But in this time of snowflakes and SJWs, that's not something that these people can understand or respect. The state will decide. The state will make it right. The state will socially engineer, and even ignore the Constitution, in order to get the results that it wants. The state... The state... By any means necessary... :facepalm:

Che-Guevara-Hot-Wallpapers-43.jpg

Very good analysis but this is what one has to expect from leftists and most especially Democraps.
 
Top