Liberal Fact-Checker Snopes Caught Approving ‘Wildly Misleading,’ Anti-GOP Fake News

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Yeah wth they only get it right about 95% of the time, including when their checking supports conservatives, which it often does (though we never hear about that from the terminally persecuted).
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
Yeah wth they only get it right about 95% of the time, including when their checking supports conservatives, which it often does (though we never hear about that from the terminally persecuted).

No, they are not and they are all Obama muppets, reason why to never trust them
 
I like how Trumptards picture Obama as the one guy who's pulling the strings of everything and everyone's that's not 200% pro-Trump :facepalm:
Totally accurate, not caricatural at all, not ridiculous at all...

Guys's you've been telling that over and over about Soros for decades, changing the name on the person pulling the strings doesn't make it more trustworthy
 
Yeah wth they only get it right about 95% of the time, including when their checking supports conservatives, which it often does (though we never hear about that from the terminally persecuted).

Liberals fact checking liberals so they get it 95 percent right.

:1orglaugh
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
I like how Trumptards picture Obama as the one guy who's pulling the strings of everything and everyone's that's not 200% pro-Trump :facepalm:
Totally accurate, not caricatural at all, not ridiculous at all...

Guys's you've been telling that over and over about Soros for decades, changing the name on the person pulling the strings doesn't make it more trustworthy

Obama's presidency has been a catastrophe except for democraps, leftists, unpatriotic and desillusionned people . So yes, snopes is beyond ridiculous and not credible at all. Soros backed up a lot the worst democrat candidates and presidents ever such as Bill Clinton and Obama and that is enough not to trust a candidate backed up by Soros.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Obama's presidency has been a catastrophe except for democraps, leftists, unpatriotic and desillusionned people . So yes, snopes is beyond ridiculous and not credible at all. Soros backed up a lot the worst democrat candidates and presidents ever such as Bill Clinton and Obama and that is enough not to trust a candidate backed up by Soros.

If by, "catastrophe" you mean, "A Black Man Was President!!11! zomg!!11!", yes, yes, indeed. You apparently don't know much about George Soros other than that he donates to liberal causes. Again, zomg!!11!, how horrible.
 

Luxman

#TRE45ON
Only reality and facts are Anti-GOP
 
I asked snopes and they told me this is all bullshit
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20181210-094201.png
    Screenshot_20181210-094201.png
    160.7 KB · Views: 105
:( snopes isn't fake news if I snopes it
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20181210-094142.png
    Screenshot_20181210-094142.png
    140.8 KB · Views: 94
...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/snopes/


Snopes - Least Biased
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Founded in 1994 by Barbara and David Mikkelson, Snopes.com, also known as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, was one of the first online fact-checking websites. It is a resource for validating and debunking such stories in American popular culture. Snopes ownership has said that the site receives more complaints of liberal bias than conservative bias, but insists that the same debunking standards are applied to all political claims and urban legends.

Funded by / Ownership

According to their about page, Snopes.com is an independent publication owned by Snopes Media Group. Snopes derives funding from online advertising as well as donations. They fully disclose funding and expenses, as well as listing any donation over $10,000. For example, they list that Facebook paid them $100,000 and the James Randi Educational Foundation awarded them $75,000.

Analysis / Bias

In 2012, FactCheck.org reviewed a sample of Snopes’ responses to political rumors regarding George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, and Barack Obama, and found them to be free from bias in all cases. Critics of the site have made the false claim that the website is funded by billionaire philanthropist George Soros, which has been debunked many times as they are funded through advertising and donations, which they disclose.

In review, Snopes is a signatory of the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN) that is run by the Poynter Institute. Snopes has been independently verified by the IFCN, which lists its core principles as: “non-partisanship and fairness, transparency of sources, transparency of funding and organization, transparency of methodology, and open and honest corrections policy.” Snopes meets this criteria, along with 50+ other fact checkers world wide. Of note, Media Bias Fact Check only uses IFCN fact checkers when checking claims and evaluating sources.

Snopes always openly sources their information and avoids emotional wording, though they do occasionally publish news stories that offer some opinions. Snopes is frequently accused of liberal bias by some on the right. For example, the Daily Express of the UK and the Daily Caller have both criticized Snopes for fact checks they felt were wrong or biased against the right. According to research performed by Real Clear Politics in the article: Snopes and Editorializing Fact Checks, they determined that out of the six fact checkers working with Facebook, “that Snopes is the least likely to fact-check matters of opinion.” This is important because opinion is something that cannot be fact checked. The article went on to say “We have found that since we started our project, Snopes has fact-checked opinions only 2 percent of the time. In other words, 98 percent of the time it sticks to matters of verifiable fact. Such an achievement is even more remarkable given that during this period, Snopes has produced the second-most articles of the six fact-checking outfits.”

Finally, MBFC has an article detailing why we rate Snopes least biased that you can view here.

Overall, we rate Snopes Least Biased and High for factual reporting based on transparency and proper sourcing of information.
 
...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/snopes/


Snopes - Least Biased
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180

History

Founded in 1994 by Barbara and David Mikkelson, Snopes.com, also known as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, was one of the first online fact-checking websites. It is a resource for validating and debunking such stories in American popular culture. Snopes ownership has said that the site receives more complaints of liberal bias than conservative bias, but insists that the same debunking standards are applied to all political claims and urban legends.

Funded by / Ownership

According to their about page, Snopes.com is an independent publication owned by Snopes Media Group. Snopes derives funding from online advertising as well as donations. They fully disclose funding and expenses, as well as listing any donation over $10,000. For example, they list that Facebook paid them $100,000 and the James Randi Educational Foundation awarded them $75,000.

Analysis / Bias

In 2012, FactCheck.org reviewed a sample of Snopes’ responses to political rumors regarding George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, and Barack Obama, and found them to be free from bias in all cases. Critics of the site have made the false claim that the website is funded by billionaire philanthropist George Soros, which has been debunked many times as they are funded through advertising and donations, which they disclose.

In review, Snopes is a signatory of the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN) that is run by the Poynter Institute. Snopes has been independently verified by the IFCN, which lists its core principles as: “non-partisanship and fairness, transparency of sources, transparency of funding and organization, transparency of methodology, and open and honest corrections policy.” Snopes meets this criteria, along with 50+ other fact checkers world wide. Of note, Media Bias Fact Check only uses IFCN fact checkers when checking claims and evaluating sources.

Snopes always openly sources their information and avoids emotional wording, though they do occasionally publish news stories that offer some opinions. Snopes is frequently accused of liberal bias by some on the right. For example, the Daily Express of the UK and the Daily Caller have both criticized Snopes for fact checks they felt were wrong or biased against the right. According to research performed by Real Clear Politics in the article: Snopes and Editorializing Fact Checks, they determined that out of the six fact checkers working with Facebook, “that Snopes is the least likely to fact-check matters of opinion.” This is important because opinion is something that cannot be fact checked. The article went on to say “We have found that since we started our project, Snopes has fact-checked opinions only 2 percent of the time. In other words, 98 percent of the time it sticks to matters of verifiable fact. Such an achievement is even more remarkable given that during this period, Snopes has produced the second-most articles of the six fact-checking outfits.”

Finally, MBFC has an article detailing why we rate Snopes least biased that you can view here.

Overall, we rate Snopes Least Biased and High for factual reporting based on transparency and proper sourcing of information.

LOL at that bullshit.
I know, the left doesn’t want our guns either.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&sou...aw1cVeyz-CWZgf2xGu3cuk4a&ust=1544548413328779
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
The dumb, immoral, and criminal Christian conservative far right always loves to throw out the scary boogeyman George Soros. Soros is a horrible person because he's a librul and supports librul causes, what a sunuvabitch.
 
Top