[SCENE REQUEST] "¡La Pelinegra!" scene from Culioneros

[ramonfreeones]

I hope it's not too much trouble if you can help me with this:

I'm looking for this photo gallery:

That those pictures are supposed to belong to this scene:

https://members.culioneros.com/product/136/movie/92539

Of the model: Luchy

However, I can't find them anywhere. They are not found in the gallery of that scene.


Can you help me find them, please? ☹️

 

[John_8581]

However, I can't find them anywhere. They are not found in the gallery of that scene.

Can you help me find them, please? ☹️

My Chrome browser hasn't been working well with their new Legacy program. But in Firefox, it's working. So I'm back and forth between the two browsers.

I'm posting this from Chrome, referring back to the scene in Firefox.

Her indexxx entry .... (her indexxx profile picture is the same as your first picture)

https://www.indexxx.com/m/luchy

Lists nine scenes.(just as the Bang Bros Culioneros site has)

Here is the bus ...

Two rows away is the yellow seat cushion. Scene is called, "¡La Pelinegra!"

She is on the bus again, in "La Blanquita" (the yellow seat cushion is right behind her)

Though neither scene has really good solo pics. They go into hardcore action (with the guy) almost immediately.

My guess is that your pictures are from "¡La Pelinegra!" - I agree with you there.

They might have done two photo galleries for these bus scenes but kept the hardcore pics removing her solo pictures primarily. Another possibilty? The batch of solo pictures may have been corrupted thus forcing them to use the hardcore pics here. If that happened, then the photographer won't be able to re-produce them and her solo pics from the scene will be lost forever.

 

[ramonfreeones]

Many thanks once again @John_8581 for taking the time and confirming this case in detail.

I was very confused not to find those photos and I even thought it was another model. But it also seems very strange to me. Even the photos that are not there, the photos that I found, do not have any logo or watermark. I don't know if they were ever really published or the assumptions you make. I'm also wondering if anyone has them

 

[John_8581]

Photos without a logo or watermark? Could very well be at xhamster before the G-D-P incident. I'm talking five to ten years before. In fact, the owners of xhamster highly promoted and recommended that their members put up photos without their logo or watermark. Sure it led to content sharing and such, but it came down to Google searches. Most google searches directed people to xhamster so xhamster maintained high internet traffic rates.

https://www.freeones.com/forums/threads/girlsdoporn-read-and-digest.999983/

Now, since G-D-P, xhamster is like a wasteland. Just like Pornhub. No pictures anywhere. And if a picture does show up in the fading cache of Google, Yandex, or Tineye -- they are met with huge https:// 404 error page removal errors that are currently occurring over at xhamster.

Put your two pictures from post # 1 into a Tineye or Yandex reverse image search. See what comes up. Good luck.

 

[ramonfreeones]

Tank you! Very interesting. I really had no idea that about xHamster and is the first time I know about G-D-P 😯 That sounds very similar to the case of Ϻ0Ϻ P0\/ site because even apparently their videos are of the same style. I really don't know if they were the same people behind that.

And you probably won't believe it, but the images I posted, I found them using Yandex and Tineye from Luchy's profile photo in Culioneros, just when I realized that the photo they used as their profile photo was nowhere to be found 🔍 And as you can see, none of those images has the Culioneros site, very surely for the reasons that you mention.