Kuwaiti Official: "We Should Never Allow Refugees in our Country"

[Al-Namrood]

Kuwaiti Official Fahad Al Shalami refers to Syrian refugees as "psychologically disturbed"

 

[Will E Worm]

Refugees


Smart move.

But, would they except people who would not be a detriment to their country?

 

[zeeblofowl_1969]

Refugees


Smart move.

But, would they except people who would not be a detriment to their country?

I have no idea why you would want to if your indeginious population doesn't benefit there is zero motivation.

 

[Johan]

Kuwaiti Official Fahad Al Shalami refers to Syrian refugees as "psychologically disturbed"

Ok but what's your point ? Do you think Europe and in the US should do the same ?

 

[zeeblofowl_1969]

Ok but what's your point ? Do you think Europe and in the US should do the same ?

Europe should do as they see fit I just don't see the upside in doing such things.

 

[Will E Worm]

Ok but what's your point ? Do you think Europe and in the US should do the same ?

Yes, even Mexico does this.

Mexico has very strict laws pertaining to both illegal and legal immigrants.[25] The Mexican constitution restricts non-citizens or foreign-born persons from participating in politics, holding office, acting as a member of the clergy, or serving on the crews of Mexican-flagged ships or airplanes. Certain legal rights are waived, such as the right to a deportation hearing or other legal motions. In cases of flagrante delicto, any person may make a citizen's arrest on the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities.
Mexico will start deportations if too many immigrants threaten their culture or identity.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/?page=all

https://factreal.wordpress.com/2010...-states-mexican-immigration-laws-are-tougher/

http://www.newsmax.com/US/border-patrol-deport-illegals/2015/01/06/id/616828/


http://townhall.com/columnists/mich...ats-undesirable-foreigners-n1550120/page/full


• The Mexican constitution guarantees that immigrants will never be treated as real Mexican citizens, even if they are legally naturalized.
Article 32 bans foreigners, immigrants, and even naturalized citizens of Mexico from serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports:

“In order to belong to the National Navy or the Air Force, and to discharge any office or commission, it is required to be a Mexican by birth. This same status is indispensable for captains, pilots, masters, engineers, mechanics, and in general, for all personnel of the crew of any vessel or airship protected by the Mexican merchant flag or insignia. It is also necessary to be Mexican by birth to discharge the position of captain of the port and all services of practique and airport commandant, as well as all functions of customs agent in the Republic.”

• An immigrant who becomes a naturalized Mexican citizen can be stripped of his Mexican citizenship if he lives again in the country of his origin for more than five years, under Article 37. Mexican-born citizens risk no such loss.

 

[knowone]

I have no idea why you would want to if your indeginious population doesn't benefit there is zero motivation.

Maybe they correctly feel they have a debt to the people of their fellow nations. In 1990 Iraq invaded their country and practically all of their government/business leaders were themselves refugees (although rich ones). The Coalition that threw out the Iraqi army and gave them back their country included several of their neighboring counties. So yes they should help now even if there's no direct benefit.

 

[Johan]

Yes, even Mexico does this.

So, you think Europe and the US should take example on third-world countries such as Mexico and muslim countries such a Kuwait ? I strongly disagree.
To me, things should be the other way round : muslim countries or third-world countries should take example on us, not the contrary. Our western civiliused countries should act as beacons of freedom, tolerance and progressiveness for the rest of the world, not the other way round.

 

[Will E Worm]

So, you think Europe and the US should take example on third-world countries such as Mexico and muslim countries such a Kuwait ? I strongly disagree.
To me, things should be the other way round : muslim countries or third-world countries should take example on us, not the contrary. Our western civiliused countries should act as beacons of freedom, tolerance and progressiveness for the rest of the world, not the other way round.

So, let people invade our countries, murder, rape and so forth. Bad idea. :nono:

 

[Al-Namrood]

Ok but what's your point ? Do you think Europe and in the US should do the same ?

off course

muslim always saying: "every muslim is a brother to another muslim"

funny fact, their another brother didnt help, where is your muslim brother?? :1orglaugh

even their brother use their stright d*ck head for not accepting different people :rofl:



______________
bonus

___________________________________________

 

[Little Red Wagon Repairman]

Has anybody learned anything over the past months and year how much damage even a few of these bad apples can do? I'm sure many of these Muslim refugees are truly innocent fleeing death but has this situation improved any European countries? Are your women safer? Are your streets cleaner? Is your nation more united? Do you have a better future? Are your immigrants as tolerant as you, appreciate the charity and hospitality you've given them, and plan on assimilating and adopting your values? Are you more or less apt to suffer terrorist attacks by increasing the number of Muslims in your countries?

Why have your leaders put this burden upon you and how did many get taken advantage of so easily? Ensure the safety and welfare of your own people first. I know many of you mean well but these people will and are changing your countries for the worse. I only know what I read but you are the ones truly facing this. I want and wish the best for you but you must save yourself.