xfire
New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
When Rachel Maddow aired Trump's tax return that was entirely factual information.
That wasn't entirely factual, and why are you throwing Maddow up as an example?
When Rachel Maddow aired Trump's tax return that was entirely factual information.
That wasn't entirely factual, and why are you throwing Maddow up as an example?
because you threw MSNBC up as an example of those who don't provide factual dissemention. how wasn't Trump's tax return entirely factual? That was in fact his actual tax return. Maddow's take on it was certainly biased and her lead up was misleading.
It wasn't a complete document. Maddow is great at opinion and analysis, but I wouldn't turn to her for straight information. I tuned to Fox News for about five minutes last night during Ingraham's hour, she had Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr on her panel. I found out everything I needed to know about where Fox is currently at in that five minutes, "We don't have enough information", was the sentiment from both Starr and Dershowitz.
in that example, isn't "we don't have enough information" actually a credit to them instead of coming to conclusions on not enough information or simply making it up?
how many retractions has Fox News had to issue versus say CNN, the Washington Post or the New York Times?
Fox News doesn't issue retractions, they just ignore all the shit they get wrong or lie about.
actually, they have, most notably, the Seth Rich story.
So you should issue a retraction to your own claim.
Also if you're interested in ACTUALLY reading a study on the issue of crime and immigration rather than reading what the medias want you to know about it, here you are
But if you're only nterested in the short version, here's the conclusion to the study :
View attachment 678228