I **** Self-shot b/g porn

Ive been noticing lately more and more models doing b/g porn with boyfriends/ husbands on sites like onlyfans. The big problem with this is that its crap porn, because they never have a third person holding the camera. So the angles are crap. Even with POV angles you need a third person holding the camera. I would rather models just not do b/g porn at all if they dont have a cameraman. The self-shot b/g porn is so bad all it does is ruin the novelty of the model. Anyone agree?
 

John_8581

FreeOnes Lifetime Member
I was just watching a POV scene recently, the girl was on her knees giving him a blow job. Suddenly, it looked like an earthquake. Seriously. He was shaking so much that he couldn't hold the camera steady. She was amazing. Him? Not so much.
 

maildude

Postal Paranoiac
You're right. You'd think they would realize this problem, considering in most cases a porn film has an entire crew, and still looks like ****.
 
Maildude: you got that right. Quite a few of the videos I've seen recently have HORRIBLE lighting. Shot outside, or with the light behind one of the .. participants, so the SHADOWS obscure all the action.. Or one of the participants has their arm blocking the woman's tits. Or, the guy's grabbing onto the woman while missionary - and again, you can't see anything. The basics!!
 
POV porn is my all-time favorite - if done correctly, of course. The fact that the only part of the guy I see is his dick kind of helps me to enjoy the scene. Dick is fine, no need to see the rest.

You guys should check out the Czech Parties videos. Some really good stuff. I think the quality depends mostly on the type of camera they use.
 

FreeOnes_Adam

FO Admin - 19 Cents of Magical Cock (her/shey)
I think we're going see a lot more self-shot material as things like OnlyFans are on the rise. More reason to support your producers!
 

Luxman

#TRE45ON
Top