• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Introduces Legislation to Stop Arming Terrorists

The Penis Mightier

Kameltoe Harris = Poop
Phttps://gabbard.house.gov/news/pres...introduces-legislation-stop-arming-terrorists

VIDEO: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Introduces Legislation to Stop Arming Terrorists

Washington, DC—Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (HI-02) introduced the Stop Arming Terrorists Act today. The legislation would prohibit the U.S. government from using American taxpayer dollars to provide funding, weapons, training, and intelligence support to groups like the Levant Front, Fursan al Ha and other allies of Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, al-Qaeda and ISIS, or to countries who are providing direct or indirect support to those same groups.

The legislation is cosponsored by Reps. Peter Welch (D-VT-AL), Barbara Lee (D-CA-13), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA-48), and Thomas Massie (R-KY-04), and supported by the Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) and the U.S. Peace Council.

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said, “Under U.S. law it is illegal for any American to provide money or assistance to al-Qaeda, ISIS or other terrorist groups. If you or I gave money, weapons or support to al-Qaeda or ISIS, we would be thrown in jail. Yet the U.S. government has been violating this law for years, quietly supporting allies and partners of al-Qaeda, ISIL, Jabhat Fateh al Sham and other terrorist groups with money, weapons, and intelligence support, in their fight to overthrow the Syrian government.

“The CIA has also been funneling weapons and money through Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and others who provide direct and indirect support to groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. This support has allowed al-Qaeda and their fellow terrorist organizations to establish strongholds throughout Syria, including in Aleppo.

“A recent New York Times article confirmed that ‘rebel groups’ supported by the U.S. ‘have entered into battlefield alliances with the affiliate of al-Qaeda in Syria, formerly known as al Nusra.’ This alliance has rendered the phrase ‘moderate rebels’ meaningless. Reports confirm that ‘every armed anti-Assad organization unit in those provinces [of Idlib and Aleppo] is engaged in a military structure controlled by [al-Qaeda’s] Nusra militants.’

“A recent Wall Street Journal article reported that many rebel groups are ‘doubling down on their alliance’ with al Nusra. Some rebel groups are renewing their alliance, while others, like Nour al-Din al-Zinki, a former CIA-backed group and one of the largest factions in Aleppo are joining for the first time. “The Syria Conquest Front—formerly known as the al-Qaeda-linked Nusra Front—is deeply intermingled with armed opposition groups of all stripes across Syria’s battlefields.”

“The CIA has long been supporting a group called Fursan al Haqq, providing them with salaries, weapons and support, including surface to air missiles. This group is cooperating with and fighting alongside an al-Qaeda affiliated group trying to overthrow the Syrian government. The Levant Front is another so-called moderate umbrella group of Syrian opposition fighters. Over the past year, the United States has been working with Turkey to give this group intelligence support and other forms of military assistance. This group has joined forces with al-Qaeda’s offshoot group in Syria.

“This madness must end. We must stop arming terrorists. The Government must end this hypocrisy and abide by the same laws that apply to its’ citizens.

“That is why I’ve introduced the Stop Arming Terrorists bill—legislation based on congressional action during the Iran-Contra affair to stop the CIA’s illegal arming of rebels in Nicaragua. It will prohibit any Federal agency from using taxpayer dollars to provide weapons, cash, intelligence, or any support to al-Qaeda, ISIS and other terrorist groups, and it will prohibit the government from funneling money and weapons through other countries who are directly or indirectly supporting terrorists,” concluded Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.

Stephen Kinzer, a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University, and award-winning author and journalist said, “The proposal to stop sending weapons to insurgents in Syria is based on the principle that pouring arms into a war zone only intensifies suffering and makes peace more difficult to achieve. Congress made a decision like this about the Nicaraguan contras during the 1980s. Aid to the contras was cut off by the Boland Amendment. The result was a peace process that finally brought an end to wars not only in Nicaragua, but also in El Salvador and Guatemala. This is the example we should be following. Cutting off arms shipments forces belligerents to negotiate. That is what we achieved in Nicaragua. It should be our goal in Syria as well.”

Donna Smith, Executive Director of Progressive Democrats of America said, "Progressive Democrats of America believes that it is fundamentally wrong for the United States to fund those groups or individuals aligned with al-Qaeda, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, ISIS, or other terrorist/extremist organizations. The 'Stop Arming Terrorists' bill authored by Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, of Hawaii's 2nd Congressional District, would help bring an end to the human tragedy unfolding in Syria where the haunting eyes of the innocent children of Aleppo call on us all to stop supporting those who threaten and kill them with ferocious intention. War is war, and terrorism is terrorism whether waged by the state or from external forces. PDA supports this measure."

Alfred Marder, President of the U.S. Peace Council said, “The U.S. Peace Council is honored to endorse and support the ‘Stop Arming Terrorists Bill’ as a major contribution to peace. This legislation will serve to galvanize the anti-war movement and the opposition to regime change policies that characterize our present foreign policy.”

Background: The Stop Arming Terrorists bill prohibits U.S. government funds from being used to support al-Qaeda, ISIS or other terrorist groups. In the same way that Congress passed the Boland Amendment to prohibit the funding and support to CIA backed-Nicaraguan Contras during the 1980’s, this bill would stop CIA or other Federal government activities in places like Syria by ensuring U.S. funds are not used to support al-Qaeda, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, ISIS, or other terrorist groups working with them. It would also prohibit the Federal government from funding assistance to countries that are directly or indirectly supporting those terrorist groups. The bill achieves this by:

Making it illegal for any U.S. Federal government funds to be used to provide assistance covered in this bill to terrorists. The assistance covered includes weapons, munitions, weapons platforms, intelligence, logistics, training, and cash.
Making it illegal for the U.S. government to provide assistance covered in the bill to any nation that has given or continues to give such assistance to terrorists.
Requiring the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to determine the individual and groups that should be considered terrorists, for the purposes of this bill, by determining: (a) the individuals and groups that are associated with, affiliated with, adherents to or cooperating with al-Qaeda, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, or ISIS; (b) the countries that are providing assistance covered in this bill to those individuals or groups.
Requiring the DNI to review and update the list of countries and groups to which assistance is prohibited every six months, in consultation with the House Foreign Affairs and Armed Services Committees, as well as the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
Requiring the DNI to brief Congress on the determinations.
###


Levant Front (U.S. backed, via the MOC in Turkey) is working under an Ahrar al Sham led umbrella group: http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/December 2 EDITS COT_2.pdf ; U.S. support for Levant Front: http://carnegie-mec.org/diwan/57605?lang=en ; CIA groups cooperated with Jayesh al-Fateh http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...syria-program-and-the-perils-of-proxies.html; U.S. weapons arriving in Syria through covert, CIA-led program, via Saudi Arabia and Turkey; CIA can provide support http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-syria-obama-order-idUSBRE8701OK20120802


 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Hold on. So after 9/11 most Americans were on board with Invading Afghanistan under the pretense of "We are looking for Osama". He's in one of those caves an by golly we're gonna get him.
Kinda like how Roscoe P. Coletrain was gonna get them Duke boys..... Coo, Coo.
Then Iraq because Saddam was a crazy A-Rab and it was pay back time for 9/11 and the only good A Rab is a dead A Rab.

Am I correct so far?

Sold 2 wars which cost millions of lives and trillions of dollars.


Then along comes Barry.
He ran his campaign in 08 promising to end the wars. By then you had many anti war protesters (who apparently turned out to be just anti Bush protesters brainwashed by the US controlled media).
Boy they played us like fucking fiddles. Not me though. I saw exactly what Barry was from day one.

So now its the 1st term for Barry. Hiliary got to be SOS as a consolation prize ( a very very lucrative one as we now know) and Mccain got to play the losing idiot but still retain his Senator job as leader of the Warhawk Division.

But now they can't just go around openly invading country after country in Africa and the Middle East like was the plan all along under a PREZ who ran on ending wars and who got the Noble Peice of Junk Prize just for showing up.

What to do, What to do?
I got it!
Lets create mercenary armies with scary names made up mostly of the very people we claim to be our enemies.
We'll arm them to the teeth and fund them handsomely through Saudi Arabia and Qatar by giving them billions in weapons.
Then we can use them to destroy Libya, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, and anybody else who doesn't do what we tell them to do.
We can kill more millions of innocent civilians and steal trillions of dollars of wealth. We can reap all that profit and not even get blamed.
It was Al Queaeauda and ISIS, not us. Honest baby I swear.
And we can use them as an excuse to promote even more invasions and rape the American People of trillions more "for their protection".
We can even fake mass killings by A Rabs shouting Allah Akbar around the globe just to keep people freaked out and scared.
And we can use the wars as an excuse to overwhelm countries of the EU with millions of "refugees" pouring in non stop who will in a generation or two destroy those countries as well.

THEN WE CAN RULE SUPREME!
Who are we? Well we are the Zionist Globalists who control the worlds money supply of course.
We have unlimited wealth and we can buy anybody. We could make traitors out of Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, and Samuel Adams if we had the chance.

I can't make it any more clearer. Everything I've been saying here the past year is true.
The US is owned. It's leaders 100% comprimised. The so called terrorists are employed by the US GOV.
The whole entire "War on Terror" is and always was bullshit. 100% bullshit.
What the fuck does it even mean anyway? Is it like the same as the war on Scary Stuff?
Time to face the fact that we've been duped and now put an end to it while we maybe still can.

Love your country all you want but wake up and realize its been taken over by criminals who have sold their souls to the devil.
All that matters to them is the here and now. They believe in nothing.
 
Ripping the military-industrial complex from some of their clients ? Good luck with that !
 
Sold 2 wars which cost millions of lives and trillions of dollars.

Read "millions of lives" and thought 'that seems like an exaggeration'. Let's see what the internet has to say:

http://www.commondreams.org/news/20...east-1.3-million-lives-lost-us-led-war-terror

"In their joint report— Body Count: Casualty Figures after 10 Years of the 'War on Terror—Physicians for Social Responsibility, Physicians for Global Survival, and the Nobel Prize-winning International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War concluded that this number is staggering, with at least 1.3 million lives lost in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan alone since the onset of the war following September 11, 2001."

Wow. If one is being pedantic, "millions" might still be a bit of a stretch though not to the degree I originally thought. Mea Culpa.
 
Top