There's a Black History Month but no White History Month, no Latin History Month, no Asian History Month...
You know how it's called when people are treated differently because of their race ? Racism. Black History Month is racist
Yep, but the simple fact that people from a certain race have a special month called "black history month" is racist. It should be Black History Month all year long. Ad Asian History Month, Latin History Month, White History Month, Arab History Month, etc...It's not racist. Everyone's the same. Flip your hands over and look at your palms. Everyone in world ... has the same color. Regardless of race.![]()
![]()
Yep, but the simple fact that people from a certain race have a special month called "black history month" is racist. It should be Black History Month all year long. Ad Asian History Month, Latin History Month, White History Month, Arab History Month, etc...
When you're not sure wether something is racist or not, there's a silmple test : make it about jews. Just imagine how people would go nut over "Jew History Month".
Two wrongs don't make a right.
There's a Black History Month but no White History Month, no Latin History Month, no Asian History Month...
You know how it's called when people are treated differently because of their race ? Racism. Black History Month is racist
The Darkies need to get over themselves. I get it. We all have to pay because of slavery. Slavery wasn't as bad as they make it out to be. Those slaves had a roof over their head and they got fed daily. Get over it
Yep, since the Democrat party is the party of the KKK and Jim Crow, I’d say you are spot on.
And for the umpteenth time, those southern democrats were all staunch conservatives.
all hail conservatism!
And for the eleventy billionth time they were not. There was no “ conservative” movement back during that time. Those same democrats believed in higher taxes and bigger government. You don’t get to erase the dark history of the Democrat party just because you want to.
Even in the 1960’s Robert Byrd and Al Gore Sr. remained Democrats.
Oh lordy please...are you actually trying to build a case that those democrats were NOT social conservatives? That they did NOT want, above all other things, to conserve their society as it had been and was - meaning white supremacist and institutionally discriminatory? If so, do you actually expect anyone who knows anything about history to buy that?
Do you further expect anyone to believe that dixiecrats and their former confederate ancestors were advocates for a large, powerful federal government?
Seriously??
ps: as discussed before the Byrd card carries zero weight being as the guy ended up being an outspoken critic of who and what he'd once been.
And for the umpteenth time, those southern democrats were all staunch conservatives.
all hail conservatism!
It still baffles me how people still don't know the difference between political ideology and party affiliation. You're correct that the southern Democrats subscribed to conservatism. They argued on the grounds of states' rights. A key pillar of conservatism. The ****** of American conservatism, William F. Buckley, was against the civil rights movement. FFS he supported white supremacy. https://adamgomez.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/whythesouthmustprevail-1957.pdf