Google Drops A Nuclear Bomb On Microsoft. And It’s Made of Chrome

Will Google Os make a difference


  • Total voters
    23
Google Drops A Nuclear Bomb On Microsoft. And It’s Made of Chrome.

Wow. So you know all those whispers about a Google desktop operating system that never seem to go away? You thought they might with the launch of Android, Google’s mobile OS. But they persisted. And for good reason, because it’s real.

In the second half of 2010, Google plans to launch the Google Chrome OS, an operating system designed from the ground up to run the Chrome web browser on netbooks. “It’s our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be,” Google writes tonight on its blog.

But let’s be clear on what this really is. This is Google dropping the mother of bombs on its chief rival, Microsoft. It even says as much in the first paragraph of its post, “However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web.” Yeah, who do you think they mean by that?

And it’s a genius play. So many people are buying netbooks right now, but are running WIndows XP on them. Windows XP is 8 years old. It was built to run on Pentium IIIs and Pentium 4s. Google Chrome OS is built to run on both x86 architecture chips and ARM chips, like the ones increasingly found in netbooks. It is also working with multiple OEMs to get the new OS up and running next year.

Obviously, this Chrome OS will be lightweight and fast just like the browser itself. But also just like the browser, it will be open-sourced. Think Microsoft will be open-sourcing Windows anytime soon?

As Google writes, “We have a lot of work to do, and we’re definitely going to need a lot of help from the open source community to accomplish this vision.” They might as well set up enlistment booths on college campuses for their war against Microsoft.

Google says the software architecture will basically be the current Chrome browser running inside “a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel.” So in other words, it basically is the web as an OS. And applications developers will develop for it just as they would on the web. This is similar to the approach Palm has taken with its new webOS for the Palm Pre, but Google notes that any app developed for Google Chrome OS will work in any standards-compliant browser on any OS.

What Google is doing is not recreating a new kind of OS, they’re creating the best way to not need one at all.

So why release this new OS instead of using Android? After all, it has already been successfully ported to netbooks. Google admits that there is some overlap there. But a key difference they don’t mention is the ability to run on the x86 architecture. Android cannot do that (though there are ports), Chrome OS can and will. But more, Google wants to emphasize that Chrome OS is all about the web, whereas Android is about a lot of different things. Including apps that are not standard browser-based web apps.

But Chrome OS will be all about the web apps. And no doubt HTML 5 is going to be a huge part of all of this. A lot of people are still wary about running web apps for when their computer isn’t connected to the web. But HTML 5 has the potential to change that, as you’ll be able to work in the browser even when not connected, and upload when you are again.

We’re starting to see more clearly why Google’s Vic Gundotra was pushing HTML 5 so hard at Google I/O this year. Sure, part of it was about things like Google Wave, but Google Wave is just one of many new-style apps in this new Chrome OS universe.

But there is a wild card in all of this still for Microsoft: Windows 7. While Windows XP is 8 years old, and Windows Vista is just generally considered to be a bad OS for netbooks, Windows 7 could offer a good netbook experience. And Microsoft had better hope so, or its claim that 96% of netbooks run Windows is going to be very different in a year.

Google plans to release the open source code for Chrome OS later this year ahead of the launch next year. Don’t be surprised if this code drops around the same time as Windows 7. Can’t wait to hear what Microsoft will have to say about all of this. Good thing they have a huge conference next week.
 
I already run OSX... Microsoft blows, and I'm glad to see another possible choice out there. Competition is good.
 

Namreg

Banned
this is pretty old news... been known and even announced for a few months now.

in the short term, this means shit- games are on windows, and so is office. in the long term, this could have an effect on MS, but only if google develops drivers for all sorts of hardware configs (and makes their system run stable on them), and if they get support from gamers/businesses.

google is perhaps the only one of MS' competitors who has enough money to tough it out for a few years while things are slowly progressing, so i give them a good chance at success. but i won't be switching next week... maybe in 5 years.
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
Microsoft will prevail.
 
I already have 2 browsers on my computer & I don't need a 3rd...
 

mr google

Banned
Competition is good for the consumer. :thumbsup:
 
Wow I never looked at it from that perspective, its uncanny the similarity of colour schemes. I guess that wouldnt have gone unoticed in Redmond or Google HQ!;)

Competition is good for the consumer. :thumbsup:
Thought you might say that, and indeed competition is good.
I already have 2 browsers on my computer & I don't need a 3rd...
This is not just a browser but a completely new lightweight operating system.
I am excited for this.
Yes me too. we may actually have some real choice again in the market place.
 

mr google

Banned
Thought You Might say that, and indeed competition is good.

Yes, indeed. If you give one businessman the opportunity to totally dominate a market they will charge the earth for something that's only worth $1. Competition is vital.

All this talk of competition reminds me... You sound like a wise man.
Why don't you pop into the big fight thread and join team google? ;)
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
I'm not sure if I want a Google Operating System after what they are accused of doing.

Competition is a good thing. There should be many different computer
systems to choose from. From many different companies.

AMD should have their own system.
 
Google can go screw themselves. I won't be trusting G with my data. I will continue to use Google as a search engine as nothing else competes. (cont.).
 
alternate things are ok to come, but Microsoft OS and its product couldn't be ruined as early.
 

mr google

Banned
Google can go screw themselves. I won't be trusting G with my data. I will continue to use Google as a search engine as nothing else competes. (cont.).

How dare you pick on my dad. :1orglaugh ;)
 
Ummm, entirely different models ...

Microsoft will prevail.
Google lives on content and sales of advertising built around that content.
Microsoft lives on software sales, and subsidizing partners to sell their software.

Bill Gates correctly identified, back in the mid '90s, that the new "web" service on the Internet was a total threat to their entire profit model.
They managed to kill the browser leader, but they still have to deal with the content providers.
Gates overlooked the search engine, as did Yahoo and others, and the rest is history.

As long as Google can keep its share in the content, it can subsidize solutions outside of Microsoft's control.
Understand Microsoft has everything to lose -- you don't go "up" when you already control 90% of distribution channels.
Right now non-Windows based netbooks sell as much as Windows-based netbooks.
 
Top