• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

full figured women (not fat)

lezbn

Banned
Scratching my head ...

She's not a porn star, but Jana Defi ,or Princessa, is my top pick for full figured women. All natural, no surgery of any kind.
http://www.pinupfiles.com/promo/videos/jana_redroom_1.html
When did 38-25-38" at 5'8" become "full figured"? That's Jana Defi she's just tall!

Same goes for Carol Goldernova, who is 38-26-38" at 5'9" the last time I checked.

I thought the "ultimate ideal" was 36-24-36" at 5'6"-5'7" for hourglass thin, with the most sickly-boney women only capable of 34-22-34" at similar heights (let alone most with those dimensions are sub-5'6", it's very difficult to be that tall and thin).

Again, typically an "ideal model" that is about as slender as she can be without her ribcage and pelvis completely protruding to the point most men don't like it ...

- 34-22-34" ~ 5'4" - 5'5"
- 36-24-36" ~ 5'6" - 5'7"
- 38-26-38" ~ 5'8" - 5'9"

Marilyn Monroe was 38-26-38" at only 5'5", so she must even be more "full figured" than Jana (fat?).

Again, I'm scratching my head.

BTW, I started a thread awhile back here:
Full figured women (FFW), but slender, voluptuous NOT chubby
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=112412

To me a "full figured woman" is a woman that could stand to lose 20lbs. to be her "most ideal" but is not necessarily "unfit" or has dimensions that are more than just 2" beyond typical while being as slender as possible is a FFW.

Probably my ideal example of "full figured" in the supermodel world is Kate Dillon. Around 5'9" and a size 14 at 165lbs., she could -- at best -- manage a 20lbs. drop to under 150lbs. and a size 10 before it became a health issue. At age 16 she was name "the next Cindy Crawford" at a size 6 but no matter how anorexic her eating habits were, she couldn't maintain the size and she got smart before she died stupid.

Otherwise, Shay Laren is definitely "full figured" with 36-28-36" (can't say I agree with the mid-section dimension) at just over 5'6". There has to be a line drawn between what is "extremely fit" and what is "full figured," otherwise it's a very fine line between ... say ... a "full figured" Jana and a woman who dies of starvation.
 
Should this thread be renamed?

I was looking through various posts in this thread and I guess I didn't realize the "samples" that had come about. I'm seeing a lot of 36-24-36" on women of typical height. I only noted Amee Donovan who is 36-24-34" at 5'0" which makes her more of a stocky model (hourglass with a slight apple to her), and probably qualifies as "full figured" (in a short variety).

Full figured women are typically considered size 14+, at least at typical heights, with big beautiful women (BBW) being 20+. Maybe this thread should be renamed? Maybe call it "thin, built" women? Or "thin, curvy" women? Just curious. I never considered a woman who is of ideal model curvature to be "full figured" and the fashion and model industry is the same way.

It would be one thing if we were talking size 10+. But most of these woman being listed are under size 10, they just aren't size 2 or 4, and more 6 and 8. Size 6 or even 8 at 5'6" let alone 5'8" is not what one would remotely call "full figured."

Women who can attain a size 2-4 at 5'6" are figures like that of Sandee Westgate, 34-23-34" at 5'6", and beyond extremely rare. Again, full figured is considered at least size 14+ and these women aren't close.

I mean, even Danni Ashe is 35-23-35" at 5'2", size 6 (more like size 2-4 but the bust, which is more along a 38" equivalent, pushes her to size 6), and very questionable as "full figured." She's a voluptuous dream, hell yes! But full figured? Really hard to say that, given she's about as tight of a figure as you can get in her frame.

Just saying, the phrase is going to draw a different interest.
 

jasonk282

Banned
To me I perfer my women size 12-16 and 5'3"-5'5" thats what I consider sexy
 
Top