So, you think the Ku Klux Klan and the Spanish Inquisition are bad? So do we, but... put the Numbers in Perspective

More people are ****ed by Islamists each year than in all 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition combined.

(source) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

Islamic terrorists ****** more people every day than the Ku Klux Klan has in the last 50 years.

(source) http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_were_killed_by_the_Ku_Klux_Klan

More civilians were ****ed by Muslim extremists in two hours on September 11th than in the 36 years of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland.

(source) http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/********/death95w.htm

19 Muslim hijackers ****ed more innocents in two hours on September 11th than the number of American criminals executed in the last 65 years.

(source) http://deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions-united-states-1608-1976-state
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
So, you think the Ku Klux Klan and the Spanish Inquisition are bad? So do we, but... put the Numbers in Perspective

What about the Black Panthers? Seems America needs a new Klan movement to protect whites.
Black on white crime is far too high.


So you're against abortion huh?

Any sensible person is against ******icide.




100 million dead and counting.


5.56 mm - tried and true communist ****er.

Communism/ Zionism are the same thing. Zionist created Communism.
 

vodkazvictim

Why save the world, when you can rule it?
Amount of people prepared to give sam any credibility whatsoever:
zero
zip
none
nilch
nada
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Hey Education-boy, do us a favor and look up the definition of ******icide. :facepalm:


****ing babies no different from abortion, experts say
Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies ****ed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.


The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby ****ed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.


The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article's authors had received death threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.

The article, entitled “After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?”, was written by two of Prof Savulescu’s former associates, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.

They argued: “The moral status of an ****** is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.”

Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’.

Article

****ing babies is the same whether the ***** is in the womb or outside. It's wrong and you need to see that.
 
Wow, we get it, you **** anybody who isn't the same color as you, and you're willing to project anything a member of another race/religion has done onto everyone from that race/religion to make your point (which is that you are an idiot).
 
Top